You are here

Home » Content

Genç Futbolcularda Çeviklik ile Vücut Kompozisyonu ve Anaerobik Güç Arasındaki İlişki

Relationship between Agility and Body Composition, Anaerobic Power in Young Soccer Players

Journal Name:

  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between agility and body composition, anaerobic power in young soccer players. Twenty three young soccer players (age: 15.830.56 years; stature: 172.46.4 cm; body weight: 62.25.5 kg) volunteered to participate in the study. Anthropometric measurements (stature, body weight, body fat ratio), agility (Ilinois and 505 tests), Wingate Anaerobic Power (WanT), and 30 seconds multiple jump tests were aplied to soccer players. The relationship between anthropometric variables and agility, and 505 and WanT tests were nonsignificant (p>0.05). On the other hand Illinois agility and WanT, where instantenous peak absolute power (PAP) was measured, anaerobic power (AP), and anaerobic capacity (AC) showed significant (p<0.05) correlation (r= -0.682, r= -0.525, and r= -0.545 respectively). Except for PAP, the correlation between relative AP, AC, and Illinois test scores were high (p<0.05) (r = -0.533, r = -0.628, r = -0.709 respectively). 30 second multiple jump power values and both of the agility tests showed insignificant correlation (p>0.05). As a result of this study it can be concluded that the anthropometric variables have no determining influence on Illinois agility test. However, while Illinois agility test and WanT anaerobic power test have significant relationship, 505 test was independent from both anthropometric and power test variables.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı genç futbolcularda çeviklik ile vücut kompozisyonu ve anaerobik güç arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektir. Çalışmaya 23 genç futbolcu (yaş: 15.830.56 yıl; boy: 172.46.4 cm; vücut ağırlığı: 62.25.5 kg) gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Futbolculara antropometrik ölçümler (boy, vücut ağırlığı, vücut yağ yüzdesi), çeviklik (Illinois ve 505 testi), Wingate anaerobik güç (WanT) ve 30 sn çoklu sıçrama testleri uygulanmıştır. Antropometrik değişkenler ve çeviklik arasındaki ilişkiler anlamsız bulunmuştur (p>0.05). 505 çeviklik testi ve WanT’de ölçülen güç değişkenleri arasında ilişkiler anlamsız (p>0.05), buna karşılık Illinois çeviklik testi ve WanT’de ölçülen absolut anlık zirve güç (AZG) (r = -0.682), anaerobik güç(ANG) (r = -0.525) ve anaerobik kapasite (ANK) (r = -0.545) arasındaki ilişkiler anlamlıdır (p<0.05). Relatif AZG hariç, relatif ANG ve ANK ve Illinois test skorları arasındaki ilişkiler daha yüksektir (p<0.05) (sırasıyla r = -0.533, r = -0.628, r = -0.709). 30 sn çoklu sıçrama testinde ölçülen güç değerleri ve her iki çeviklik testi arasındaki ilişkiler anlamsız bulunmuştur (p>0.05). Bu çalışmanın bulguları Illinois çeviklik testinde antropometrik değişkenlerin belirleyici olmadığını, ancak WanT anaerobik güç değerleriyle yakın ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Buna karşılık 505 çeviklik testi, hem antropometrik hem de güç değişkenlerinden bağımsızdır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_152775_21_pp_146-153.pdf
  • 4
146-153
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Alves JMVM, Rebelo AN, Abrantes C, Sampaio J.
(2010). Shortterm effects of complex and contrast
training in soccer players’ vertical jump, sprint, and
agility abilities. Journal of Strength & Conditioning
Research, 24(4), 936–941.
2. Bangsbo J. (1992). Time and motion characteristics of
competition soccer. Science & Football, 6(2), 34–40.
3. Chaouachi A, Brughelli M, Chamari K, Levin GT, Ben
Abdelkrim N, Laurencelle L, ve diğ. (2009). Lower limb
maximal dynamic strength and agility determinants
in elite basketball players. Journal of Strength &
Conditioning Research, 23(5), 1570–1577.
4. Delecluse C. (1997). Influence of strength training
on sprint running performance. Current findings and
implications for training. Sports Medicine, 24(3),147-56.
5. Delecluse C, Van Coppenolle H, Willems E, Van
Leemputte M, Diels R, Goris M. (1995). Influence of
high-resistance and high-velocity training on sprint
performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and
Exercise, 27(8), 1203-1209.
6. Draper JA, Lancaster MG. (1985). The 505 test: A test
for agility in the horizontal plane. Australian Journal for
Science and Medicine in Sport, 17(1), 15 – 18.
7. Ellis L, Gastin P, Lawrence S, Savage B, Buckeridge A,
Stapff A, ve diğ. (2000). Protocols for the physiological
assessment of team sports players. Physiological Tests
for Elite Athletes. CJ. Gore, der. Champaign: Human
Kinetics. pp. 128–144.
8. Gabbett TJ. (2002). Physiological characteristics of
junior and senior rugby league players. Brithish Journal
of Sports Medicine, 36, 334–339.
9. Gil S, Ruiz F, Irazusta A, Gil J, Irazusta J. (2007).
Selection of young soccer players in terms of
anthropometric and physiological factors. Journal of
Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 47(1), 25-32.
10. Jarvis S, Sullivan LO, Davies B, Wiltshire H, Baker
JS. (2009). Interrelationships Between Measured
Running Intensities and Agility Performance in Subelite
Rugby Union Players. Research in Sports Medicine, 17,
217–230.
11. Khorasani MA, Sahebozamani M, Tabrizi KG, Yusof
AB. (2010). Acute effect of different stretching methods
on Illinois agility test in soccer players. Journal of
Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(10), 2698-2704.
12. Little T, Williams AG. (2005). Specificity of acceleration,
maximum speed, and agility in professional soccer
players. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research,
19, 76–78.
13. Little T, Williams AG. (2006). Effects of differential
stretching protocols during warm-ups on high-speed
motor capacities in professional soccer players. Journal
of Strength & Conditioning Research, 20(1), 203–207.
14. Reilly T, Bangsbo J, Franks A. (2000). Anthropometric
and physiological predispositions for elite soccer.
Journal of Sports Sciences, 18, 669–683.
15. Shephard RJ. (1999). Biology and medicine of soccer,
an update. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17, 757-786.
16. Sheppard JM. Young WB. (2006). Agility literature
review: Classifications, training and testing. Journal of
Sports Sciences, 24(9), 919 – 932.
17. Thomas K, French D, Hayes PR. (2009). The effect of
two plyometric training techniques on muscular power
and agility in youth soccer players. Journal of Sports
Sciences, 23(1), 332–335.
18. Twist PW, Benicky D. (1995). Conditioning lateral
movements for multisport athletes. Practical strength
and quickness drills. Strength & Conditioning, 17, 43–51.
19. Vescovi JD, Mcguigan MR. (2008). Relationships
between sprinting, agility, and jump ability in female
athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(1), 97 – 107.
20. Wisløff U, Castagna C, Helgerud J, Jones R, Hoff, J.
(2004). Maximal squat strength is strongly correlated
to sprint-performance and vertical jump height in elite
soccer players. Brithish Journal of Sports Medicine, 38,
285–288.
21. Young WB, McDowell MH, Scarlett BJ. (2001).
Specificity of sprint and agility training methods
Journal of Sports Sciences, 15(3), 315-319.
22. Young WB, James R, Montgomery I. (2002). Is
muscle power related to running speed with changed
of direction? Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical
Fitness, (42), 282-288.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com