Anderson, E., & Kim, D. (2006). Increasing the Success of Minority Students in Science and Technology.
Washington, DC: American Council on Educaton.
Barr, D.A., González, M.E., & Wanat, S.F. (2008). The Leaky Pipeline: Factors Associated With Early Decline in
Interest in Premedical Studies Among Underrepresented Minority Undergraduate Students. Academic
Medicine, 83(5), 503-511. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31816bda16
Betnger, E. (2010). To Be or Not to Be: Major Choices in Budding Scientsts. In C.T. Clotelter (Ed.), American
Universites in a Global Market (pp. 68-98). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
htp://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226110455.003.0003
Borooah, V.K. (2001). Logit and Probit: Ordered and Multnomial Models. Sage University Papers Series on
Quanttatve Applicatons in the Social Sciences (07-138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Burtner, J. (2005). The Use of Discriminant Analysis to Investgate the Infuence of Non-Cognitve Factors on
Engineering School Persistence. Journal of Engineering Educaton, 94(3), 335-338. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-
9830.2005.tb00858.x
Carnevale, A.P., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2011). STEM: Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematcs.
Washington, DC: Center on Educaton and the Workforce, Georgetown University.
Carrell, S.E., Page, M.E., & West, J.E. (2010). Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender
Gap. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1101-1144. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1101
Chang, M.J., Cerna, O., Han, J., & Sáenz, V. (2008). The Contradictory Roles of Insttutonal Status in Retaining
Underrepresented Minorites in Biomedical and Behavioral Science Majors. The Review of Higher Educaton,
31(4), 433-464. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0011
Chang, M.J., Eagan, M.K., Lin, M.H., & Hurtado, S. (2011). Considering the Impact of Racial Stgmas and Science
Identty: Persistence Among Biomedical and Behavioral Science Aspirants. Journal of Higher Educaton, 82(5),
564-596. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2011.0030
Chen, X. (2009). Students Who Study Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematcs (STEM) in
Postsecondary Educaton (NCES 2009-161). Natonal Center for Educaton Statstcs, Insttute of Educaton
Sciences, U.S. Department of Educaton. Washington, DC.
Daempfe, P. (2003). An Analysis of the High Atriton Rates Among First Year College Science, Math, and
Engineering Majors. Journal of College Student Retenton: Research, Theory and Practce, 5(1), 37-52.
htp://dx.doi.org/10.2190/DWQT-TYA4-T20W-RCWH
Eagan, K., Herrera, F.A., Garibay, J.C., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. (2011). Becoming STEM Protégés: Factors
Predictng the Access and Development of Meaningful Faculty-Student Relatonships. Los Angeles: Higher
Educaton Research Insttute.
Ehrenberg, R.G. (2010). Analyzing the Factors That Infuence Persistence Rates in STEM Field Majors:
Introducton to the Symposium. Economics of Educaton Review, 29(6), 888-891.
htp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.012
Espinosa, L.L. (2011). Pipelines and Pathways: Women of Color in Undergraduate STEM Majors and the College
Experiences That Contribute to Persistence. Harvard Educaton Review, 81(2), 209-240.
Fouad, N.A., Hacket, G., Smith, P.L., Kantamneni, N., Fitzpatrick, M., Haag, S. et al. (2010). Barriers and Supports
for Contnuing in Mathematcs and Science: Gender and Educatonal Level Diferences. Journal of Vocatonal
Behavior, 77(3), 361-373. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.06.004
Gayles, J.G., & Ampaw, F. (2014). The Impact of College Experiences on Degree Completon in STEM Fields at
Four-Year Insttutons: Does Gender Mater?. The Journal of Higher Educaton, 85(4), 439-468.
htp://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2014.0022Grifth, A. (2010). Persistence of Women and Minorites in STEM Field Majors: Is It the School That Maters?.
Economics of Educaton Review, 29(6), 911-922. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.010
Haag, S., & Collofello, J. (2008, October 22−25). Engineering Undergraduate Persistence and Contributng
Factors. Paper presented at the 38th ASEE/IEEE Annual Fronters in Educaton Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY.
Hill, C., Corbet, C., & Rose, A.S. (2010). Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematcs. Washington, DC: American Associaton of University Women.
Kelly, D., Xie, H., Nord, C.W., Jenkins, F., Chan, J.Y., & Kastberg, D. (2013). Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old
Studentsin Mathematcs, Science, and Reading Literacy in an Internatonal Context: First Look at PISA 2012
(NCES 2014-024). Natonal Center for Educaton Statstcs, Insttute of Educaton Sciences, U.S. Department of
Educaton. Washington, DC.
Kokkelenberg, E.C., & Sinha, E. (2010). Who Succeeds in STEM Studies? An Analysis of Binghamton University.
Economics of Educaton Review, 29(6), 935-946. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.016
LeBeau, B., Harwell, M., Monson, D., Dupuis, D., Medhanie, A., & Post, T.R. (2012). Student and High-School
Characteristcs Related to Completng a Science, Technology, Engineering or Mathematcs (STEM) Major in
College. Research in Science & Technological Educaton, 20(1), 17-28. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.659178
Lowell, B.L., Salzman, H., Bernstein, H., & Henderson, E. (2009, November 7). Steady as She Goes? Three
Generatons of Students Through the Science and Engineering Pipeline. Paper presented at the Annual Meetngs
of the Associaton for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC.
Méndez, G., Buskirk, T.D., Lohr, S., & Haag, S. (2008). Factors Associated With Persistence in Science and
Engineering Majors: An Exploratory Study Using Classifcaton Trees and Random Forests. Journal of Engineering
Educaton, 97(1), 57-70. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00954.x
Mervis, J. (2010). Beter Intro Courses Seen as Key to Reducing Atriton of STEM Majors. Science, 330(6002),
306. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.330.6002.306
Natonal Academy of Science, Commitee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP). (2005). Rising
Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC:
Natonal Academies Press.
Natonal Governors Associaton. (2007). Building a Science, Technology, Engineering and Math Agenda.
Washington, DC: Author.
Natonal Research Council. (2012). Monitoring Progress Toward Successful K−12 STEM Educaton: A Naton
Advancing?. Washington, DC: Natonal Academies Press.
Natonal Science Board. (2010). Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: Natonal Science
Foundaton.
Natonal Science Board. (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: Natonal Science
Foundaton.
Natonal Science Board. (2014). Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: Natonal Science
Foundaton.
Ost, B. (2010). The Role of Peers and Grades in Determining Major Persistence in Sciences. Economics of
Educaton Review, 29(6), 923-934. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.011
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2012). Engage to Excel: Producing One
Million Additonal College Graduates With Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematcs.
Washington, DC: Author.
Price, J. (2010). The Efect of Instructor Race and Gender on Student Persistence in STEM Fields. Economics of
Educaton Review, 29(6), 901-910. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.07.009
Rask, K. (2010). Atriton in STEM Fields at a Liberal Arts College: The Importance of Grades and Pre-Collegiate
Preferences. Economics of Educaton Review, 29(6), 892-900. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.013
Seymour, E. (2001). Tracking the Processes of Change in U.S. Undergraduate Educaton in Science, Mathematcs,
Engineering, and Technology. Science Educaton, 86(1), 79-105. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.1044
Seymour, E., & Hewit, N.M. (1997). Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder,
CO: Westview Press.
Shaw, E.J., & Barbut, S. (2010). Paterns of Persistence in Intended College Major With a Focus on STEM Majors.
The Natonal Academic Advising Associaton Journal, 30(2), 19-34.Snyder, T.D., & Dillow, S.A. (2013). Digest of Educaton Statstcs, 2012 (NCES 2014-015). Natonal Center for
Educaton Statstcs, Insttute of Educaton Sciences, U.S. Department of Educaton. Washington, DC.
Stnebrickner, T.R., & Stnebrickner, R. (2011). Math or Science? Using Longitudinal Expectatons Data to
Examine the Process of Choosing a College Major. NBER Working Paper No. 16869. Cambridge, MA: Natonal
Bureau of Economic Research. htp://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w16869
Wang, M.T., Eccles, J.S., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not Lack of Ability but More Choice: Individual and Gender
Diferences in Choice of Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematcs. Psychological Science,
24(5), 770-775. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797612458937
Whalen, D.F., & Shelley, M.C. (2010). Academic Success for STEM and Non-STEM Majors. Journal of STEM
Educaton, 11(1,2), 45-60.
Zumeta, W., & Raveling, J. (2002). The Best and Brightest: Is There a Problem Here?. Washington, DC:
Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
