You are here

Yöresel Peynirden Antimikrobiyal Aktiviteye Sahip Laktik Asit Bakterisinin İzolasyonu ve Tanısı

Identification and Izolation of Lactic Acid Bacterium Having Antimicrobial Activity From Traditionaly Produced Cheese

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, a bacterium having antimicrobial activity was isolated from a traditionally produced cheese, and it was identified and characterized by using general microbiological analysis, carbohydrate fermentation and fatty acid profile identification systems. The isolated bacterium was Gram positive, coccus, non-motile, endospor, catalase, hemolyse, gelatinase, indol and Voges-Proskauer negative and able to grow in the presence of 3.0-6.5 % NaCl, and at pH 4.0 to 9.6 and 10-45oC. Carbohydrate fermantation and fatty acid profile identification systems showed that this bacterium was Enterococcus faecalis. The antimicrobial substance produced by this bacteria had an inhibitory activity against Lactobacillus plantarum, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium and Listeria monocytogenes, but not to Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus. Antimicrobial activity was not due to acidity and hydrogen peroxide. Antimicrobial substance is a proteinaceouse nature since it lost its activity when treated with papain.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalısmada yöresel bir peynirden antimikrobiyal aktiviteye sahip bir bakteri izole edilmis ve genel mikrobiyolojik analizler, karbonhidrat fermantasyon ve yag asidi profili testleri kullanılarak karakterize edilmis ve tanımlanmıstır. İzole edilen bakterinin Gram pozitif, kok seklinde, hareketsiz, endospor, katalaz, hemoliz, jelatinaz, indol ve Voges Proskauer negatif, % 3,0-6,5 NaCl konsantrasyonunda, pH 4,5-9,6 ve 10- 45oC’de gelisebildigi tespit edilmistir. Yapılan karbonhidrat fermantasyonu ile yag asidi profili testleri sonucunda bakterinin Enterococcus faecalis oldugu belirlenmistir. Bu bakteri tarafından üretilen antimikrobiyal maddenin Lactobacillus plantarum, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium ve Listeria monocytogenes’a karsı inhibitör aktiviteye sahip oldugu, ancak Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus ve Bacillus cereus’a karsı etkili olmadıgı gözlenmistir. Antimikrobiyal aktivitenin asitlik ve hidrojen peroksitten kaynaklanmadıgı belirlenmistir. Papainle muamele sonucu aktivitesini kaybetmesi antimikrobiyal bilesigin protein tabiatında oldugunu ortaya koymustur.
1-6

REFERENCES

References: 

Andrighetto, C., Knijff, E., Lombardi, A., Torriani, S.,
Vancanneyt, M., Kersters, K., Swings, J., Dellaglio,
F., 2001. Phenotypic And Genetic Diversity of
Enterococci Isolated From Italian Cheeses. J. Dairy
Res. 68, 303– 316.
Axelsson, L.T., 1993. Lactic Acid Bacteria: Classification
and Physiology. In “ Lactic Acid Bacteria” Salmina,
S., Wright, A.V., pp. 1-63, Marcel Dekker Inc.
USA.
Devlieghere, F., Vermeiren, L., Debevere, J. 2004. New
Preservation Technologies: Possibilities And
Limitations. Inter. Dairy J. 14: 273-285.
Franz, C.M.A.P., Stiles, M. E., Schleifer, K. H., Holzapfel,
W. H. 2003. Enterococci In Foods A Conundrum
For Food Safety. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 88:105–
122.
Foulquie Moreno, M.R., Sarantinopoulos, P., Tsakalidou,
E., De Vuyst, L., 2006. The Role and Application of
Enterococci In Food and Health. Int.J.Food
Microbiol., 106: 1–24.
Giraffa, G. 2002. Enterococci From Foods. FEMS
Microbiol. Rev., 26, 163– 171.
Giraffa, G. 2003. Functionality of Enterococci In Dairy
Products. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 88: 215– 222.
Godfree, A.F., Kay, D., Wyer, M.D., 1997. Faecal
Streptococci As Indicators Of Faecal Contamination
In Water. Soc. Appl. Bacteriol.Sym. Series 26:110-
119.
Koponen, O. 2004. Studies Of Producer Self – Protection
And Nisin Biosynthesis Of Lactococcus lactis,
Doctoral issertation, Institute Of Biotech. And
Department Of Appl. Chem. Microbiol. Helsinki.
Mayr-Harting, A., Hedges, A.J., Berkley, R.W. 1972.
Methods For Studying Bacteriocins. Pp. 315-442. In
‘Methods In Microbiology, J.R. Noris And N.W.
Ribbons (Eds.) Vol 7A.
Mundt, O.J. 1986. Enterococci. In: Sneath, P.H.A., Mair,
N.S., Sharpe, M.E., Holt, J.G. (Eds.), Bergey’s
Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 2. Williams
and Wilkins, Baltimore. pp. 1063– 1065.
Rodriguez, J.M, Martinez, M.I., Horn, N., Dodd, H.M.,
2003. Heterologous Production of Bacteriocins by
Lactic Acid Bacteria. Int. J. Food Micro. 80: 101-
116.
Ogier, J.C., Serror, P. 2008. The Enterococcus genus. Int.
J. Food Microbiol. (in pres).
Sarantinopoulos, P., Andrighetto, C., Georgalaki, M.D.,
Rea, M.C., Lombardi, A., Cogan, T.M.,
Kalantzopoulos, G., Tsakalidou, E. 2001.
Biochemical Properties of Enterococci Relevant to
Their Technological Performance. Int. Dairy J., 11:
621–647.
Schleifer, K.H., Kilpper-Balz, R., 1984. Transfer of
Streptococcus faecalis and Streptococcus faecium to
the genus Enterococcus nom. rev. as Enterococcus
faecalis comb. nov. and Enterococcus faecium
comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 34, 31– 34.
Yöresel Peynirden Antimikrobiyal Aktiviteye Sahip Laktik Asit Bakterisinin zolasyonu ve Tanısı
6
Stiles, M. E., Holzapfel, W. H., 1997. Lactic Acid Bacteria
of Foods and Their Current Taxonomy. Int. J. Food
Microbiol., 36: 1- 29.
Temiz, A. 2000. Genel Mikrobiyoloji Uygulama
Teknikleri. III. Baskı. Hatigoglu Yayınevi. Ankara.
Työppönen, S., Petaja, E., Mattila-Sandholm, T. 2003.
Bioprotectives And Probiotics For Dry Sausages.
Int. J. of Food Microbiol. 83: 233– 244.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com