You are here

A new pricing model of China’s parallel rail lines under the diversified property rights

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.591
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to study on the pricing of China railway company under the background of diversified property rights, especially the pricing of the parallel line system that belong to different owners. Design/methodology/approach: Through theoretical analysis of the main influential factors of railway pricing, this paper designs a basic quotation system for the parallel railway lines. Findings: The transaction price of parallel line consists of two parts, which are fixed railway network price and variable network using price. Practical implications: Through the reasonable designing of fixed network price and variable network using price, it can not only lead to high profitability and low government subsidy, but also can ensure remaining more railway network resources and fulfill the social responsibilities. Originality/value: The conclusions of this study will lay the foundation for the harmonious development of Chinese railway network under the diversified property rights.
135-148

REFERENCES

References: 

Chaohe R. (2006). Boosting railway investment institutional reform in China from property relations. Comprehensive Transportation, 1, 32-36.
Christina N. (2008). User charges for the railway infrastructure in Bulgaria, Transportation Research Part A. Policy and Practice, 42(3), 487-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.015
Chunyan Q., Fang W., & Zhicheng L. (2010). Price discrimination method and its use in railway transport of passenger. Railway Operation Technology, 1, 16-20.
Coase R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(10), 1-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/466560
- 147 -
Journal
o
f I n d u s t r i a l Engineering and Management - h t t p : / / d x . d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 3 9 2 6 / j i e m . 5 91
Daian L. (2006). Research on the pricing problems of the railway infrastructure. Comprehensive Transportation, 7, 36-39.
Engui W., & Jiaqiong W. (2003). Legal impediments of non-governmental capital participating in rail way construction in China. Journal of Northern Jiaotong University (Social Sciences
Edition), 2(3), 15-19.
Francisco C., & Juan D. (2012). Are rail charges connected to costs. Journal of Transport Geography, 22(5), 28-33.
Hanbin Z., & Yan T. (2011). Railway rate regulation in America and its enlightenment on our country. Rail Way Transport and Economy, 11, 49-52.
Henrik A., & Mikael O. (2007). Noise charges in railway infrastructure: A pricing schedule based on the marginal cost principle. Transport Policy, 14(3), 204-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.01.002
Jing H. (2008). Railway infrastructure pricing in Europe. Chinese Railways, 12, 55-59.
Jian Z. (2007). Relationship among the united schedule, the railway property and the transportation efficiency. Comprehensive Transportation, 11, 13-17.
Mi L., Xia W., & Xianjun G. (2011). Travel route model under traffic congestion environment based on reliability, AISS, 3(8), 179-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.4156/aiss.vol3.issue8.22
Minghui L., & Jian Z. (2008). Synergy value: Crucial reason for difficulty of railway investing and financing in China. Comprehensive Transportation, 5, 9-14.
Wenxin L., Liang F., & Benshan S. (2010). Analysis based on the financing difficulties of locked-in joint-venture railway. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2, 53-55.
Xiaodong Z., Hongcheng G., Chen L., & Chongjun F. (2012). Modeling traffic model driven route choice simulator in UML, JDCTA, 6(5), 141-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.4156/jdcta.vol6.issue5.17

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com