You are here

http://www.ijmrhs.com/medical-research/the-quality-of-life-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-baghdad-2017-a-crosssectional-study.pdf

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Background: Many attempts were done to develop a method that actually reflects the sagittal jaw discrepancies without depending on cranial landmarks or dental occlusion. This study aimed to use one of these methods (dentoskeletal overjet) for assessing the sagittal jaw relationships of Iraqi adult sample with different skeletal jaw relationship. Materials and method: The sample consisted of 90 digital true lateral cephalometric radiographs of Iraqi individuals with no previous orthodontic treatment. Cephalometric analysis of skeletal sagittal jaw relationship -ANB angle, beta angle and Wits appraisal- will perform for everyone to divide the sample into three groups (skeletal class I, II, III) for which the dentoskeletal overjet will be measured. All cephalometric measurements will be done using AutoCAD. Results: Descriptive statistics of all variables with different skeletal jaw relationship showed that mean values of dentoskeletal overjet were (1.15, 3.91 and –2.01 mm) for skeletal class I, class II and class III jaw relationship respectively. Accurate reproducibility of dentoskeletal overjet in assessment of jaw skeletal relationship showed that the lowest value was for assessment of skeletal class III jaw relationship (73%) and the value for assessment of both skeletal class I and class II was higher (93%). Conclusions: Dentoskeletal overjet could be utilized in accurate representation of skeletal jaw relationship.
20
34

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Broadbent, B. Holly. “A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia.” The Angle Orthodontist Vol. 1,
No. 2, 1931, pp. 45-66.
[2] Hofrath, Herbert. “Die bedeutung der röntgenfern-und abstandsaufnahme für die diagnostik der
kieferanomalien.” Fortschritte der Orthodontik in Theorie und Praxis Vol. 1, No. 2, 1931, pp. 232-58.
[3] Baumrind, Sheldon, and David M. Miller. “Computer-aided head film analysis: The University of California San
Francisco method.” American Journal of Orthodontics Vol. 78, No. 1, 1980, pp. 41-65.
[4] Forsyth, D. B., et al. “Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, part 2: image quality.” The Angle
Orthodontist Vol. 66, No. 1, 1996, pp. 43-50.
[5] Riedel, Richard A. “The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion.” The
Angle Orthodontist Vol. 22, No. 3, 1952, pp. 142-45.
[6] Baik, Chong Yol, and Maria Ververidou. “A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: The Beta
angle.” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Vol. 126, No. 1, 2004, pp. 100-105.
[7] Jacobson, A. “The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony.” American Journal of Orthodontics Vol. 67, No. 2, 1975,
pp. 125-38.
[8] Chang, Hong-Po. “Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.” American Journal of Orthodontics and
Dentofacial Orthopedics Vol. 92, No. 2, 1987, pp. 117-22.
[9] Nanda, Ram S., and Robert M. Merill. “Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and
mandible.” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Vol. 105, No. 4, 1994, pp. 328-44.
[10] Ferrazzini, Guido. “Critical evaluation of the ANB angle.” American Journal of Orthodontics Vol. 69, No. 6,
1976, pp. 620-26.
[11] Bishara, Samir E., Julie A. Fahl, and Larry C. Peterson. “Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits
appraisal: clinical implications.” American Journal of Orthodontics Vol. 84, No. 2, 1983, pp. 133-39.
[12] Sherman, Stephen L., Michael Woods, and Ram S. Nanda. “The longitudinal effects of growth on the Wits
appraisal.” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Vol. 93, No. 5, 1988, pp. 429-36.
[13] AL-Hammadi. “Dentoskeletal overjet: A new method for assessment of sagittal jaw relation.” Australian Journal
of Basic and Applied Sciences Vol. 5, 2011, pp. 1830-36.
[14] Rakosi, Thomas. An Atlas and Manual of Cephalometric Radiography. Lea & Febiger, 1982.
[15] Downs, William B. “Variations in facial relationships: Their significance in treatment and prognosis.” American
Journal of Orthodontics Vol. 34, No. 10, 1948, pp. 812-40.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com