You are here

Evidence of mispricing for South African listed R&D firms contributed by accounting conservatism

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.880
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of capitalization of research and development on the valuation of equities for listed firms in South Africa. Design/methodology: 15 years of financial data (2000 to 2014) was collected, and portfolios with similar price-to-book and market size ratios were formed to find any evidence of any postinvestment excess returns and the association to the level of research and development investment. Portfolios were re-formed and annually ranked by their research and development intensity relative to sales. In addition, we looked at the changes in excess returns after adjusting the book value as a result of capitalizing R&D expenditure, to see if the distortion imposed by expensing R&D contributed to the under-valuation of firms that invest in R&D. Findings: The results indicate that firms that invest in research and development are systematically under-valued. We found no evidence of any positive association between the post-investment excess returns and investment levels, but rather found evidence of the glamour stock phenomenon in highly intensive research and development firms. Research limitations/implications: The sample data is limited to listed firms in South Africa, and for firms with intermittently omitted R&D on their financial report, we have assumed that such expenditure is zero for the non-disclosed period for the purpose of capitalization and amortisation. Listed firms whose main focus is on building intangible assets, are relatively few, hence our research is descriptive in nature. Practical implications: This paper highlights the commercial significance of valuing the longterm benefits of research and development. Capitalizing the development phase as afforded by the IASB lacks standardization, and as such, inconsistencies arise in the earnings reflected on companies’ financial statements. For investors though, highly intensive R&D firms should be avoided as these earn negative returns. Originality/value: The authors are not aware of any studies showing the effect of accounting rules on research and development that have been conducted in South Africa, or any research that have shown the glamour stock phenomena when investigating the impact of capitalization of research and development. Thus our contribution was to provide evidence on the valuation of stocks for listed firms that report research and development in South Africa that may be a result of the accounting rules. There is limited research on the accounting treatment of research and development in emerging markets, whose stock exchanges have been shown to not be highly correlated with the more developed markets, hence enables investors to diversify risk. This should motivate both managers and investors to venture beyond what the conservative accounting treatment of R&D has possibly instigated when valuing stocks.
411
429

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Aboody, D., & Lev, B. (1998). The value relevance of intangibles: The case of software capitalization.
Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 161-191. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491312
Adam, M., & Tweneboah, A. (2009). Foreign Direct Investment and Stock Market Development:
Ghana's Evidence. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 26, 178-185.
Alagidede, P. (2011), Return behaviour in Africa's emerging equity markets. The Quarterly Review of
Economics and Finance, 51(2), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2011.01.004
Anagnostopoulou, S.C. (2008). R&D expenses and firm valuation: A literature review. International
Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 16(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/18347640810887735
Ballester, M., Garcia-Ayuso, M., & Livnat, J. (2003). The economic value of the R&D intangible asset.
European Accounting Review, 12(4), 605-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180310001628437
Barth, M.E., Beaver, W.H., & Landsman, W.R. (2001). The relevance of the value relevance literature
for financial accounting standard setting: another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1),
77-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2
Barth, M.E., Kasznik, R., & McNichols, M.F. (2001). Analyst coverage and intangible assets. Journal of
Accounting Research, 39(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00001
Bhana, N. (2013). The valuation of research and development expenditures: The case for companies
listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. International Journal of Finance and Policy Analysis, 5(2),
3-5.
Bushee, B.J. (1998). The influence of on institutional R&D behavior investors myopic investment. The
Accounting Review, 73(3), 305-333.
Chambers, D. (2011). Discussion of “Is research and development mispriced or properly risk
adjusted?”. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 26(1), 117-120.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X11400582
Chambers, D., Jennings, R., & Thompson II, R.B. (2002). Excess returns to R&D-intensive firms.
Review of Accounting Studies, 7(2-3), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020217817156
Chan, A.L.C. (2012). Innovation activity and corporate financing: Evidence from a developing
economy. Applied Financial Economics, 22(20), 1665-1678. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2012.667547
Chan, L.K.C., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The stock market valuation of research and
development expenditures. Journal of Finance, 56(6), 2431-2456. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00411Chen, M.C., Cheng, S.J., & Hwang, Y. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between
intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital,
6(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930510592771
Ciftci, M., Lev, B., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2009). Is research and development mispriced or properly risk
adjusted?. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 26(1), 81-116.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X11400581
Cormier, D., Houle, S., & Ledoux, M.J. (2013). The incidence of earnings management on information
asymmetry in an uncertain environment: Some Canadian evidence. Journal of International Accounting,
Auditing and Taxation, 22(1), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2013.02.002
Damodaran, A. (1999). Research and development expenses: Implications for profitability measurement and valuation.
Working Paper No. FIN-99-024, Stern School of Business, New York University.
Dinh, T., Eierle, B., Schultze, W., & Steeger, L. (2015). Research and development, uncertainty, and
analysts’ forecasts: The case of IAS 38. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting ,
26(3), 257-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12029
Eberhart, A.C., Maxwell, W.F., & Siddique, A.R. (2004). An examination of long-term abnormal stock
returns and operating performance following R&D increases. Journal of Finance, 59, 623-650.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00644.x
Ezell, S.J., Nager, A.B., & Atkinson, R.D. (2016). Contributors and Detractors: Ranking Countries' Impact on
Global Innovation. Retrieved from: http://www2.itif.org/2016-contributors-and-detractors.pdf?
_ga=1.257774862.421061582.1464445548
Faff, R., Ho, Y.K., Lin, W., & Yap, C.M. (2013). Diminishing marginal returns from R&D investment:
Evidence from manufacturing firms. Applied Economics, 45(5), 611-622.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.608644
Fama, E.F., & French, K.R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal
and Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
Firer, S., & Williams, S.M. (2003). Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate
performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(3), 348-360. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930310487806
García-Meca, E., & Martínez, I. (2007). The use of intellectual capital information in investment
decisions: An empirical study using analyst reports. The International Journal of Accounting, 42(1), 57-81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2006.12.003 Gong, J.J., & Wang, S.I. (2016). Changes in the value relevance of research and development expenses
after IFRS adoption. Advances in Accounting. Advance online publication.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.05.002
Habtay, S.R. (2012). A firm-Level analysis on the relative difference between technology-driven and
market-driven disruptive business model innovations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(3),
290-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00628.x
Kimouche, B., & Rouabhi, A. (2016). The impact of intangibles on the value relevance of accounting
information: Evidence from French companies. Intangible Capital, 12(2), 506-529.
https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.653
Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2010). Valuation: Measuring and managing the value of companies
(5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley
Kothari, S.P., Laguerre, T.E., & Leone, A.J. (2002). Capitalization versus expensing: Evidence on the
uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures versus R&D outlays. Review of Accounting
Studies, 7(4), 355-382. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020764227390
Lev, B. (1999). The inadequate public information on intellectual capital and its consequences. Conference
presentation at the International Symposium, Measuring and Reporting Intellectual Capital: Experiences, Issues, and
Prospects, Amsterdam, Holanda, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 9-10
June.
Lev, B. (2003). Remarks on the measurement, valuation, and reporting of intangible assets. Economic
Policy Review, 9(3), 17-22.
Lev, B., Sarath, B., & Sougiannis, T. (2005). R&D reporting biases and their consequences. Contemporary
Accounting Research, 22(4), 977-1026. https://doi.org/10.1506/7XMH-QQ74-L6GG-CJRX
Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal
of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(95)00410-6
Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1999). Penetrating the book-to-market black box: The R&D effect. Journal of
Business Finance & Accounting, 26(3-4), 419-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00262
Li, W.C.Y. (2012). Depreciation of business R&D capital. Bureau of Economic Analysis/National Science
Foundation R&D Satellite Account Paper, Washington D. C.
Palmon, D., & Yezegel, A. (2012). R&D intensity and the value of analysts’ recommendations.
Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(2), 621-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01117.x Pandit, S., Wasley, C.E., & Zach, T. (2011). The effect of research and development (R&D) inputs and
outputs on the relation between the uncertainty of future operating performance and R&D
expenditures. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 26(1), 121-144.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X11400583
Park, C.K., Chung, S.G., & Kim, J.W. (2014). Accounting for R&D expenditure: To capitalize or not to
capitalize. Life Science Journal, 11(7), 107-111.
Penman, S.H., & Zhang, X.J. (2012). Accounting the quality stock of conservatism, earnings, returns
and stock returns. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 237-264. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.237
Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review,
68(3), 79-91.
Rubera, G., & Kirca, A.H. (2012). Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta-analytic
review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 130-147.
https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0494
Sorescu, A.B., Chandy, R.K., & Prabhu, J.C. (2003). Sources and financial consequences of radical
innovation: Insights from pharmaceuticals. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 82-102.
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.4.82.18687
Wang, Y., Du, R., Koong, K.S., & Fan, W. (2016). Effects of R&D policy choice on accounting
performance and market value. R&D Management. Advance online publication.
https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12225
Watts, R.L., & Zimmerman, J.L. (1990). Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. Accounting
Review, 65(1), 131-156.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com