You are here

Home » Content

İLKÖĞRETİM 4. SINIF FEN VE TEKNOLOJİ DERSİ ÖĞRETİMİNDE UYGULANAN JİGSAW VE GRUP ARAŞTIRMASI TEKNİKLERİNİN ÖĞRENCİLERİN AKADEMİK BAŞARILARI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Journal Name:

  • Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of the study is to determine the effects of Group Study, Jigsaw Techniques and conventional teaching methods that are used in cooperative learning method in the fourth grade primary education students’ who have taken science and technology course academic achievement and these students’ views about these techniques. The students were randomly divided into an experimental group I with 16 students, experimental group II with 16 students and a control group with 13 students. Among the cooperative learning techniques, Group Study Technique was used to the experimental group I, Jigsaw Technique was applied to the experimental group II and the conventional teaching methods were used in the control group. According to these findings, group study and jigsaw techniques, in the fourth grade primary education science and technology course, appear to be more effective than conventional teaching methods and group study technique seems to be more effective than jigsaw technique.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ilkogretim-4.sinif-fen-teknoloji-dersi-ogretiminde-uygulanan-jigsaw-grup-arastirmasi-tekniklerinin-ogrencilerin-akademik-basarilari-uzerine-etkisi.pdf
  • 1
80-92
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Abordo, I. & Gaikwad, S. (2005). Group investigation. How Does It Work? International Forum, 8 (1, 2), 79-98.
Açıkgöz, K. (1992). İşbirlikli öğrenme: Kuram-Araştırma-Uygulama. Malatya: Uğurel Matbaası.
Akgün, Ş. (2001). Fen bilgisi öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Avcı, S. ve Fer, S. (2004). Birleştirme II tekniği ile oluşturulan işbirliğine dayalı öğrenme ortamının öğrenciler
üzerindeki etkisi, Kartal Mesleki Eğitim Merkezi'nde bir durum çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 29 (134), 61-74.
Avşar, Z. ve Alkış, S. (2007). İşbirlikli öğrenme yöntemi birleştirme-I tekniğinin sosyal bilgiler derslerinde öğrenci
başarısına etkisi. İlköğretim Online, 6 (2), 197-203.
Bakır, A. (2007). Sergiledikleri demokratik tutum ve davranışlar açısından ilköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin
değerlendirilmesi (Malatya ili örneği). Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İnönü Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Malatya.
Bilen, K. (2004). Fen bilgisi öğretmenleri ile fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının etkili fen öğretimi ve öğretmen ile
ilgili görüşleri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Denizli.
Bolling, A. (1994). Using group journals to improve writing and comprehension. Journal On Excellence In
College Teaching, 5 (1), 47-55.
Brooks, J.G. & Brooks, M.G. (1993). In search of understanding, the case for constructivist classrooms.
Alexandria, VA: Association For Supervision And Curriculum Development.
Brooks, M.G. & Brooks, J.G. (1999). The constructivist classroom. The Courage To Be Constructivist, Educational
Leadership, 57, 18-24.
Brufee, K. (1993). Collaborative learning. Higher education, interdependence and the authority of knowledge.
Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press. U.S.A.
Doymuş, K. ve Şimşek, Ü. (2007). Kimyasal bağların öğretilmesinde jigsaw tekniğinin etkisi ve teknikle ilgili
öğrenci görüşleri. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 173 (1), 231–243.
Doymus, K. (2007). Effects of a cooperative learning strategy on teaching and learning phases of matter and
one-component phase diagrams. Journal Of Chemical Education, 84 (11), 1857-1860.
Doymus, K. (2008). Teaching chemical equilibrium with the jigsaw technique. Research In Science Education, 38
(2), 249-260.
Doymuş, K., Şimşek, Ü. ve Karaçöp, A. (2007). The effect of cooperative and traditional method on students’
achievements, ıdentifications and use of laboratory equipments in general chemistry laboratory course.
Eurasian Journal Of Educational Research, 28, 31-43.
Eilks, I. (2005). Experiences and reflections about teaching atomic structure in a jigsaw classroom in lower
secondary school chemistry lessons. Journal Of Chemical Education, 82 (2), 313-319.
Ghaith, G. & El-Malak, M.A. (2004). Effect of jigsaw ii on literal and higher order EFL reading comprehension.
Educational Research And Evaluation, 10 (2), 105-115.
Gillies, R.M. (2006). Teachers' and students' verbal behaviors during cooperative and small-group learning.
British Journal Of Educational Psychology, 76 (2), 271-287.
Hennessy, D. & Evans, R. (2006). Small-group learning in the community college classroom. The Community
College Enterprise, 12 (1), 93-110.
Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1992). Approaches to implementing cooperative learning in the social studies
classroom, cooperative learning in the social studies classroom. In R.J., Stahl ve R.L., Vansicle (Eds.), An
invitation social study (87, p. 44-51). Washington National Council For The Social Studies.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. & Smith, K. (1991). Cooperative learning. Increasing college faculty instructional
productivity. Ashe-Eric Higher Education Report (No:4). Washington, DC: The George Washington Universtiy.
Kılıç, D. (2008). The effect of the jigsaw technique on learning the concepts of the principles and methods of
teaching. World Applied Sciences Journal, 4 (Supple 1), 109-114.
Koç, Y. (2009). Termokimya ve kimyasal kinetik konularının öğretiminde uygulanan jigsaw ve grup araştırması
tekniklerinin öğrencilerin akademik başarıları üzerine etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen
Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
Kurt, I. (2001). Fen eğitiminde işbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin öğrencilerin başarısına, kavram öğrenmesine ve
hatırlamasına etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
Özden, Y. (2003). Öğrenme ve öğretme. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Özmen, H. (2004). Fen öğretiminde öğrenme teorileri ve teknoloji destekli yapılandırmacı (constructivist)
öğrenme. The Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Tecnology-TOJET, 3 (1). ISSN: 1303–652, Article 14. Web:
www. tojet.net/articles/3114.html adresinden 13 Temmuz 2010’da alınmıştır.
Passi, A. & Vahtivuori, S. (2001). From cooperative learning towards communalism. Media Education
Publication, 8, 256-272.
Saban, A. (2002). Öğrenme öğretme süreci yeni teori ve yaklaşımlar. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti.
Shackar, H. & Fischer, S. (2004). Cooperative learning and the achievement of motivation and perceptions of
students in 11th grade chemistry classes. Learning And Instruction, 14, 69-87.
Souvignier, E. & Kronenberger, J. (2007). Cooperative learning in third graders’ jigsaw groups for mathematics
and science with and without questioning training. British Journal Of Educational Psychology, 77, 755-771.
Sprague & Dede (1999). Constructivisim in the classroom. If i teach this way, am i doing my job? Learning And
Leading With Tecnology, 27 (1), 16-17.
Stamovlasis, D., Dimos, A. & Tsaparlis, G. (2006). A study of group interaction processes in learning lower
secondary physic. Journal Of Research In Science
Teaching, 43 (6), 556-576.
Tsoi, M.F., Goh, N.K. & Chia, L.S. (2004). Using group investigation for chemistry in teacher education (Bildiri).
Asia-Pacific Forum On Science Learning And Teaching, 5, Issue 1 (6), 1-12.
Yeşil, R. (2004). İnsan hakları ve demokrasi eğitiminde yöntem. Gazi Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi
Dergisi, 5 (1), 35-41.
Yılmaz, A. (2001). İşbirliğine dayalı öğrenme. Etkili ancak ihmal edilen ya da yanlış kullanılan bir metot. MEB
Dergisi, Nisan, Mayıs, Haziran. Sayı:150.
Yılmaz, M. (2007). Görsel sanatlar eğitiminde işbirlikli öğrenme. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 5 (2), 747-756.
Zingaro, D. (2008). Group investigation. Theory and practice. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Institute For
Studies In Education.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com