You are here

Home » Content

Beyin Paradoksları Bağlamlı Olarak Örtülü Bilgi Geliştirme Yöntemleri ve Organizasyon Yapıları Arasında İlişki Zinciri Analizi

The Analysis of Relationship Zinc in the Context of Brain Paradoxes Between Methods of Developing Tacit Knowledge and Organizational Structures

Journal Name:

  • Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper reports on a conceptual analysis of tacit knowledge and examines the relation between tacit knowledge and functional characteristics of human brain hemispheres. The objective of this paper, considering the reality of right and left brain paradoxes as one of the most outstanding sources of tacit knowledge, is to demonstrate the relation between tacit knowledge developing ways and favorable organization structures
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale örtülü bilginin kavramsal bir analiziyle birlikte örtülü bilgi ile sağ ve sol beyin paradoksları arasındaki ilişkiyi irdelemektedir. Makalenin amacı sağ ve sol beyin paradoksları gerçeğinden hareketle örtülü bilgi geliştirme yolları ve uygun organizasyon yapıları arasındaki ilişkiye dikkat çekmektir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-beyin-paradokslari-baglamli-olarak-ortulu-bilgi-gelistirme-yontemleri-organizasyon-yapilari-arasinda-iliski-zinciri-analizi.pdf
  • 7
105
119
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Aldemir, C.; A. Ataol,
v
e G. Budak (1998). Personel Yönetimi. İzmir: Barış Yayınları Alder, H. (2000). Sağ Beyin Yöneticisi. İstanbul: Kariyer Yayıncılık.
Bloodgood, J. M. and D.
Salisbur
y (2001). "Understanding The Influence of Organizational Change Strategies On Information Technology and Knowledge Management Strategies". Decision Support Systems, Vol. 31: 55-69.
Boiral Olivier (2002). "Tacit Knowledge and Environmental Management". Long Range Plan¬ning, Vol. 35: 291-317.
118 Hulusi Do ğ an
Dawson, Patrick (1997). "In At the Deep End: Conducting Processual Research on Organizational Change". Scandinavian Journal Management, Vol. 13, No. 4: 389-405. Erkan, H. (1994). Bilgi Toplumu ve Ekonomik Gelişme. İstanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları. Grant, R. M. (1991). "The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications
for Strategy Formulation". California Management Review, Spring: 114-135. Hall, R. and P. Andriani (2003). "Managing Knowledge Associated with Innovation". Journal
of Business Research], Vol. 56: 145-152. Johannessen, J. A.; B. Olsen and J. Olaisen (1999). "Aspects of Innovation Theory Based on Knowledge Management". International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 19:
121-139.
Johannessen, J. A.; B. Olsen and J. Olaisen (2001). "Mismanagement of Tacit Knowledge: The Importance of Tacit Knowledge: The Danger of Information Technology and What to Do About It". International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 21: 3-20. Kesken, J. (2002). "Yönetim Bilimi İnsan Gücü Sermayesini Tanıdı, Ya İnsan Gücünün En Önemli Sermayesini". 10. Ulusal Yönetim Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 23-25
Mayıs 2002: 31-39.
Ketchand, A. A. and J. P. Strawser (1998). "The Existence of Multiple Measures of Organ¬izational Commitment and Experience: Related Differences in A Public Accounting Set¬ting". BehıavioralResearch) in Accounting, Vol. 10: 109-138. Koçel, T. (1999). İşletme Yöneticiliği. İstanbul: Beta.
Koskinen, K. U. (2000). "Tacit Knowledge as a Promoter of Project Success". European
Journal
of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 6: 41-47. Koskinen, K. U. and H. Vanharanta (2002). "The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Innovation Proc¬ess of Small Technology Companies". Int. J. Production Economics, Vol. 80: 57-64. Mascitelli, R. (2000). "From Experience: Harnessing Tacit Knowledge to Achieve Break¬through Innovation". J. Prod. Innovation Management, Vol. 17: 179-193. Morgan, G. (1998). Yönetim ve Örgüt Teorilerinde Metafor. İstanbul: MESS Yayınları. Morrison, K. A. (1997). "How Franchise Job Satisfaction and Personality Affects Perform¬ance, Organizational Commitment, Franchisor Relations, And Intention to Remain". Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 35, No. 3: 39-68.
Nightingale, P (1998). "A Cognitive Model of Innovation". Research Policy, Vol. 27: 689-709.
Nonaka, I.; R. Toyama and N. Konno (2000). "SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of
Dynamic Knowledge Creation". Long Range Planning, Vol. 33: 5-34. Özden, M. (2003). Anatomi ve Fizyoloji. Ankara: Feryal Matbaası.
Özkalp, E. ve Ç. Kırel (1996). Örgütsel Davranış. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları. Philip, T. (1996). Getting Competitive, New York: McGraw Hill.
Ropo, A. and J. Parvainen
(2001)
. "Leadership and Bodily Knowledge in Expert Organizations: Epistemological Rethinking". Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 17: 1-18. Salter, A. and D. Gann (2003). "Sources of Ideas for Innovation in Engineering Design".
Beyin
Paradokslar
ı Bağlamlı Olarak Örtülü Bilgi Geliştirme Yöntemleri. 119
Researchı
Policy, Vol. 1591: 1-16.
Schappe, S. P. (1998). "The Influence Of Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, And Fairness Perceptions On Organizational Citizenship Behavior". Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary & Applied, Vol. 132, No. 3: 277-291.
Schulz, M. and J. A. Lloyd (2001). "Codification and Tacit ness as Knowledge Management Studies: An Empirical Exploration". Journal of High Technology Management Research,
Vol. 12: 139-165.
Stewart, T. (1997). Entelektüel Sermaye. İstanbul: Kontent Kitap.
Ulrich, Dave (1998). "Intellectual Capital = Competence X Commitment". Sloan Management Review, Winter: 15-26.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com