You are here

Home » Content

Değişimin ve Dönüşümün Aracı Olarak Girişimci Üniversite

Journal Name:

  • Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Universities have undergone various changes due to new paradigms in the world. Developed countries found entrepreneurship as one of the solutions for this adaptation process. Turkey, effected by global, national and institutional factors, many find entrepreneurial university as an instrumental tool. Entrepreneurship has gained different aspects since Schumpeter’s explanation. Leaving aside the profit making side entrepreneurship, may be a new breath for universities with its risk taking creative an innovative aspects for the universities of knowledge society. Turkey, thus, may benefit from different types of entrepreneurship by transforming its universities to a model of productive, innovative and quality assured institutions.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Üniversiteler, çok degiskenli bir yapının etkisinde yeni çaga uyum saglamaya çalısıyor. Gelismis ülkeler bu uyumu saglamak için, “girisimci üniversite” uygulamasına yönelmis bulunuyor. Küresel, ulusal ve kurumsal etkilerin tüm baskılarını hisseden ülkemiz üniversiteleri için de, “girisimci üniversite” modeli degisim ve dönüsüm için bir araç olabilir. Girisimcilik kavramı, Schumpeter’ın açıklamalarından bu yana büyük gelismeler ve yeni özellikler kazanmıstır. Kar amacının geri planda kalıp, risk alma, yaratıcı ve yenilikçi olma özellikleri günümüzün bilgi toplumlarındaki üniversite modelinin özünü de olusturmaktadır. Kamu, devlet, kurumsal, sosyal ve iç girisimci özelliklerinden ülkemiz uygun bir model çıkartabilmelidir. Böylece; verimli, yenilikçi, yaratıcı, saydam ve kalite odaklı üniversitelere dönüsebilmek, uluslararası rekabette hak edilen yere gelebilmek olanaklıdır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-degisimin-donusumun-araci-olarak-girisimci-universite.pdf
  • 1
87-104
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

ANDERSECK, Klaus; (2004), “Institutional and Academic Entrepreneurship:
Implications for University Governance and Management”, Higher Education in Europe,
Vol:29, S:2, s.194.
BASAR, Mehmet, TOSUNOGLU, Tugberk ve DEM.RC., E.; (2001), Girisimcilik
ve Girisimcinin Yol Haritası: s Planı, Eskisehir, Eskisehir Ticaret Odası Yayın No:14.
BENZ, Matthias; (2005), “Entrepreneurship as a Non-profit-seeking, Activity”,
httt://www.iew.unizh. ch/wp/ Mayıs 2005.
BOYETT, Inger; (1996), “The Public Sector Entrepreneur-a definition”,
International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol: 9, No:2, s.49.
CLARK, Burton R.; (1998), Creating Entrepreneurial University: Organizational
Pathways of Transformation, Oxford, IAU Press -Pergamon.
ETZKOWITZ, Henry; (2003), “Research Groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The Invention of
the Entrepreneurial University”, Research Policy, S.:32, s.115.
ETZKOWITZ, Henry, Andrew WEBSTER, Christiane GEBHARDT ve Branca
Regina Cantisano TERRA; (2000), “The Future of the University and the University of the
Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm”, Research Policy, S:29, s.314.
GÜRÜZ, Kemal; (2001), Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Yüksekögretim: Tarihçe ve
Bugünkü Sevk ve dare Sistemleri, Ankara, ÖSYM Yayın No: 2001/4.
GÜMRÜKÇÜ, Harun; (2005), “Bologna-Prag-Berlin Süreçleri Isıgı Altında
Türkiye’de Yüksek Ögretim Politikası ve Yüksek Ögretimde Degisim”, Küresellesme, Türkiye
ve Avrupa Yüksekögretim Alanı, (Ed.:Harun Gümrükçü), Hamburg, Avrupa Türkiye
Arastırmaları Enstitüsü Yayını.
KRISTENSEN, Bente; (1999), “The Entrepreneurial University as a Learning
University”, Higher Education in Europe, Vol: 24, S: 1, s.45.
LAZZERONI, Michela ve PICCALUGA, Andrea; (2003), “Towards the
Entrepreneurial University 1”, Local Economy, Vol: 18, S: 1, s.38
McDANIEL, Bruce A.; (2005), “A Contemporary View of Joseph A.Schumbeter’s
Theory of the Entrepreneur”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol: 39, S:2, s. 488.
MÉSZÁROS, Rezsö; (1999), “Vital Resources for Global Competition: Quality,
Adaptability, and the Regional Role”, Higher Education in Europa, Vol:24,S:1, s.91.
ODABASI, Ferhan ve ODABASI, Yavuz; (2004), “Girisimci Üniversitelere Dogru”,
Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik Dergisi, 18 Eylül 2004, S: 913, s.20
PARELLADA, Francesc Sole ve Josep Coll BERTRAN; (1999), “The Responses of
Higher Education Institutions to Global Challenge: Innovative Universities and Human
Resources Development”, Higher Education in Europe, Vol: 24, S: 1, s.74
RÖPKE, Jacher, “The Entrepreneurial University: Innovation, academic knowledge
creation and regional development in a globalized economy”, http:/www.wiwi.unimarburg.de/
lehrstuehle/vwl/WITH03/main. html. Haziran 2005.
SAARES, Virgilia, MEIRA, A. ve Alberta M.S.C. AMARAL; (1999), “The
Entrepreneurial University: a Fine Answer to a Difficult Problem?”, Higher Education in
Europe, Vol:24, S:1, s.13.
SCHULTE, Peter; (2004), “The Entrepreneurial University: A Strategy for
Institutional Development”, Higher Education in Europe, Vol: 29, S: 2, s.188.
THOMPSON John L.; (2002), “The World of the Social Entrepreneur”, The
International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol: 15, S: 4/5, s.413.
TÜS.AD; (2003), Yüksekögretimin Yeniden Yapılandırılması: Temel lkeler,
.stanbul: TÜS.AD Yayın No:10/365.
TÜS.AD; (2002), Türkiye’de Girisimcilik, .stanbul, TÜS.AD Yayın No:12/340.
YU Tony Fu-Lai; (2001), “Towards a Theory of the Entrepreneurial State”,
International Journal of Social Economics, Vol.:28, S: 9, s.754.
WOUWEN, Kees; (2000), “Strategy, Structure and Culture of the Hybrid University:
Towards the University of the 21.st Century”, Tertiary Education and Management, Vol:6,
S:1, s.54.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com