You are here

EXTENDED RELEASE ORAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Extended release formulations make the drug available over extended time period after oral administration. The extended release product will optimize therapeutic effect and safety of a drug at the same time improving the patient convenience and compliance. By incorporating the dose for 24 hrs into one tablet/ca psule from which the drug is released slowly. This formulation helps to avoid the side effects associated with low and high concentrations. The ideal drug delivery system should show a constant zero-order release rate and maintain the constant plasma concentrations. The extended release formulations may maintain therapeutic concentrations over prolonged periods. The use of extended release formulations avoids the high blood concentration. Extended release formulations have the potential to improve the patient compliance, reduce the toxicity by slowing drug absorption, Minimize drug accumulation with chronic dosing, Usage of less total drug and reduce the dose frequency, Improvement the bioavailability of some drugs. This article provides an overview of design and fabrication of extended release system and in-vitro performance of extended release formulation.

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Pfizer, Detrol® L.A. tolterodine tartrate extended release capsule, http://www.drugbank.ca/system/fda labels/ DB01036.pdf). Accessed October 2011.
2. Ehab Ahmed MH. Ph.D. Thesis: Application and evaluation of extended release technology to loop diuretics. University of Cincinnati (2002): 78-82..
3. Madhusudhan P and Nazeer S: Extended release formulation. International Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2010; 2: 625¬684.
4. Donald Wise. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Controlled Release Technology, Marcel Dekker Inc, London, First Edition (2000) : 431-465.
5. Santus G and Baker R: Osmotic drug delivery, a review of the patent literature. Journal of Control Release 1995; 35: 1-21.
6. Alfred Martin. Physical Pharmacy, Physical Chemical Principles in the Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lea & Fabiger, Fourth Edition (1993): 532-536.
7. James McGinity. Aqueous Polymeric Coatings for Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms,
Marcel Dekker Inc, Second Edition (1997): 1-474.
8. Bodmeier R: Tableting of coated pellets, review. Europian Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 1997; 43: 1-8.
9. Bechgaard H and Nielsen G: Controlled-release multiple-units and single-unit doses a literature review. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 1978; 4: 53 - 67.
10. Ghebre-Sellassie. Multiparticulate Oral Drug Delivery, Marcel Dekker Inc, First
Edition (1997): 79-355.
11. Karrout Y, Neut C, Wils D and Siepmann F: Novel polymeric film coatings for colon targeting Drug release from coated pellets. Europian Journal of Pharmaceutical
Science 2009; 37: 427-433.
12. Pearnchob N. Ph.D. Thesis: Evaluation of new film coating processes and materials. University of Berlin (2002): 45-48.
13. Varshosaz J, Kennedy RA and Gipps EM: Use of enteric polymers for production of microspheres by extrusion-spheronization. Pharm Acta Helv 1997; 72:
145-152.
14. Bianchini R, Bruni G, Gazzaniga A and Vecchio C: Influence of extrusionspheronization processing on the physical properties of d-Indobufen pellets containing pH adjusters. Drug Development
and Industrial Pharmacy 1992; 18: 1485¬1503.
15. Glaessl B, Siepmann F, Tucker I and Siepmann J: Characterization of quaternary polymethacrylate films containing tartaric acid, metoprolol free base or metoprolol tartrate. Europian Journal of Pharmacy and Biopharmaceutics 2009; 73: 366-372.
16. Jenquin MR and McGinity JW:
Characterization of acrylic resin matrix films and mechanisms of drug-polymer interactions. International Journal of
Pharmceutics 1994; 101: 23-34.
17. Huang X and Brazel C: On the importance and mechanisms of burst release in matrix-controlled drug delivery systems. Journal of Control Release 2001; 73: 121¬136.
18. Scott DC and Hollenbeck RG: Design and manufacture of a zero-order sustained-release pellet dosage form through non uniform drug distribution in a diffusional matrix. Pharmaceutical Research 1991; 8:
156-161.
ISSN: 2277-8713
IJPRBS
19. Rahman NU and Yuen KH: Eudragit
NE40-drug mixed coating system for controlling drug release of core pellets. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 2005; 31: 339 -347.
20. Rahman NU, Yuen KH, Khan NA and
Woei WJ: Drug-polymer mixed coating: a new approach for controlling drug release rates in pellets. Pharmceutical Development
and Technology 2006; 11: 71-77.
21. Peppas N: Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers. Pharm
Acta Helv 1985; 60: 110-111.
22. Ritger P and Peppas N: A simple equation for description of solute release I, Fickian and non-Fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. Journal of
Control Release 1987; 5: 23-36.
23. Siepmann J and Siepmann F: Mathematical modeling of drug delivery. International. Journal of Pharmacy 2008;
364: 328-343.
24. Lippold BC and Monells PR: Control
and stability of drug release from diffusion pellets coated with the aqueous quaternary polymethacrylate dispersion Eudragit RS 30
D. Pharmazie 2001; 56: 477-483.25. Ozturk AG, Ozturk SS, Palsson BO and Dressman JB: Mechanism of release from pellets coated with an ethylcellulose-based film. Journal of Control Release 1990; 14: 203-213.
26. Munday DL and Fassihi AR: Controlled release delivery: Effect of coating composition on release characteristics of mini-tablets. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1989; 52: 109-114.
27. Sadeghi F, Ford J and Rajabi-Siahboomi A: The influence of drug type on the release profiles from Surelease-coated pellets. International Journal of
Pharmaceutics 2003; 254: 123-135.
28. Kallai N, Luhn O, Dredan J and Antal I: Evaluation of drug release from coated pellets based on isomalt, sugar, and microcrystalline cellulose inert cores. AAPS Pharmaceutical Science Technology 1982;
11: 383-391.
29. Frohoff-Hulsmann MA, Lippold BC and McGinity JW: Aqueous ethyl cellulose dispersion containing plasticizers of different water solubility and hydroxypropyl methyl-cellulose as coating material for diffusion pellets II, properties of sprayed films. Europian Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 1999; 48: 67-75.
ISSN: 2277-8713
IJPRBS
30. Bodmeier R and Paeratakul O: Dry and wet strengths of polymeric films prepared from an aqueous colloidal polymer dispersion, Eudragit RS30D. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1993; 96: 129-138.
31. Tang L, Schwartz J, Porter S and Wigent R: Drug release from film-coated chlorpheniramine maleate nonpareil beads, effect of water-soluble polymer, coating level, and soluble core material. Pharmaceutical Development and
Technology 2000; 5: 383-390.
32. Sadeghi F, Ford J and Rubinstein MH: Comparative Study of Drug Release from Pellets Coated with HPMC or Surelease. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy
2000; 26: 651-660.
33. Bodmeier R and Paeratakul O: Dry and wet strengths of polymeric films prepared from an aqueous colloidal polymer dispersion, Eudragit RS30D. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1993; 96: 129-138.
34. Siepmann F, Siepmann J, Walther M, MacRae R and Bodmeier R: Blends of aqueous polymer dispersions used for pellet coating, Importance of the particle size. Journal of Control Release 2005; 105: 226¬239.35.
Bhattacharjy
a S and Wurster D: Investigation of the Drug Release and Surface Morphological Properties of Film-Coated Pellets, and Physical, Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Free Films as a Function of Various Curing Conditions. AAPS Pharmaceutical Science and Tecnology 2008; 9: 449-457.
36.
Li
n AY, Muhammad NA and Augsburger LL: A Study of the Effects of Curing and Storage Conditions on Controlled Release Diphenhydramine HCl Pellets Coated with Eudragit®NE30D. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology 2003; 8: 277 - 287.
37.
Williams-II
I RO and Liu J: Influence of processing and curing conditions on beads coated with an aqueous dispersion of cellulose acetate phthalate. Europian Journal of Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics 2000;
49: 243-252.
38.
Amigh
i K and Moes A: Influence of plasticizer concentration and storage conditions on the drug release rate from Eudragit RS 30D film-coated sustainedrelease theophylline pellets. Europian Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 1996; 42: 29-35.
ISSN: 2277-8713
IJPRBS
39. Yang QW, Flament MP, Siepmann F,
Herry C and Tchoreloff P: Curing of aqueous polymeric film coatings: Importance of the coating level and type of plasticizer. Europian Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2010;
74: 362-370.
40. Siepmann F, Siepmann J, Walther M, MacRae R and Bodmeier R: Aqueous HPMCAS coatings Effects of formulation and processing parameters on drug release and mass transport mechanisms. Europian Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2006; 63: 262-269.
41. Wu C and McGinity J: Influence of relative humidity on the mechanical and drug release properties of theophylline pellets coated with an acrylic polymer containing methylparaben as a non-traditional plasticizer. Europian Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2000;
50: 277-284.
42. Liu J and Williams R: Properties of heat-humidity cured cellulose acetate phthalate free films. Europian Journal of Pharmaceutical Science 2002; 17: 31-41.
43. Kranz H and Gutsche S: Evaluation of the drug release patterns and long term stability of aqueous and organic coatedpellets by using blends of enteric and gastrointestinal insoluble polymers. International journal of Pharmaceutics 2009;
380: 112-119.
44. Azarmi S, Roa W and Lobenberg R: Current perspectives in dissolution testing of conventional and novel dosage forms. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2007;
328: 12-21.
45. Gu CH, Gandhi RB, Tay LK and
Raghavan K: Importance of using physiologically relevant volume of dissolution medium to correlate the oral exposure of formulations of BMS-480188 mesylate." International Journal of
Pharmaceutics 2004; 269: 195-202.
46. Royce A, Li S, Weaver M and Shah U:
In vivo and in vitro evaluation of three controlled release principles of 6-N-cyclohexyl-2'-O-methyladenosine. Journal
of. Control Release 2004; 97: 79-90.
47. Qureshi SA: Developing discriminatory drug dissolution tests and profiles: some thoughts for consideration on the concept and its interpretation. Dissolution
Technology 2006; 13: 18-23.
ISSN: 2277-8713
IJPRBS
48. Emami J: In vitro - in vivo correlation: from theory to applications. Journal of Pharmaceutical Science 2006; 9: 169-189.
49. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
(CDER), Guidance for Industry, SUPAC-
MR: Modified Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms,
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guida nceComplianceRegulatoryInformati on/Guidances/ucm070640.pdf). Accessed November 2011.
50. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Guidance for Industry, Waiver of In Vivo Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System, (http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guida ncecomplianceregulatoryinformation /guidances/ucm070246.pdf). Accessed November 2011.
51. Dressman JB, Amidon GL and Shah VP: Dissolution testing as a prognostic tool for oral drug absorption: immediate release dosage forms. Pharmaceutical Research
1998; 15: 11-22.52. Schiller C, Frohlich C, Giessmann T, Siegmund W and Weitschies W: Intestinal fluid volumes and transit of dosage forms as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Aliment Pharmacology and Therapeutics
2005; 22: 971-979.
53. Ibekwe VC, Fadda HM, McConnell EL, Khela MK and Basit AW: Interplay
Between Intestinal pH, Transit Time and Feed Status on the In Vivo Performance of pH Responsive Ileo-Colonic Release Systems. Pharmaceutical Research 2008; 25:
1828-1835.
54. Kalantzi L, Goumas K, Kalioras V, Abrahamsson B and Reppas C: Characterization of the human upper gastrointestinal contents under conditions simulating bioavailability/bioequivalence studies. Pharmaceutical Research 2006; 23:
165-176.
55. TenHoor C, Bakatselou V and Dressman J: Solubility of mefenamic acid under simulated fed- and fasted-state conditions. Pharmaceutical Research 1991;
8: 1203-1205.
56. Kostewicz ES, Brauns U, Becker R and Dressman J: Forecasting the oral absorption behavior of poorly soluble weak bases using solubility and dissolution studies in
ISSN: 2277-8713
IJPRBS
biorelevant media. Pharmaceutical Research
2002; 19: 345-349.
57. Khan MZ: Dissolution testing for sustained or controlled release oral dosage forms and correlation with in vivo data, Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1996; 140: 131¬143.
58. Marvola M, Kannikoski A, Aito H and
Nykanen S: The effect of food on gastrointestinal transit and drug absorption of a multi particular sustained-release verapamil formulation. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1989; 53: 145-155.
59. Kenyon C, Hooper G, Tierney D, Butler J, Devane J and Wilding I: The effect of food on the gastrointestinal transit and systemic absorption of naproxen 107 from a novel sustained release formulation. Journal of Control Release 1995; 34: 31-36.
60. Fabre LF and Timmer CJ: Effects of food on the bioavailability of gepirone from extended-release tablets in humans, results of two open-label crossover studies. Current
Therapeutic Research 2003; 64: 580-598.
61. Developing Dissolution Tests for Modified Release Dosage Forms, General Considerations,(http://www.dissolutiontech.com/DTresour/ 299articles/299Crison.htm). Accessed October 2011.
ISSN: 2277-8713
IJPRBS
62. Porter CJ and Charman WN: In vitro
assessmen
t of oral lipid based formulations. Advanced Drug Delivery Review 2001; 50: S127-S147.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com