You are here

Home » Content

Farklı Damlatıcı Aralıklarının ve Sulama Düzeylerinin Salçalık Domatesin Verim ve Kalite Bileşenleri Üzerine Etkisi

Effects of Different Emitter Spaces and Irrigation Levels on Yield and Yield Components of Processing Tomato

Journal Name:

  • Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study was carried out in order to determine the effects of different emitter spaces and water stress on total fruits yield (TFY); yield suitable for processing (PFY) and paste output (PO) of processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Shasta) and some quality characteristics (mean fruit weight-MFW, fruit diameter-FD, penetration value of fruit-PV, pH, total soluble solids-TSS and ascorbic acid-AA contents) under ecological conditions of Konya Plain in 2004 and 2005 years. The randomized split block experimental design with three replications was applied in the study. Drip irrigation laterals were arranged in such a way that every row had one lateral. Emitter spacing of 25, 50 and 75 cm (A, B and C respectively) were the main treatments while four levels of water supply irrigation at 7 days intervals with water amount enough to fill the soil depth of 0-60 cm till field capacity (I1), and 25, 50 and 75% decreased water supply levels (I2, I3 and I4) were applied as sub treatments of the experiment. According to results of the main treatments for two years showed that the highest total fruits yield (51.75-52.43 t ha-1), as well as yield suitable for processing (47.23- 49.33 t ha-1) were obtained from A treatment (p<0.01). On the other hand, the highest TFY, PFY and PO of the sub treatments were obtained from I1 application. MFW, FD and TSS were significantly affected from the sub treatments (p<0.05). High stress resulted in the highest soluble solids. Total irrigation water amount and water consumptive use of the treatment A were determined as 250-376 mm and 414-425 mm, in 2004-2005. Total irrigation water amount and water consumptive use of I1 treatments were 426-587 mm and 520-623 mm for two years, respectively.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma, 2004-2005 (2 yıl) yılları arasında, Konya ekolojik koşullarında salçalık domatesin (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Shasta) toplam meyve verimi (TFY), salçalık meyve verimi (PFY), salça verimi (PO) ve bazı kalite kriterleri (ortalama meyve ağırlığı-MFW, meyve çapı-FD, meyve delinme direnci- PV, pH, toplam suda çözünebilir katı madde-TSS ve askorbik asit içeriği-AA) üzerine farklı damlatıcı aralığı ve su stresinin etkisini araştırmak amacı ile yürütülmüştür. Deneme Tesadüf Bloklarında Bölünmüş Parseller Deneme Deseni’nde ve 3 tekerrürlü olarak kurulmuştur. Lateraller her bitki sırasına bir lateral olacak şekilde yerleştirilmiştir. Denemenin ana konuları 3 farklı damlatıcı aralığı 25 cm, 50 cm ve 75 cm (A,B ve C koşulları) şeklinde oluşturulurken; alt konuları da 4 farklı sulama suyu; I1= (tam sulanan) 0-60 cm’deki eksik nemin 7 günde bir tarla kapasitesine tamamlanması, I2= %25 kısıntı, I3= %50 kısıntı ve I4= %75 olacak şekilde kısıntı konularından oluşturulmuştur. İki yıllık deneme sonuçlarına göre; her iki yılda da ana konuların en iyi toplam meyve verimi (51.8.-52.4 t ha-1) ve salçalık meyve verimi (47.2-49.3 t ha-1) A konusundan elde edilmiştir (p<0.01). Diğer taraftan, alt konularda en yüksek TFY (66.2-66.8 t ha-1), PFY (60.7-63.7 t ha-1) ve PO (11.4-12.4 t ha-1) I1 konusundan elde edilmiştir. MFW, FD ve TSS uygulamalardan etkilenmiştir (p<0.05). Yüksek stress koşullarında suda çözünebilir katı madde içeriği artmıştır. Deneme yıllarında, A konusunun sulama suyu miktarı sırasıyla 250-376 mm ve su tüketim miktarı 414-425 mm olmuştur. Alt konulardan I1 konusunun sulama suyu mikarı ise 426-587 mm iken su tüketimi 520-623 mm’dir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_159097_26_pp_63-70.pdf
  • 2
63-70
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Anonymous, 2008. Agricultural Structure and Production.
Government Statistic Inst. of Prime Minister Pub.
(http://www.tuik.gov.tr).
Balçın, M. and Güleç, H., 1998. Irrigation scheduling of
drip-irrigated tomatoes using class A pan
evaporation in Tokat region (in Turkish). Soil and
Water Sources Research Result Report, Tokat-
Turkey.
Branthome, X.Y., Ple, J., Machado R. and Bieche, B.J.
1994. Influence of drip irrigation on the
technological characteristics of processing tomatoes.
Fifth International Symposium on The Processing
Tomato. 23-27 Nov. 1993, Sorrento, Italy. Acta
Horticulturae, No: 376, 285-290.
Effects of Different Emitter Spaces and Irrigation Levels on Yield and Yield Components of Processing Tomato
70
Candido, V., Miccolis V. and Perniola, M., 2000. Effects
of irrigation regime on yield and quality of
processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)
cultivars. III International Symposium on Irrigation
of Horticultural Crops. Acta Hort., (ISHS) 537:779-
788
Çetin, Ö., Uygan, D., Boyacı, H. and Yıldırım, O., 2002a.
Effects of different irrigation treaments on yield and
quality of drip-irrigated tomatoes under Eskisehir
conditions (in Turkish). IV. Vegetable Agriculture
Symposium. 17-20
September, Bursa-Turkey.
Çetin, Ö., Yıldırım, O., Uygan, D. and Boyacı, H., 2002b.
Irrigation scheduling of drip-irrigated tomatoes
using class A pan evaporation. Turk. J. Agric. For.
26: 171-178.
Hanson B.R., May D.M., and Schwankl L.J., 1997. Drip
irrigation of processing tomatoes. In ‘ASAE Annual
International Meeting’. Minneapolis, Minnesota,
USA, 10–14 August, 1997.
Howell, T.A., Cuenca, R.H. and Solomon, K.H., 1990.
Crop Yield Response. Management of Farm
Irrigation Systems (Ed. Hoffman et al.). ASAE, 311-
312
http://www.actahort.org/books/335/335_16.htm
Howell, T.A., 2006. Challenges in increasing water use
efficiency in irrigated agriculture. In: The
proceedings of International Symposium on Water
and land Management For Sustainable Irrigated
Agriculture, April 4-8, 2006, Adana-Turkey.
Jadhaw, S.S., Gutal, G.B. and Chougule, A.A., 1990. Cost
economies of the drip irrigation system for tomatoes
crop. Department of Agricultural Engineering,
College of Agriculture, Pune, India.
Keller, J. and Bliesner, R.D., 1990. Sprinkle and trickle
irrigation (Chapman and Hall: New York).
May, D.M., 1993. Moisture stress to maximize processing
tomato yield and fruit quality. International
Symposium on Irrigation of Horticultural Crops. 1
April1993.
http://www.actahort.org/books/335/335_67.htm
Mbarek, K.B. and Bouljelben, A., 2004. Behavior of
tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) and red
pepper (Capsicum annum L.) crops under
greenhouse conditions conducted in single and twin
rows. Tropicultura 22 (3), 97-103.
Oweis, T.Y., Shatanawi, M.R. and Ghavi, I.O., 1988.
Optimal irrigation management for protected tomato
in the Jordan Valley. Dirasat: Human and Social
Sciences 15, 104-118.
Özbahçe, A., 2003. The problems of processing tomato
agriculture and the solution proposals. Agriculture
Associations Union in Turkey. Pub.No: 141,
Ankara.
Sanders, D.C., Howell, T.A., Hile, M.M.S., Hodges, L.,
Meek, D. and Phene, C.J., 1989. Yield and quality of
processing tomatoes in response to irrigation rate
and schedule. Journal of the American Society for
Horticultural Science 114, 904–908.
Tan, C.S., 1995. Effect of drip and sprinkler irrigation on
yield and quality of five tomatoes cultivars in
Southeastern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Plant
Science, 1995, 75: 1, 225-230.
Tekinel, O., Kanber, R., Önder, S., Baytorun, N. and
Baştuğ, R., 1989. The effects of trickle and
conventional irrigation meyhods on some crop
yields and water use efficiency under Çukurova
conditions. Irrigation: Theory and practice (edited by
Rydzewski, J.R. and Ward, C.F.J. 1989) 641-651,
Southampton, UK.
Yıldırım, O., 1996. Irrigation Techniques of Horticultural
Crops (in Turkish). Ankara University, Agricultural
Faculty, Publication Number 1438/420, p.188.
Yıldırım, O., 2003. Design of irrigation systems (in
Turkish). Ankara University, Agricultural Faculty,
Publication No: 11536/489, Ankara-Turkey.
Yohannes, F. and Tadesse, T., 1998. Effect of drip and
furrow irrigation and plant spacing on yield of
tomato at Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. Agricultural Water
Management, Volume 35, Issue 3, 201-207.
Yrisarry, B.J.J., Losada, P.M.H. and Podriguez, A.R.,
1993. Response of processing tomato to three
different levels of water and nitrogen applications.
International Symposium on Irrigation of
Horticultural Crops. 1 April 1993.
Yurtsever, N., 1984. Experimental Statistics Methods (in
Turkish). Republic of Turkey, Ministry of
Agriculture The Former General Directorate of
Rural Service, Soil-Fertilizer Research Inst. Pub.
No: 121, Techniques Pub. No: 56, Ankara-Turkey.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com