You are here

THE ROLE OF INOVATION POLICIES IN SOUTH ASIAN INDUSTRIALIZATION: THE CASE OF KOREA

THE ROLE OF INOVATION POLICIES IN SOUTH ASIAN INDUSTRIALIZATION: THE CASE OF KOREA

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The main aim of this study is introducing historical, political and cultural dimensions of South Korean industrialization, without leaving aside the economic perspective as one of the explanatory factor. In the investigation of industrialization, the majority of the researches focused only on conducted economic policies as an explanatory factor of the rapid growth in South Korea. However Asian societies’ communal tradition and institutions provided a suitable ground for strong developmental government to stay in power during the industrialization process in the South Korea. Consequently the ability to make especially long-term economic policy projections in turn allowed policy decision makers to form entire economy in accordance with the developmental goals in the South Korea.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın temel amacı açıklayıcı faktörlerden biri olarak ekonomik bakışı gözardı etmeden Güney Kore sanayileşmesinin tarihsel, politik ve kültürel boyutlarını ortaya koymaktır. Güney Kore’deki sanayileşmenin incelenmesi esnasında araştırmacıların çoğunluğu sadece uygulanan ekonomik politikalara odaklanmışlardır. Oysa ki Asya toplumlarının komünal gelenekleri ve kurumları sanayileşme süreçleri boyunca güçlü kalkınmacı hükümetlerin iktidarda kalması için uygun bir ortam sağlamıştır. Dolayısıyla özellikle uzun dönemli politikaları belirleme olanağına sahip olmaları, politika karar alıcılarının bütün bir ekonomiyi Güney Kore’nin kalkınmacı amaçları doğrultusunda biçimlendirmelerine izin vermiştir.
135-141

REFERENCES

References: 

Amsden, A. H., “Asia’s Next Giant, South Korea
and Late Industrialization, New York, 1989, Oxford
University Press.
Bardhan, Pranab. “The Economics of Corruption
in Less Developed Countries: A Rewiev of Issues”,
1996, Center for International and Development
Economics Research (CIDER) Working Papers, C96-
064, University of California at Berkeley.
Choi, H.S., “Transition from imitation to creation”,
Technological Forecasting and Social Change 33
(1989), 209-215.
Hiwaki, Kensei., 1998, “Sustainable Development:
framework for a General Theory” Human Systems
Management, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p267.
Jones, L. P. & Sakong, I., “ Government,
Business and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development:
The Korean Case”, 1980, Harvard University
Concil on East Asian Studies, Harvard East Asian
Mongrphs, no.91, Cambridge.
Keller, Wolfgang “Do Trde Patterns and Technology
Flows Affect Productivity Growth?”, The
World Bank Economic Reviev, Vol.14, No.1: 17-47
Kim, L.,“National system of industrial innovation:
dynamics of capability building in Korea, in: National
Innovation Systems”, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, 1993.
Kim, L., “Technology policies and strategies for
developing countries: lessons from the Korean
experience”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,
Sep. 98, Vol. 10 Issue 3, Item Number:
1189509 p.311-324
Koo, Hagen., “The Politcal Economy of Income
Distribution in South Korea: The İmpact of the State’s
Industrialization Policies”, 1984, World Development,
12, No.10, pp. 1029-1037.
Nelson, Richard R., 1993, “National Innovation
Systems, A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University
Press.
OECD, Rewievs of National Science and Technology
Policy: Republic of Korea, OECD, Paris,1996.
Simon, D.F. “Strategic Underpinnings of Electronics
Industry in the Newly Industrialized Economies
of Asia”, 1993, Wellenius, B., Miller, A. And
Dahlman, C.J. Edition
YILMAZ, Gaye., 1998, Sermaye Savaşları Şekil
mi Değiştiriyor? Asya Krizi!, İktisat Dergisi, 1998,
sayı:381, s.35)

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com