You are here

Home » Content

Diseño organizativo y knowledge performance: Un estudio empírico

Organizational design and knowledge performance. An empirical study

Journal Name:

  • Intangible Capital

Publication Year:

  • 2008
DOI: 
doi: 10.3926/ic.2008.v4n3.p166-190

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The paper analyzes how the traditional variables that define a firm’s organizational structure (formalization, complexity, and centralization) influence knowledge performance (the degree to which a firm generates knowledge and uses it to reach a competitive advantage). Three hypotheses are tested using a sample of 164 large Spanish firms. The results show that organizational complexity and centralization exert a positive and a negative influence, respectively, on knowledge performance, which confirms the two hypotheses related to these variables. However, the analysis reveals no empirical evidence to confirm the hypothesis that formalization and knowledge performance are related positively.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
El propósito de este trabajo es analizar cómo las variables tradicionales de la estructura organizativa (formalización, complejidad y centralización) influyen en el knowledge performance, entendido éste como el grado en que una empresa genera nuevo conocimiento y lo utiliza para alcanzar una ventaja competitiva. Tras revisar la literatura, se formulan tres hipótesis que son contrastadas en una muestra de 164 grandes empresas españolas. Los resultados muestran que la complejidad y la centralización se asocian de forma positiva y negativa, respectivamente, con el knowledge performance, confirmando las dos hipótesis relacionadas con estas variables. Sin embargo, no se ha encontrado evidencia empírica que confirme la hipótesis que vinculaba positivamente la formalización y el knowledge performance.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_141134_4_pp_166-190.pdf
  • 3
166-190
  • Spanish

REFERENCES

References: 

ADLER, P.S.; BORYS, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1):61-89.
AHN, J-H.; LEE, D-J.; LEE, S-Y. (2006). Balancing business performance and
knowledge performance of new product development. Long Range Planning,
39(5):525-542.
AIKEN, M.; BACHARACH, S.; FRENCH, J.L. (1980). Organizacional structure, work
process, and proposal making in administrative bureaucracies. Academy of
Management Journal, 23(4):631-652.
AMASON, A.C.; THOMPSON, K.T.; HOCHWARTER, W.A.; HARRISON, A.W. (1995).
Conflict: an important dimension in successful management teams. Organizational
Dynamics, 24(2):20-34.
ARMSTRONG, J. S.; OVERTON, T.S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail
surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3):396-402.
BASKERVILLE, R.; DULIPOVICI, A. (2006). The theoretical foundations of
knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4:83-105.
BECERRA-FERNÁNDEZ, I.; SABHERWAL, R. (2001). Organizational knowledge
management: a contingency perspective. Journal of Management Information
Systems, 18(1):23-55.
BECKER, M.; LAZARIC, N.; NELSON, R.; WINTER, S. (2005). Applying
organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Industrial and
Corporate Change, 14(5):775-791.
BIERLY, P.; CHAKRABARTI, A. (1996). Generic knowledge strategies in the USA.
Pharmaceutical Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(winter special
issue):123-135.
BONTIS, N.; CHUA, W.; RICHARDSON, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business
performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1):85-100.
©© Intangible Capital, 2008 – 4(3): 166-190 – ISSN: 1697-9818
doi: 10.3926/ic.2008.v4n3.p166-190
Diseño organizativo y knowledge performance: Un estudio empírico 187
E. Claver-Cortés – E. M. Pertusa-Ortega – P. C. Zaragoza-Sáez
CLAVER-CORTÉS, E.; ZARAGOZA-SAEZ, P.; PERTUSA-ORTEGA, E. (2007).
Organizational structure features supporting knowledge management processes.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4):45-57.
COHEN, W.; LEVINTHAL, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on
learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1):128-152.
CORDÓN-POZO, E.; GARCÍA-MORALES, V.J.; ARAGÓN-CORREA, J.A. (2006). Interdepartmental
collaboration and new product development success: a study on the
collaboration between marketing and R&D in Spanish high-technology firms.
International Journal of Technology Management, 35(1/2/3/4):52-79.
CROSSAN, M.M.; LANE, H.W.; WHITE, R.E. (1999). An organizational learning
framework: from intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review,
24(3):522-537.
DAMANPOUR, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of
determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3):555-590.
DAMANPOUR, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and
testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5):693-716.
DAMANPOUR, F.; SCHNEIDER, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in
organizations: effects of environment, organization and top managers. British
Journal of Management, 17:215-236.
DEWAR, R.; HAGE, J. (1978). Size, technology, complexity and structural
differentiation: toward a conceptual synthesis. Administrative Science Quarterly,
23(1):111-136.
DILLMAN, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys. The Tailored Design Method
(2nd ed.) New York: John Wiley.
DRUCKER, P. F. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business
Review, 66 (1):45-53.
FELDMAN, M.; PENTLAND, B. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a
source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1):94-118.
©© Intangible Capital, 2008 – 4(3): 166-190 – ISSN: 1697-9818
doi: 10.3926/ic.2008.v4n3.p166-190
Diseño organizativo y knowledge performance: Un estudio empírico 188
E. Claver-Cortés – E. M. Pertusa-Ortega – P. C. Zaragoza-Sáez
FREDRICKSON, J.W. (1986). The strategic decision process and organizational
structure. Academy of Management Review, 11(2):280-297.
GOLD, A.; MALHOTRA, A.; SEGARS, A. (2001). Knowledge management: an
organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information
Systems, 18(1):185-214.
GOVINDARAJAN, V. (1988). A contingency approach to strategy implementation at
the business-unit level: integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy.
Academy of Management Journal, 31 (4):828-853.
GRAHAM, A.B.; PIZZO, V.G. (1996). A question of balance: case studies in strategic
knowledge management. European Management Journal, 14(4):338-346.
HANDY, C. (1992). Balancing corporate power: a new federalist paper. Harvard
Business Review, 70(6):59-72.
HEDLUND, G. (1994). A model of knowledge management and the N-form
corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15:73-90.
KOGUT, B.; ZANDER, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and
learning. Organization Science, 7:502-518.
LAM, A. (2000). Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions:
an integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21(3):487-513.
LEE, H.; CHOI, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and
organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination.
Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1):179-228.
LEE, J.; MILLER, D. (1996). Strategy, environment and performance in two
technological contexts: contingency theory in Korea. Organization Studies,
17(5):729-750.
LIAO, Y.S. (2007). The effects of knowledge management strategy and organization
structure on innovation. International Journal of Management, 24(1):53-60.
©© Intangible Capital, 2008 – 4(3): 166-190 – ISSN: 1697-9818
doi: 10.3926/ic.2008.v4n3.p166-190
Diseño organizativo y knowledge performance: Un estudio empírico 189
E. Claver-Cortés – E. M. Pertusa-Ortega – P. C. Zaragoza-Sáez
MANDEVILLE, T. (2005). Collaboration and the network form of organization in the
new knowledge-based economy, in ROONEY, D., HEARN, G., NINAN, A. (eds)
Handbook on the knowledge economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
MASON C.; PERREAULT, W.D. Jr. (1991). Collinearity, power, and interpretation of
multiple regression analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3):268-280.
MILLER, D.; DRÖGE, C. (1986). Psychological and traditional determinants of
structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4):539-560.
MINTZBERG, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: a synthesis of the
research. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
MORENO-LUZÓN, M.D.; LLORIA, M.B. (2007). The role of non-structural and
informal mechanisms of integration and coordination as forces in knowledge
creation. British Journal of Management, (doi:10.1111/j.1467-
8551.2007.00544.x).
NAHAPIET, J.; GHOSHAL, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the
organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2):242-267.
NONAKA, I. (1988). Toward middle-up-down management: accelerating
information creation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 29(3):9-18.
NONAKA, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review,
69(6):96-104.
NONAKA, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation.
Organization Science, 5(1):14-37.
NONAKA, I.; KONNO, N. (1998). The concept of ‘Ba’: building a foundation for
knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3):40-54.
NONAKA, I.; TAKEUCHI, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York:
Oxford University Press.
PODSAKOFF, P.M.; MACKENZIE, S.B.; LEE, J.Y. (2003). Common method biases in
behavioural research: a critical review of the literature and recommended
remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5):879-903.
©© Intangible Capital, 2008 – 4(3): 166-190 – ISSN: 1697-9818
doi: 10.3926/ic.2008.v4n3.p166-190
Diseño organizativo y knowledge performance: Un estudio empírico 190
E. Claver-Cortés – E. M. Pertusa-Ortega – P. C. Zaragoza-Sáez
POPADIUK, S.; CHOO, C.W. (2006). Innovation and knowledge creation: how are
these concepts related? International Journal of Information Management,
26:302-312.
POWER, J.; WADDELL, D. (2004). The link between self-managed work teams and
learning organisations using performance indicators. The Learning Organization,
11(2/3):244-259.
PUGH, D.S.; HICKSON, D.J.; HININGS, C.R.; TURNER C. (1968). Dimensions of
organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1):65-105.
ROBBINS, S.P. (1990). Organization theory: structure, design, and applications
(3rd ed.) New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
SALLAN, J.M. (2006). Caracterización de los grupos informales de transmisión de
conocimiento mediante el análisis de redes sociales. Intangible Capital, 2(11): 21-
36.
SÁNCHEZ, M.; SARABIA, F.J. (1999). Validez y fiabilidad de escalas, en Sarabia,
F.J. (coord.), Metodología para la investigación en marketing y dirección de
empresas. Pirámide: 363-393.
VAN DEN BOSCH, F.; VOLBERDA, H.W.; DE BOER, M. (1999). Coevolution of firm
absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: organizational forms and
combinative capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5):551-568.
WANG, C.L.; AHMED, P.K. (2003). Structure and structural dimensions for
knowledge-based organizations. Measuring Business Excellence, 7(1):51-62.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com