You are here

Home » Content

SOMUT VE SOMUT OLMAYAN KÜLTÜR VARLIKLARININ ETKİLEŞİMLERİNE DAYANAN BÜTÜNCÜL BIR KORUMA YAKLAŞIMI

AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO CONSERVATION BASED ON THE INTERRELATIONS OF TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE CULTURAL PROPERTIES

Journal Name:

  • Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011
DOI: 
10.4305

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Studies for the conservation of historic environments have evolved from the conservation of only physical properties to an inclusive conservation approach concerning cultural properties. The significance of the cultural aspects of historic environments has been realized and discussed especially since 1950-1960s. Despite of an increasing awareness of the subject, the studies on the identification and the documentation of intangible cultural properties are still less advanced than those on tangible cultural properties. Today, conservation practices within historic environments mainly focus on the discussions on preserving and continuing “cultural identity”. In this respect, beside tangible cultural properties, intangible values embodied within the components of built environments, their identification, analysis and conservation also gain importance. This paper presents a holistic approach for analyzing historic built environments as an entity of tangible and intangible cultural properties. It mainly puts forward the assumption that intangible and tangible cultural properties need to be conserved together in historic environments. In this sense, it presents a conceptual model for analyzing the interrelations between tangible and intangible cultural properties, in other words, built environment and culture. Then, it applies this model on the İbrahimpaşa Village. As a conclusion, it puts forward possible conservation approaches for the sustainability of the integrity of interrelations between tangible and intangible cultural properties in the village.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Fiziki özelliklerin korunmasıyla başlamış olan tarihi çevre koruma çalışmaları, kültürel özelliklerin korunması da içeren kapsamlı koruma yaklaşımlarıyla sürmektedir. Tarihi çevrelerin, kültürel yönlerinin önemi, özellikle 1950- 60 yıllarından itibaren tartışılmaya başlanmıştır. Artan farkındalığa rağmen, somut olmayan kültürel varlıkları saptama ve belgeleme çalışmaları, fiziki varlıkların belgelenmesinin oldukça gerisindedir. Günümüzde, tarihi çevre koruma pratikleri, esas olarak, kültürel kimliği koruma ve sürdürmeye odaklanmaktadır. Bu bakımdan, somut özelliklerin yanısıra, yapılı çevrelerde somutlaşan, somut olmayan değerlerin saptanması, incelenmesi ve korunması önem kazanmaktadır. Bu yazı, tarihi çevreleri, somut ve somut olmayan kültür varlıkları arasındaki ilişkiler bütünü olarak incelemek için bütüncül bir yaklaşım sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, esas olarak, tarihi çevrelerde, somut ve somut olmayan kültür varlıklarının birlikte korunması gerekliliği savını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu açıdan, tarihi çevrelerde somut ve somut olmayan kültür varlıklarının, başka bir deyişle, kültür ve yapılı çevrelerin etkileşimlerinin incelenmesine yönelik bir kavramsal model sunmakta ve bu modelin, İbrahimpaşa Köyü’nde uygulamasını yapmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma, köydeki somut ve somut olmayan kültür varlıklarının etkileşimleri ile oluşan bütünlüğün sürdürülebilirliğine yönelik koruma yaklaşımları önermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_290_28_pp_105-125.pdf
  • 2
105-125
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

ALIVIZATOU, M. (2006) Museums and Intangible Heritage: The Dynamics
of an “Unconventional” Relationship, Papers from Institute of
Archaeology, n: 17; 47-57.
BALAMİR, A., URAZ, T.U. (2006) Themes of Places and Spaces in Design
Teaching: a Joint Studio Experiment in Amasya. METU JFA, v: 23,
n:1; 1-18.
BİLSEL, C. (1989) New Building in a Historical Urban Setting as an Urban
Design Problem: The case of Yeni Foça, Unpublished Master Thesis,
METU, Faculty of Architecture, Ankara.
BOURDIEU, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice, translated by Richard Nice,
Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
BOURDIEU, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, New York.
DORATLI, N. (2005) Revitalizing historic urban quarters: A model for
determining the most relevant strategic approach, European Planning
Studies (13:5) 749-72.
ECO, U. (1973) Function and Sign: Semiotics of Architecture, in J. Bryan
and R.Sauer, eds., Structures Implicit and Explicit, University of
Pennsylvania, New York.
ERDEMİR, E. (1997) The Role of Taste in Referring the House as Home, in
proceedings of the international symposium: Culture and Space in the
Home Environment, Critical Evaluations and New Paradigms, İstanbul,
İTÜ, Faculty of Architecture in collaboration with IAPS.
ERDER, C., ed. (1971) Selected Readings in Architectural Conservation, METU
Faculty of Architecture, Department of Restoration of Historic
Monuments, Ankara.
ERK, M.F. (1984) Akköy: A Study on Vernacular Architecture with Reference to
A Specific Case, Unpublished Master Thesis in Architecture, METU,
Ankara.
FEILDEN, B.M., JOKILEHTO, J. (1998) Management Guidelines for World
Cultural Heritage Sites, ICCROM, Rome.
HERSKOVITS, M. J. (1955) Cultural Anthropology, New York.
HUBKA, T. (1979) Just Folks Designing: Vernacular Designers and the
Generation of Form, JAE, v: 32, n: 3; 27-9.
KARAKUL, Ö. (2011) A Holistic Approach to Historic Environments
Integrating Tangible and Intangible Values Case Study: İbrahimpaşa
Village in Ürgüp, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis in Architecture, METU,
Ankara.
KARAKUL, Ö. (2009) A Conservation Approach to Interrupted
Interrelations Between Tangible and Intangible Cultural Heritage:
Revitalization, Paper presented at Revitalising Built Environments:
Requalifying Old Places for New Uses, International Symposium
jointly organized by IAPS- CSBE and IAPS-Housing Network, in
Proceedings ISBN-978-975-561-359-8; October 12-16, İstanbul.
KARAKUL, Ö. (2008) A Holistic Approach: Unity of Tangible and Intangible
Values in the Conservation of Historic Built Environments, in
Conference Book of 11th World Conference of Historical Cities, June
10-13, Metropolitan Municipality of Konya, Konya; 43-57.
KARAKUL, Ö. (2007) Folk Architecture in Historic Environments: Living
Spaces for Intangible Cultural Heritage, International and Quarterly
Journal of Cultural Studies (10:19:75);151-63.
KNOX, P. (1984) Symbolism, Styles and Settings: The Built Environment
and the Imperatives of Urbanized Capitalism, Architecture and
Behaviour (2: 2)107-22.
KOTNIK, T. (2005) Architecture and Gender relationship in Yemen, Space
and Culture, n: 8; 4.
LAWRENCE, D., LOW, S. M. (1990) The Built Environment and Spatial
Form, Annual Review of Anthropology (19) 453-505.
LAWRENCE, R.J. (1987) Housing, Dwellings and Homes/ Design Theory,
Research and Practice, Great Britain: John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Great
Britain.
MALINOWSKI, B. (1944) A Scientific Theory of Culture, The University of
North Carolina Press Chapel Hill, New York.
OLIVER, P. (1997). Cultural Traits and Environmental Contexts- Problems
of Cultural Specifity and Cross- Cultural Comparability. In
Proceedings of the International Symposium Culture and Space in
the Home Environment, Critical Evaluations and New Paradigms.
İstanbul: ITU, Faculty of Architecture in Collaboration with “IAPS”.
ÖZMEN, A., BAŞKAYA, A. (1997) Influence of Changing Social Structure
on Space Organization: Block Housing in Ankara, 1920-1950, in
proceedings of an international symposium: Culture and Space in
the Home Environment, Critical Evaluations and New Paradigms, İTÜ
Faculty of Architecture in Collaboration with IAPS, İstanbul.
PETRUCCIOLI, A. (1998) AliceDilemma, in A. Petruccioli, ed., Typological
Process and Design Theory, Cambridge; 57-72.
PINNA, G. (2003) Intangible Heritage and Museums, ICOM News, 4,
http://icom.museum/pdf/E_news2003/p4_2003-4.pdf, Retrieved
February 10, 2008.
PULTAR, M. (1997) A Structured Approach to Cultural Studies of
Architectural Space, in proceedings of an international symposium:
Culture and Space in the Home Environment, Critical Evaluations and
New Paradigms, İTÜ Faculty of Architecture in Collaboration with
IAPS, İstanbul.
RAPOPORT, A. (2004) Kültür Mimarlık Tasarım, Yapı Endüstri Merkezi,
İstanbul.
RAPOPORT, A. (2002) Traditional Environments, Culture and
Preservation, in H. Turgut and P. Kellett, eds., Traditional
Environments in a New Millenium: Defining Principles and Professional
Practice, İTÜ Faculty of Architecture, İstanbul; 26-32.
RAPOPORT, A. (2001) Theory, Culture and Housing, Housing, Theory and
Society (17) 145-65.
RAPOPORT, A. (1990) Systems of Activities and Systems of Settings,
in S. Kent, ed., Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space: An
Interdisciplinary Cross-Cultural Study, Cambridge University Press,
UK.
RAPOPORT, A. (1982) The Meaning of Built Environment: A Non-verbal
Communication Approach USA.
RAPOPORT, A. (1969) House Form and Culture, New York.
Rational architecture : the reconstruction of the European city = Architecture
rationnelle : la reconstruction de la ville européenne. (1978). Bruxelles :
Editions des Archives d’architecture Moderne.
RIEGL, A. (1998) The Modern Cult of Monuments, in K.M. Hays, ed.,
Oppositions Reader: Selected readings from a journal for ideas and criticism
in architecture, 1973-1984, New York.
ROSSI, A. (1982) The Architecture of The City. Cambridge, Massachusetts:
MIT Press.
SARGIN, G. (1989) A Research For Recovery of the Identity of Place, with
special reference to Historical Urban Environments, Unpublished
Master Thesis in Architecture, METU, Ankara.
STEA, D., TURAN, M. (1993) Placemaking Production of Built Environment in
Two Cultures, Great Britain.
STEFANO, M. L. (2009) Safeguarding Intangible Heritage: Five Key
Obstacles Facing Museums of the North East of England,
International Journal of Intangible Heritage (4) 111-26.
TIESDELL, S., OC, T., HEATH, T. (1996) Revitalizing Historic Urban
Quarters, Architectural Press, Oxford, Boston.
UNESCO (2007) Sub-Regional Meeting on the Convention for the Safeguarding
of the Intangible Cultural Heritage: Implementation and Inventory-
Making, 27-28 November, Dar es Salaam, Republic Tanzania.
UNESCO (2005) Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the
Diversity of Cultural Expressions, October 20. Paris, http://unesdoc.
unesco.org/images/0014/001429/142919e.pdf, retrieved December
23, 2004.
UNESCO (2003) Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible
Cultural Heritage, 32nd Session of the General Conference,September 29-October 17, Paris, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/
images/0013/001325/132540e.pdf, Retrieved December 23, 2004.
UNESCO (1972) Convention Concerning the Protection of the World
Cultural and Natural Heritage, 17th Session of the General
Conference, November 16, Paris, http://whc.unesco.org/archive/
convention-en.pdf, retrieved April 14 , 2008.
WULF, C. (2004) Crucial Points in the Transmission and Learning of Intangible
Heritage, Proceedings of the International Conference Globalization
and Intangible Cultural Heritage, UNESCO and United Nations
University, Tokyo, Japan; 85-95.
TAN, N. (1997) Folklor (Halkbilimi) Genel Bilgiler, ABO Basım, İstanbul.
TUAN, Y. (1974) Topophilia A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes,
and Values, New Jersey. USA.
TÜRKMEN, K. T. (1999) Bilinmeyen Kapadokya’dan Bir Kesit, Ürün Yayınları,
Ankara.
http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/index.php?pg=00061, UNESCO,
Living Human Treasures System.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com