You are here

Home » Content

Factors influencing a student's decision to pursue a communications degree in Spain

Journal Name:

  • Intangible Capital

Publication Year:

  • 2012
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.277

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: This paper analyzes the factors that influence secondary school students’ choice of higher education options in Spain today and explores the implications and benefits of establishing provider-client relationships between universities and students. Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative approach using questionnaires to demonstrate the hypothesis and achieve the objectives. We have prepared a questionnaire via telematic LimeSurvey application consisting of twenty-four closed questions. Findings: Results depict that the leading criteria for Spanish students interested in pursuing studies in communication sciences were a university’s reputation and excellence and the quality of its educational programmes. In terms of sources of information related to universities and their degree programmes, Spanish communication sciences students placed the highest value on direct and experiential sources. Spanish students interested in pursuing degrees in communication sciences preferred public universities over private universities.Research limitations: It is a descriptive paper. The sample could have been larger and have covered the entire universe of communication schools in Spain. Practical implications: Gain in-depth insight into the academic, cultural, and sociodemographic characteristics of students who choose to pursue an undergraduate degree in communications sciences in Spain.Ascertain which sources of information proved to be the most valuable to prospective students in choosing a university and degree programme and the other factors that influenced their choices by means of a survey involving firstyear undergraduate communication sciences students. Use the results of this survey to rank the criteria used by students when choosing a university and degree programme. Gain a clearer picture of how parents and friends influence a student’s choice of degree programmes and universities. Social implications: Knowing the factors of choice and sources of information that define his choice of the University and the Faculty of Communication Sciences and analyze if there is an adequate marketing specifically university. Originality/value: Today’s universities must operate in much the same manner as businesses and corporations in order to survive. This new scenario pits one university against another in a race to attract the highest number of incoming students.Knowing the preferences of college-age students and the factors that influence their choice of a university has become increasingly crucial for institutions of higher education. This study sets out to determine not only the overall factors that determine a student’s choice in Spain, but also specifically what students who have chosen to pursue a university career in communications science look for when deciding where they will earn a degree in that discipline.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-factors-influencing-students-decision-pursue-communications-degree-spain.pdf
  • 1
43-60
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

ALIFF, J.V. (1998). Are students “customers” of collegiate education?. Annual General Meeting of the Georgia Academy of Science, 25 April, 1-10.
BALDWIN, G. (1994). The student as customer: the discourse of “quality” in higher education. Journal of Tertiary Education Administration, 16(1): 125-133.
BARLOVENTO COMUNICACIÓN (2010). Informe sobre las audiencias. http://tinyurl.com/76m3rcl - Accessed 10 May 2011.
Intangible Capital - http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.277
- 57 -
BEERLI, A.; DÍAZ, G. (2003). Los efectos de la imagen percibida de la universidad en la satisfacción de los estudiantes. Revista Española de Investigación de Marketing, ESIC, 7(1): 7-25.
CHAPMAN, R. (1986). Towards a theory of college selection: A model of college search and choice behaviour. Advances in Consumer Research, 13. Association for Consumer Research, Provo, Utah.
CHEN, W.W. (2009). Hospitality and tourism management education: An analysis of Chinese undergraduate students’ motives and institution choice criteria. http://tinyurl.com/6649zy5 Accessed 10 May 2011.
CHRISTOPHER, M.; PAYNE, A.; BALLANTYNE, D. (1991). Relationship Marketing. Butterworth-Heinemann.
COMM, C.L.; LABAY, D.G. (1996). Repositioning Colleges Using Changing Student Quality Perceptions: An Exploratory Analysis. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 7(4): 21-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J050v07n04_02
DAVIES, P.; SCRIBBINS, K. (1985). Marketing Further and Higher Education. Longman Group Ltd.
DECLARATION OF THE EUROPEAN MINISTERS OF EDUCATION CONVENED IN BOLOGNA (1999). http://tinyurl.com/6seums2 - Accessed 2 May 2011.
DEL OLMO ARRIAGA, J.L. (2009a). Els factors d’elecció d’Universitat: El cas de la demanda a Catalunya. [Doctoral thesis]. Universitat Abat Oliba CEU, Barcelona, Spain.
DEL OLMO ARRIAGA, J.L. (2009b). La elección de Universidad: factores de decisión y canales de información. Editorial CEU Ediciones.
DELMONICO, M.J. (2000). Is Treating Students as Customers the Right Move for Community Colleges?. St Petersburg Junior College, St Petersburg, FL, 1-16.
DRISCOLL, C.; WICKS, D. (1998). The Customer-Driven Approach in Business Education: a Possible Danger?. Journal of Education for Business, 74(1): 58-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08832329809601663
EUROPEAN COMMISSION COM (2002). European benchmarks in education and training: follow-up to the Lisbon European Council. The Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. 20-11-02.
Intangible Capital - http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.277
- 58 -
EUROPEAN COMMISSION COM (2003). The role of universities in “the Europe of Knowledge”. The Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. 05-02-03.
EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA (EHEA). Available online in: http://tinyurl.com/89hxk39. Accessed 15 May 2011.
FUNDACIÓN CYD (Conocimiento Y Desarrollo) (2009). Informe de la Fundación Conocimiento y Desarrollo 2009. http://tinyurl.com/6hg63o9 - Accessed 2 May 2011.
GECA CONSULTORES (2011). Informe sobre el consumo de la Televisión. http://tinyurl.com/6s6llpn - Accessed 2 May 2011.
GRÖNROOS, C. (1994). From marketing mix to relationship marketing: Towards a paradigm shift in marketing. Management Decisions, 32(2): 4-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251749410054774
HELGESEN, O. (2008). Marketing for higher education: A relationship marketing approach. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 18(1): 50-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08841240802100188
HOLSWORTH, D.W.; NIND, D. (2005). Choice modelling New Zealand high school seniors' preferences for university education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 15(2): 81-104.
INFORME ANUAL DE LA PROFESIÓN PERIODÍSTICA (2010). Ed. Asociación de la Prensa de Madrid.
KEEN, C.; WARNER, D. (1989). Visual & Corporate Identity: A Study of Identity Programmemes in the College. Polytechnic and University Environment, Heist Publications.
KOTLER, P.; FOX, K.A. (1995). Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions (2nd Eds.). Prentice Hall.
LANDRUM, R.E.; TURRISI, R.; HARLESS, C (1998). University image: the benefits of assessment and modelling. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 9(1): 53-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J050v09n01_05
LUQUE, T.; DEL BARRIO, S. (2007). Análisis del valor de las percepciones de los clientes en el diagnóstico estratégico de la universidad. International Congress of Marketing Trends, 26-27 January 2007.
Intangible Capital - http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.277
- 59 -
LUST, P. (1998). Students as Customers: Would you like fries with your Shakespeare?. Osborn, R.E.E. (Eds.), Scholarship, Service, and Integrity: Benchmarks in a Changing Landscape, ACHE Proceedings, Pennsylvania, 54.
MARINGE, F. (2006). University & Course Choice: Implications for positioning, recruitment and marketing. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(6): 466-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513540610683711
MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN (2010). Estrategia Universidad 2015. Servicio De publicaciones del Ministerio de Educación. http://tinyurl.com/6kmcdau
OFICINA DE COOPERACIÓN UNIVERSITARIA (OCU) (2010). 2020 Tendencias Universidad: estudio de prospectiva. http://tinyurl.com/3zy48tz - Accessed 20 May 2011.
PITMAN, T. (2000). Perceptions of academics and students as customers: A survey of administrative staff in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(2): 165-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713678138
SEYMOUR, D.; COLLETT, C. (1991). Total Quality Management in Higher Education: A Critical Assessment. GOAL/QPC, Methuen, MA.
SHUPE, D.A. (1999). Productivity, quality, and accountability in higher education. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 47(1): 2-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07377366.1999.10400360
SOUTAR, G.N.; TURNER, J.P. (2002). Students’ preferences for university: A conjoint analysis. International Journal of Educational Management, 16(1): 40-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513540210415523
TIERNEY, W.G. (1999). Building the Responsive Campus: Creating High Performance Colleges and Universities. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
TRULLAS, I.; ENACHE, M. (2011). Anàlisi teòrica dels antecedents i conseqüències de la identificació de l'alumnat amb la universitat i de la seva percepció de qualitat universitària. Intangible Capital, 7(1): 170-212. http://tinyurl.com/69sfeub Accessed 30 April 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.2011.v7n1.p170-212
VELOUTSOU, C.; LEWIS, J.W.; PATON, R.A. (2004). University selection: Information requirements and importance. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(3): 160-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513540410527158
Intangible Capital - http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.277
- 60 -
Due to the length of the questionnaire, this was not included in the article. For to consult, please contact directly with the author.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com