You are here

SOME EXPERIENCES RELATED TO INNOVATION METHODOLOGIES WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY CLASSROOM

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.43
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this second year of our Journal JOTSE our main challenge is to publish experiences related to innovation methodologies within the university classroom. Thus, allowing for the implementation and/or evaluation of competences throughout students’ learning process and, especially, in the scientific and technological fields. We understand competences as the combination of knowledge, skills and attitudes necessary to perform a task efficiently. Thereby, demonstrating abilities in action and developing them through activities that integrate all these aspects. In the area of higher studies in the scientific and/or technological fields it is rather common that the methodologies developed have a very practical component and, in addition, they are closely linked to the professional career our students are being trained for. Particularly, in the last academic years and at the end of their studies it is when students attend more applied subjects, such as Projects in the case of Engineering Studies that together with the Degree’s Final Project (PFC) allow to integrate a wide range of generic or cross-curricular competences and specific ones within the field. These types of subjects have shown to be very efficient to make students become closer to the professional reality that they will face at the end of their studies and where they will have to provide a solution for problematic situations or to meet the needs nowadays society demands. (Dochy, Segers, Van den Bossche & Gijbels, 2003; Prince, 2004; Prince & Felder, 2006).
1-3

REFERENCES

References: 

Boud, D. & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education [online]. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved December 23, 2011, from
http://www.iml.uts.edu.au/assessment-futures/Assessment-2020_proposition....
Del Canto, P., Gallego, I., López, J. M., Medina, E., Mochón, F., Mora, J., et al. (2011). Follow-up and feedback processes in the EHEA. Journal of Technology and Science Education (JOTSE), 1(1), 12-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2011.14
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13, 533–568.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
Prince, M., & Felder, R.M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com