You are here

Home » Content

Price Yasası ve Türkiye’de Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Literatürü

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Araştırmaları Dergisi

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Definition: Price’s law argues that about half of all the papers in a given discipline will be published by a number of authors equal to the square root of the total number of those who publish in the discipline. Purpose: The purpose of the study is to discuss the meaning, the character and the applicability of Price’s law. Method: After being mentioned the meaning and the character of Price’s law in our study, an example was given to test the applicability of the law. In our example, Price’s law was applied to the literature of intellectual property rights between 1727-2002 in Turkey. For our example, we used the bibliography entitled “Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri, Sınai Mülkiyet ve Rekabet Hukuku Bibliyografyası1727- 2002” prepared by Prof.Ejder Yılmaz and his group. Findings: In the result of our study, it was determined that the observed data from the literature of intellectual property rights between 1727-2002 in Turkey do not support Price’s law.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Tanım: Price yasası, belli bir disiplindeki yazıların yarısının, o alanda yazı yazan yazarların toplam sayısının kareköküne eşit yazarlarca üretileceğini ileri sürmektedir. Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, Price yasasının anlamını, niteliğini ve uygulanabilirliğini irdelemektir. Yöntem: Araştırmamızda Price yasasının anlamına ve niteliğine değinildikten sonra bu yasanın uygulanabilirliğini test etmek amacıyla bir örnek verilmiştir. Örneğimizde Price yasası, 1727-2002 yılları arasında Türkiye’deki fikri mülkiyet hakları literatürüne uygulanmıştır. Örnek uygulamamız için Prof.Dr. Ejder Yılmaz’ın ekibiyle hazırladıkları “Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri, Sınai Mülkiyet ve Rekabet Hukuku Bibliyografyası 1727-2002” isimli bibliyografyadan yararlanılmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırmamızın sonucunda 1727-2002 yılları arasında Türkiye’deki fikri mülkiyet hakları literatüründen gözlemlenen verilerin Price yasasını desteklemediği saptanmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_190878_1_pp_23-38.pdf
  • 1
23-38
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Allison, P., Price, Derek de Solla, Griffith, B., Moravcsik, M. and Stewart, J. (1976). “Lotka’s
law : a problem in its interpretation and application”, Social Studies of Science 6 (2):
269-276.
Baker, J. Robertson, Wilson, J. and Sedgwick, W. (2003). “Publishing productivity in sport
psychology 1970-2000: an exploratory examination of the Lotka-Price law” Journal of
Sport & Exercise Psychology 25: 477-483.
“Coğrafi işaretlerinin korunması hakkında kanun hükmünde kararname“, Karar
Sayısı:KHK/555, Resmî Gazete, Karar No: 22326, 27.6.1995.
David, Paul (1994). “Positive feedbacks and research productivity in science: reopening
another black box”, Economics of Technology. Ed. Ove Granstrand. Amsterdam:
Elsevier Science.
Dean, Keith (1999). “Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: is the creative
process Darwinian?” Psychological Inquiry. 10 (4): 309-328.
Dutton, Denis (2001). “What is genius?” Philosophy and Literature 25: 181-196.
Egghe, L. (2005). “Zipfian and Lotkaian continuous concentration theory,” Journal of the
American Society for Information Science, 59 (9): 935-945.
Egghe, L. (1987). “An exact calculation of Price’s law for the law of Lotka”, Scientometrics
11 (1-2): 81-97.
Egghe, L. and Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: quantitative methods in
library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Egghe, L. and Rousseau, R. (1986). “A characterization of distributions which satisfy Price’s
Law and consequences for the laws of Zipf and Mandelbrot”, Journal of Information
Science 12: 193-197.
“Endüstriyel tasarımların korunması hakkında kanun hükmünde kararname“, Karar
Sayısı:KHK/554, Resmî Gazete, Karar No: 22326, 27.6.1995.
Fernandez-Cano, A., Torralbo, M. and Vallejo, M. (2004). “Reconsidering Price’s model of
scientific growth: an overview”, Scientometrics, 61 (3): 301-321.
Furner, Jonathan (2003a). “Little book, big book: before and after little science, big science: a
review article, part I,” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 35 (2): 115-
125.
14
Furner, Jonathan (2003b). “Little book, big book: before and after little science, big science: a
review article, part II,” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 35 (3): 189-
201.
Geisler, Eliezer (2002). “What do we know about: R&D metrics in technology-driven
organizations” [Çevrimiçi] http://ciss.ncsu.edu/documents/rdmetrics.pdf [5 Eyül 2005]
Glänzel, W. and Schubert, A. (1985). “Price distribution: an exact formulation of Price’s
square root law“ Scientometrics 7 (3-4): 212-219.
Gupta, B. Sharma, L. and Kumar, S. (1998). “Literature growth and author productivity
patterns in Indian physics”, Information Processing & Management, 34 (1): 121-131.
Holub, H., Tappeiner, G. and Eberharter, V. (1991). “The iron law of important articles,”
Southern Economic Journal 58 (2): 317-328.
Klamer, Arjo and Dalen, H. (2002). “Attention and the art of scientific publishing,” Journal of
Economic Methodology 9 (3): 289-315.
Kochen, Manfred (1984). “Toward a paradigm for information science: the influence of
Derek de Solla Price” Journal of tne American Society for Information Science, 35
(3):147-148.
Lopez-Munoz, F., Alamo, C., Rubio, G., Garcia, P., Aguera, B. and Cuenca, E. (2003).
“Bibliometric analysis of biomedical publications on SSRIs during 1980-2000”
Depression and Anxiety, 18: 95-103.
“Markaların korunması hakkında kanun hükmünde kararname“, Karar Sayısı:KHK/556,
Resmî Gazete, Karar No: 22326, 27.6.1995.
Nicholls, P.T. (1988). “Price’s square root law: empirical validity and relation to Lotka’s
law,“ Information Processing & Management 24 (4): 469-477.
O’Connor, J., French, R., Sherrill, C. and Babcock, G. (2001). “Scholarly productivity in
adapted physical activity pedagogy: a bibliometric analysis” Adapted Physical Activity
Quarterly 18 (4): 434-450.
“Patent haklarının korunması hakkında kanun hükmünde kararname“, Karar Sayısı:KHK/551,
Resmî Gazete, Karar No: 22326, 27.6.1995.
Price, Derek de Solla (1986). Little science, big science and beyond. New York: Columbia
University.
Price, Derek de Solla (1976). “A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative
advantage processes,” Journal of tne American Society for Information Science, 27 (5):
292-306.
15
Price, Derek de Solla (1971). “Some remarks on elitism in information and the invisible
college phenomenon in science” Journal of tne American Society for Information
Science, 22: 74-75.
Rousseau, J.J. (1968). “The social contract or principles of political right,” 1762. Çev. G.
Cole. Book III, Chapter I [Çevrimiçi] http://www.constitution.org/jjr/socon_03.htm#001
[5 Eylül 2005]
Sever, Brion (2005). “Ranking multiple authors in criminal justice scholarship: an
examination of underlying issues,” Journal of Criminal Education, 16 (1): 79-100.
Simonton, Dean (2003). “Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: the
integration of product, person and process perspectives,” Psychological Bulletin, 129
(4): 475-494.
Wray, Srad (2005). “Rethinking scientific specialization,” Social Studies of Science, 35
(1):151-164.
“WTO, Intellectual property, what are intellectual property rights?,”
[Çevrimiçi]http://www.wto.org/english/ tratop_e/trips_e/intel1_e.htm 22.12.2005.
Yılmaz, Ejder, Görmez, Günay, Dilek, Baytan, Abacıoğlu, Özlem ve Çağlar, Tacar. (2002).
Fikir ve sanat eserleri, sınai mülkiyet ve rekabet hukuku bibliyografyası 1727-2002.
Ankara: Ankara Barosu.
Yılmaz, Murat. (2002.). “Lotka yasası ve Türkiye’de kütüphane ve bilgi bilimi literatürü,”
Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 16 (1) 2002: 61-69.
Teşekkür: Yapıcı eleştirilerinden dolayı anonim hakemlere teşekkür ederim.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com