You are here

FEEDBACK AND FEEDFORWARD: FOCAL POINTS FOR IMPROVING ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.49
Abstract (2. Language): 
The effective integration of competencies in university programmes follows a holistic and diversified assessment model and the educational potential development of students’ assessment results. This work questions: how are students informed about the results of their learning? Specifically, it aims to understand students’ and professors’ perspectives about the use of learning results and the strategies that are promoted in the practice of improved use of their educational potential. The results described are derived from a case study on 12 degrees adapted to the EHEA. Although feedback and the feedforward are strategies for informing students about their learning results, the results of the study show that their use is not entirely generalised and frequently only inform the grades obtained. Students identify the difference between knowing the grade and obtaining feedback. The tutorial dimension is also valued positively when students are informed about the results of their assessment. However, it seems that use of the educational potential is pending. The students say that the tutorials and the follow up through continual assessment helps to reduce failure. Also, the faculty identifies that reflection about the results obtained is very much linked to metacognitive reflection, although it is not generalised in practice. The students recognise the limitations and the work load involved for the professor to individually monitor them. The study is concluded with the need for systematically incorporating feedback and feedforward in teaching practices and offers guidelines for orienting these strategies towards improving academic performance.
77-85

REFERENCES

References: 

Basso, D., & Olivetti Belardinelli, M. (2006). The role of the feedforward paradigm in cognitive psychology.
Cognitive Processing, 7(2), 73-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-006-0034-1
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4),
532-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258557
Fullerton, H. (1995). Embedding alternatives approaches in assessment, in E. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for
learning in Higher Education, London: Kogan Page.
García-Sanpedro, M.J. (2010). Diseño y validación de un modelo de evaluación por competencias en la
universidad. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Available online in:
http://www.tesisenred.net/handle/10803/5065
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2009). Condiciones para una evaluación continuada favorecedora del aprendizaje.
Colección: Cuadernos de docencia universitaria, Nº13. Barcelona: ICE-UB y Ediciones Octaedro.
Habermas, J. (1982). Conocimiento e interés. Madrid: Taurus.
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203413937

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com