Empirical Relationship for Estimation of Mechanical Soil Properties in Local Ground Responds Analysis

[1] Tezcan.S.S, Kaya, Engin Bal.I, Ozdemir.Z.2002.Seismic amplification at Avcilar, Istanbul.Engineering Structures (24),661-667.
[2] Kockar. M.K, Akgun. H, Rathje.E.M.2010. Evaluation of site conditions for Ankara Basin of Turkey based on seismic site characterization of near-surface geologic materials, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering(30),8-20.
[3] Yang, Z., Numerical Analysis of Permafrost Effects on the Seismic Site Response, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31, 2011, pp. 282–290.
[4] Phanikanth, V.S. and Rami Reddy, G., Equiva- lent Linear Seismic Ground Response Analysis of Some Typical Sites in Mumbai, Geotech Geol Eng , 29, 2011, pp. 1109–1126.
[5] Goda K. Nonlinear response potential of mainshock–aftershock sequences from Japanese earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2012;102(5):2139 -56.
[6] Cadet H, Bard P-Y, Rodriguez-Marek A. Site effect assessment using KiK-net data: Part 1—A simple correction procedure for surface/downhole spectral ratios. Bull Earthquake Eng 2012:421–4810(2) 2012:421–48.
[7] Zahedi-Khameneh A, Scherer RJ, Zaré M. A non-parametric wave type based model for real-time prediction of strong ground motion accelerogram. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2013;49:181–96.
[8] Louie J.N. (2001). Faster, better: shear-wave velocity to 100 meters depth from refraction microtremor arrays, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 91(2): 347-364.
[9] Cox B.R., Beekman A.N. (2011). Intramethod variability in ReMi dispersion measurements and V S estimates at shallow bedrock sites, ASCE, J. Geotech. Eng., 137(4): 354–362.
[10] Robertson P.K. (2009). Interpretation of cone penetration tests-a unified approach, Canadian Geotech. J. 46(11): 1337-1355.
[11] Brandenberg S.J., Bellana N., Shantz T. (2010). Shear wave velocity as a function of standard penetration test resistance and vertical effective stress at California bridge sites, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 30(10): 1026–1035.
[12] Toro G.R. (1995). Probabilistic models of site velocity profiles for generic and site-specific ground-motion amplification studies, Technical Report No. 779574, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY.
[13] Seed H.B., Idriss I.M. (1970). Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses, Report No. UCB/EERC-70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
[14] Iwasaki T., Tatsuoka F., Takagi Y. (1978). Shear modulus of sands under torsional shear loading, Soils and Foundations, 18(1): 39-56.
[15] Vucetic M., Dobry R. (1991). Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response, ASCE, J. Geotech. Eng., 117(1): 89–107.Darendeli M.B. (2001). Development of a New Family of Normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves, PhD Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
[16] Asonuma T, Miura S, Yagi K, Tanaka H (2002) Dynamic deformation characteristics of volcanic soils and their evaluation methods. J Geotech Eng, Proc JSCE 708, III-59:161–173
[17] Building Research Institute, Land, Infrastructure and Transportation Ministry (2001) Technical background on structural aspect of revision of the Building Standard Law. Gyousei, Tokyo
[18] Central Disaster Prevention Council (2005) Report of the 10th meeting of Task force on countermeasures against Tokai earthquake
[19] Editorial Committee on Dynamic Analysis of Ground – from Foundation to Application (2007) Dynamic analysis of ground -from fundamental to application, JGS, Tokyo, 152 pp
[20] Fujikawa T, Hayashi Y, Fukutake K (2000) Study for the effect of the nonlinearity of engineering bedrock on the seismic response of surface ground, Summaries of the technical papers of annual meeting of AIJ (Tohoku), pp 297–298
[21] Fukumoto S, Yoshida N, Sahara M (2009) Dynamic deformation characteristics of sedimentary soft rock. J JAEE 9(1):46–64
[22] Ishihara K, Kokusho T, Tsutsumi C, Ishida H (2003) Study on dynamic properties of highly organic soil. In: Proceedings of the 58th annual conference of the Japan Society of civil engineering, JSCE, Tokyo, vol 3, pp 167–168
[23] Japanese Geotechnical Society (2004) Remedial measures against soil liquefaction. Geotechnical engineering practice series 18, 513 p
[24] Ministerial Notification 1457 on Building Standard Law (2000) Appendix table Nishi Y (1980) SPT N-value in soil ground. In: Proceedings of symposium on sounding, JGS, pp 109–114
[25] Wakamatsu K, Yoshida N, Mikami T (2010) Controlling factors and effect of geologic age and depositional environment on cyclic shear deformation characteristics of soils. Japan Geotech J 5(3):463–478
[26] Yoshida N (2001) Effect of nonlinear behavior of seismic base layer on evaluation of level 2 ground motion. In: Proceedings of first annual meeting of JAEE, IAEE, Tokyo, p 37 (in Japanese)
International Journal of Science and Engineering Investigations, Volume 6, Issue 69, October 2017 101
www.IJSEI.com Paper ID: 66917-14
ISSN: 2251-8843
[27] Yoshida N, Wakamatsu K (2010) Statistical characteristics of sand for liquefaction potential evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 45th Japan national conference on geotechnical engineering, JGS, Tokyo, pp 337–338
[28] Imai T, Tonouchi K (1982a) Correlation of N value with S-wave velocity. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European symposium on penetration testing, Amsterdam, pp 67–72
[29] Zen K, Yamazaki H, Umehara Y (1987a) Experimental stud on shear modulus and damping ratio of natural deposits for seismic response analysis. Report of the Port and harbour Research Institute, Ministry of Transport 28(1):41–113
[30] Yoshida, N. (2015). Seismic Ground Response Analysis. Springer.