You are here

Home » Content

KURUMLAR VE EKONOMİK GELİŞME: PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ İLE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Institutions and Development: An Assessment with Panel Data

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2017

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Related to North, we can define institutions as "rules of games" which means they put constraints on individuals’ behaviour. These constraints can be formal as well as informal. Human behaviour being designed by institutions is a well accepted idea more and more each day. Therefore, it follows that institutions determine the winners and losers of society in terms of both economic and social features. This process with its different sides has been investigated by scientists. Several theories have been put forth to understand these relationships. Institutional theories change from macroeconomic approaches, which seek political economy, to microeconomic transaction cost approaches between institutions and development levels. The measurement of instiutions is another area of conflict because of conceptual and therotical debates. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between development and institutions using panel data from 127 countries for the years 2005-2010. The results indicate that country specific qualifications and informal institutions have crucial roles on development
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
North’un kavramsallaştırması ile "oyunun kuralları" olarak tanımlanan kurumlar, bireylerin davranış kalıplarını belirleyen kısıtları koyan birer yapı olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu kısıtlar resmi veya gayri resmi nitelikte olabilmektedir. İnsan davranışları üzerindeki etkisi her geçen gün daha fazla kabul gören kurumlar, iktisadi ve siyasi olarak sistemin işleyişini, sistemin kazanan ve kaybedenlerini de belirleme gücüne sahiptir. Kurumların işleyişi birçok araştırmacı tarafından farklı yönleri ile incelenerek kavramsallaştırılmıştır. Kurumların gelişmişlik düzeyi üzerindeki etkisini ele alan birçok kuram geliştirilmiştir. Bu kuramlar, makroekonomik politik ekonomi yaklaşımlarından mikroekonomik işlem maliyetleri yaklaşımına kadar uzanmaktadır. Literatürde kuramsal çerçevesi tartışılan kurumların ölçülmesi de kurumların tanım ve işlevleri konusunda uzlaşma sağlanamadığından kısıtlar içeren bir diğer konudur. Bu çalışmanın amacı panel veri analiziyle 127 ülkenin 2006-2010 yılları arasındaki verileri kullanılarak hangi kurumsal yapının gelişme düzeyi üzerinde etkili olduğunu saptamaktır. Elde edilen bulgular ülke karakteristiklerinin ve gayrı resmi kurumların etkisine işaret etmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon c4s9m5.pdf
  • 9
80
104
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Acemoğlu, D. (2008). Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. New Jersey: Princeton
University Press.
Acemoğlu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. (2001). The Colonial Origins of Comparative
Development: An Emprical Investigation. The American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369-1401.
Ali, A. (2006). Growth, Poverty and Institutions: Is There a Missing Link?", Seminar Paper
in Poverty, Growth and Institutions, Resource:
http://www.api.org.kw/images/publication/pdfs/269/269_wps0601.pdf(02.02.2014).
Arrufıada, B.(2007), to Avoid when Measuring Institutions:Is Doing Business Damaging
Business?, Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(4), 729-47.
Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Sayı 9 Ocak-Nisan 2017
102
Arslan, Ü. (2007). Kurumların İktđsadi Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal
Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Ankara.
Ata, Ahmet Y. (2009). Kurumsal İktisat Çerçevesinde Yolsuzluğun Fırsat ve Motivasyonları:
AB Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora
Tezi, Adana.
Aysan, Ahmet F. (2007). Yönetişim ve Kurumlar Kavramlarının İktisat Literatüründeki
Yükselişi Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Uluslararası Ticaret ve Dış Ticaret Politikaları, 1(2), 27-
52.
Bardhan, P. (1989). The New Institutional Economics and Development Theory: A Brief
Critical Assesment. World Development, 17(9), 1389-1395.
Bardhan, P. (2006). Institutions and Development", in David Clark (ed.), Elgar Companion to
Development Studies, Elgar Publishing.
Bates, R., Greif, A., Humpreyes, M., Singh, S. (2004). Institutions and Development, CID
Working Paper No. 107.
Bontempi, M., Golinelli, R. (2012). Static Panel Data Analysis Lecture 9.1.
Chang, J. (2005). Understanding the Relationship between Institutions and Economic
Development- Some Key Theoretical Issues. Paper to be presented at the WIDER Jubilee
Conference, 17-18 June, Helsinki.
De, P. (2010). Governance, Institutions, and Regional Infrastructure in Asia. ADBI Working
Paper Series, 83.
Deaton, A. (1995). Data and Econometric Tools for Development Analysis. Handbook of
Development Economics, Elsevier Publishing, 1801-18.
Ergil, D. (2012). Toplum ve İnsan. Ankara: Hayat Akademi
Gwenhamo, F., Federke, J., Kadth, R. (2012). Measuring Institutions: Indicators of Political
Rights, Property Rights and Political Instability in Zimbabve, Journal of Peace Research,
49(4), 593–603.
Hsiao, C.(2005). Why Panel Data?.IEPR Working Paper, 5.33.
Hsiao, C. (2006), Panel Data Analysis – Advantages and Challenge. IEPR Working Paper .
06.49.
Jutting, J. (2003). Institutions and Development. OECD Development Center, Working Paper:
210.
Knowles , S., Wheatherston, C. (2006).Informal Institutions and Cross-Country Income
Differences. CREDIT Research Paper, No. 06/06.
Kuncic, A. (2013). Institutional Quality Datase. the 8. Young Economısts Semınar to19th
Dubrovnik Economic Conference, Crotea.
Lin, Y., Nugent, J. (1995). Institutions and Development in Handbook of Development, In: J.
Behrman, T. N. Srinivasan, (Ed) Handbook of Economic Development. North-Holland,
Amsterdam.
Myhrman, J. (1989). The New Institutional Economics and Process of Economic Development.
Journal of Economic Institutions and Theorotical Economics, 145, 38-59.
Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Sayı 9 Ocak-Nisan 2017
103
Morgan, J., Olsen, W. (2011). Conceptiual Issues in Institutional Economics: Clarifying the
Fludity of Rules. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3(1), 425-453.
North, D. (1991), Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 5(1), 97-112
North, D. (1992). Transaction Costs, Institutions and Economic Performance, Occasional
International Center of Economic Growth, Papers, 30.
Pamuk, Ş. (2012). Türkiye’nin 200 Yıllık İktisadi Tarihi (3. Baskı). Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür
Yayınları, İstanbul.
Przeworskı, A., Curvale, C. (2006). Political Institutions and Economic Development in the
Americas: the Long Run, , unpublished manuscript, Department of Politics, New York
University
Sen, A. (1983). Development:Which waynow?, The Economic Journal, 93(972), 745-762.
Sheirly, M. (2003). Institutions and Development, Erişim: http:// http://www.coase.org/wshirley2003institutionsanddevelopment.
pdf
Siba, E. (2008). Determinants of Institutional Quality in Sub-Saharan African Countries.
University of Gothenburg , School of Business, Economics and Law Workıng Papers ın
Economıcs, 310.
Tabellini, G. (2006). Institutions and Culture, European Economic Association Conference,
Budapest, Hungary.
Voight, S. (2007). How (Not) to Measure Institutions. Workshop Measuring Law &
Institutions, December 15-16, Paris, France.
Williamson, O. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking. Ahead,
Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 595-613.
Williamson C., Kerekes, C. (2011).Securing Private Property: Formal versus Informal
Institutions. Journal of Law and Economics, 54(3), 537-572.
Yaffee, R.(2003), A Primer for Panel Data Analysis, Access:
http://localgov.fsu.edu/readings_papers/Research%20Methods/Yafee_Promer_...
Analysis.pdf (Erişim:10.08.2014).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com