You are here

FACTORS THAT AFFECT STUDENTS’ PROGRESS AND THE COMPLETION RATE IN THE RESEARCH PROJECT: A CASE STUDY OF RESEARCH STUDENTS AND THEIR SUPERVISORS AT THE ZIMBABWE OPEN UNIVERSITY

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The question of why some distance education students in the Department of Education at the Zimbabwe Open University (ZOU) successfully complete their studies while others do not is becoming increasingly important as distance education moves from a marginal to an integral role in the provision of higher education. In order to unravel this issue and initiate some academic debate, the Department of Education at the ZOU mounted a national survey between June 2008 and July 2010 aimed at ascertaining the reasons for low completion rate among research students studying for the Bachelor of Education in Educational Management (B.Ed.- Educational Management). A survey of 100 research students was undertaken. Respondents were asked to identify and explain institutional and student- related factors that affected their progress and success in research projects. Major factors found to impact negatively on students’ progress included financial problems, lack of books and journals, poor communication and poor supervision by some tutors. Personal and domestic factors found to impact negatively on students successfulness included the following: financial problems, distance between the student and the Regional Centre and lack of technology. The present study recommended that ZOU needs to decentralize its operations to district centres so as to reduce distance between students and supervisors. Project Supervisors need thorough training for them to effectively assist students to throughout the project. The Library should offer inter-net facilities, relevant and recent book and journals.

REFERENCES

References: 

Beaudoin, M. (1990). The instructor's changing role in distance education. The American Journal of Distance
Education, 4 (2), 21-29.
Best, J. W. and Khan, J. V. (1993), Research in Education, New York, Longman.
Bogdan R. C. and Bilken S. K. (1992) Qualitative Research for Education. Boston Allyn and Bacon.
Calvert, J. (1986). Research in Canadian distance education. In I. Mugridge & D. Kaufman (Eds.), Distance
education in Canada (pp. 94–110). London: Croom Helm.
Carr, R. and F. Ledwith. (1980). Helping disadvantaged students. Teaching at a Distance 18 (Winter), 77–85..
Coldeway, D. O. (1982). Learner characteristics and success. In I. Mugridge & D. Kaufman (Eds.), Distance
Education in Canada (pp. 81–93). London: Croom Helm.
Galusha J M (1998), Barriers to Learning in Education, (ERIC Document reproduction Service No. 416377).
Garrison, D. R. (1987). Researching dropout in distance education. Distance Education, 8(1), 95–101.
Holmberg, B. (1986). Growth and Structure of Distance Education. London: Croon Helm.
Kangai,C.V.and Mapolisa,T.(2008).Citation Analysis of Research Projects Submitted by the Bachelor of
Education(EAPPS)Students(2000-2004)to the Department of Education at the Zimbabwe Open
University:Implications for Educators and Librarians.African Symposium Journal.Volume8,No.1,June 2008.
Keegan D (1986), The Foundations of Distance Education.London, Croom Helm.
Kennedy, D., & Powell, R. (1976, November). Student progress and withdrawal in the Open University. Teaching
at a Distance, 7, 61–75.
Knapper, C (1998), Life long learning and distance education, American Journal of Distance Education, 2(1), 63-
72.
Krathwohl D. R. (1985) Social and Behavoural Science Research. San Francisco, Jossey- Basssey.
Masenda, T. (2001) An Invesigation into Problems Faced by Distance Education Students in the Management of
Tutorials, Assignments and Examinations at the Zimbabwe Open University (unpublished Research Project).
Nunan, T., and Calvert, J. (1992). Quality and Standards in Distance Education. Unpublished report to the
National Distance Education Conference.
Nyawaranda V. A (2005) Supervising Research Projects/ Dissertations. A Paper delivered at the
ZOU,Bindura:Mashonaland Central Regional Centre,12 November 2005.
Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London, UK: Pinter
Publishers.
Ostman, R. E. and G. A. Wagner. (1987). New Zealand management students' perceptions of communication
technologies in correspondence education. Distance Education 8(l), 47–63.
Parlett, M. and Hamilton, D. (1977). Evaluation as illumination: a new approach to the study of innovatory
programmes. In: Hamilton, D. et al. (Eds.). Beyond the numbers game. London: Macmillan.
Pearce L. (2005) How to Examine a thesis. New York, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open
University Press.
Punch,K.F.(2004).Introduction to Social Qualitative and QuantitativeApproaches.London:Sage.
Rekkedal, T. (1983). Enhancing student progress in Norway. Teaching at a Distance 23 (Summer), 19–24.
Sung, N. (1986). Perceptions of Program and Learning Environment as Determinants of Persistence and Post
Study Attitudes in Adult Distance Learning. Unpublished D.Ed. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, P.A.
Taschian A. (1997), Research Proposal Basics, MKT 410- Spring 1997.
Thomas,J.R.and Nelson,J.K.(2001). Research Methods in Physical Activity(4
th
Edition).Albany:Human Kinetics.
Tuckman B. W. (1994) Conducting Educational Research. Orlando Florida, Harcot Place, College Publishers.
Woodley, A. and N. McIntosh. (1977). People who decide not to apply to the Open University. Teaching at a
Distance 9 (July), 18–26.
Woodley, A and Parlett, M.(1983).Book Teaching at a Distance :Issues in Distance Education. Open University
:UK.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com