You are here

Research on the time optimization model algorithm of Customer Collaborative Product Innovation

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (Original Language): 
Purpose: To improve the efficiency of information sharing among the innovation agents of customer collaborative product innovation and shorten the product design cycle, an improved genetic annealing algorithm of the time optimization was presented. Design/methodology/approach: On the basis of the analysis of the objective relationship between the design tasks, the paper takes job shop problems for machining model and proposes the improved genetic algorithm to solve the problems, which is based on the niche technology and thus a better product collaborative innovation design time schedule is got to improve the efficiency. Finally, through the collaborative innovation design of a certain type of mobile phone, the proposed model and method were verified to be correct and effective. Findings: An algorithm with obvious advantages in terms of searching capability and optimization efficiency of customer collaborative product innovation was proposed. According to the defects of the traditional genetic annealing algorithm, the niche genetic annealing algorithm was presented. Firstly, it avoided the effective gene deletions at the early search stage and guaranteed the diversity of solution; Secondly, adaptive double point crossover and swap mutation strategy were introduced to overcome the defects of long solving process and easily converging local minimum value due to the fixed crossover and mutation probability; Thirdly, elite reserved strategy was imported that optimal solution missing was avoided effectively and evolution speed was accelerated; Finally, the new algorithm is tested by three typical functions and the job shop scheduling problems. Respectively, the simulation results show that the proposed algorithm can avoid the stagnation, which improves the global convergence ability and attains better optimization performance. Originality/value: Firstly, the improved genetic simulated annealing algorithm overcomes some defects such as effective gene easily lost in early search. It is helpful to shorten the calculation process and improve the accuracy of the convergence value. Moreover, it speeds up the evolution and ensures the reliability of the optimal solution. Meanwhile, it has obvious advantages in efficiency of information sharing among the innovation agents of customer collaborative product innovation. So, the product design cycle could be shortened.
137
152

REFERENCES

References: 

Andresen, M., Brasel, H., & Morig, M. (2008). Simulated annealing and genetic algorithms for
minimizing mean flow time in an open shop. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 48(7-8),
1279-1293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2008.01.002
-151-
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management – http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.838
Cai-Mao, S.U., & Ke, Y.L. (2006). Task planning and decoupling strategy for collaborative
design. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(1), 22-26.
Chunqiang, J., Ling, Y., & Jun, S. (2007). Optimal design of hydraulic manifold blocks based on
niching genetic simulated annealing algorithm. High Technology Letters (English Language
Edition), 13(4), 363-368.
Hou, L., Chen, F., & Wen, Z.J. (2007). Design task decomposition and allocation for inter-firm
product collaborative development. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science),
41(12), 1976-1981.
Hou, L., Han, D.H., & Lin, Z.S. (2006). Research on the Architecture of Product Collaborative
Development Chains. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 23(4), 133-135.
Joglekar, N.R., & Ford, D.N. (2005). Product development resource allocation with foresight.
European Journal of Operational Research, 160 (1), 72-87.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.021
Liang, X., Ge, P., & Yang, Y. (2011). Task Sequencing for Single Product Collaborative Designer
Based on Dependency Logic. China Mechanical Engineering, 22(2), 227-231.
Ming, X.G., & Yan, J.Q. (2008). Collaborative process planning and manufacturing in product
lifecycle management. Computers in Industry, 59, 154-166.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2007.06.012
Pang, H., Fang, Z.D., & Guo, H. (2008). Research on task scheduling method of cooperative
design. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 30(10), 1899-1903.
Sheng, B.Y., Lin, Z.J., & Ding, Y.F. (2006). Rough set-based conflict resolution case reasoning in
collaborative design. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(12), 1952-1956.
Song, L.J., Yang, Y., & Yang, J. (2008). Study on Task Scheduling in Collaborative Product
Development. China Mechanical Engineering, 19(7), 798-803.
Zhang, W.J., Liu, W., & Zhang, Z.J. (2009). Task assignment for suppliers’ participation in
collaborative product development. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 15(6),
1231-1236.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com