You are here

Home » Content

DERS KİTABINA DAYALI EĞİTİMDEN TEKNOLOJİ DESTEKLİ EĞİTİME GEÇİŞ: İNGİLİZCE DERSİNDE AKILLI TAHTA KULLANIMINA İLİŞKİN ÖĞRETMEN VE ÖĞRENCİ GÖRÜŞLERİ

A TRANSITION FROM COURSEBOOK-BASED LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION TOWARDS TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED CLASSROOMS: OPINIONS OF TEACHERS AND STUDENTS REGARDING INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARD TECHNOLOGY IN AN EFL CONTEXT

Journal Name:

  • Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This article reports on a case study conducted on Turkish teachers of English and Turkish learners regarding their opinions of interactive whiteboard in an intensive English language preparation program at a state university in Turkey. Although interactive whiteboards (Henceforth IWBs), and similar devices have been widely used by teachers in language classrooms the question of how efficient they are in language classrooms remains unanswered. The present study both reveals the English language teachers’ and learners’ opinions regarding the use of interactive whiteboards in language classes and explores the relationship between technology use and sense of professional development. The data presented in the article were collected through pre and post questionnaires along with structured individual interviews with the teachers. The findings of the research suggest that Turkish teachers’ opinions regarding interactive whiteboards changed in a positive way over time. Furthermore, it was found that using technology helps teachers develop a sense of ‘ableness’ which in turn is translated into more effective teaching practices. The findings also revealed that interactive whiteboards help students engage in the lesson and internalize the lesson content more effectively through visual representations.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çalışma Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Yabancı Diller yüksekokulunda eğitim gören öğrenci ve İngilizce’yi akıllı tahta kullanarak öğreten öğretmenlerin bu uygulamaya ilişkin görüşlerine yer vermektedir. Akıllı tahta ya da benzer araçları yabancı dil öğretilen sınıflarda yaygın bir şekilde kullanılmasına rağmen ne kadar etkin olduklarına ilişkin soru hala güncelliğini korumaktadır. Bu çalışma bir yandan akıllı tahta ortamında İngilizce öğrenen öğrencilerin ve İngilizce’yi akıllı tahta kullanarak öğreten öğretmenlerin görüşlerini irdelerken diğer yandan teknoloji ve mesleki gelişim arasında olması muhtemel ilişkiyi araştırmaktadır. Çalışmanın verileri ön-test ve son-test anketleriyle birlikte öğretmen ve öğrencilerle yapılan yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Son-test sonuçlarına dayalı olarak İngilizce öğretmenlerinin akıllı tahta kullanımına ilişkin düşüncelerinde olumlu bir değişim gözlenmiş olup akıllı tahta kullanımı çalışmaya katılan öğretmenlerde mesleki anlamda ‘yetkinlik’ hissi kazandırmıştır. Bu sonuçlara ek olarak, akıllı tahta kullanımı öğrencilerin derse daha iyi odaklanmasını sağlayarak ders materyallerini içselleştirmelerine katkıda bulunduğu görülmüştür.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ders-kitabina-dayali-egitimden-teknoloji-destekli-egitime-gecis-ingilizce-dersinde-akilli-tahta-kullanimina-iliskin-ogretmen-ogrenci-gorusleri.pdf
  • 33
193
210
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Arslan, B. Bilgisayar Destekli Eğitime Tabi Tutulan Ortaöğretim Öğrencileriyle
Bu Süreçte Eğitici Olarak Rol Alan Öğretmenlerin BDE’e İlişkin
Görüşleri. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology -
TOJET October 2003 ISSN: pp.1303-6521 Volume 2, Issue 4, 2003.
Aydinli-Mathews.J. & F. Elaziz. Turkish Students’ and Teachers’ Attitudes
Toward the Use of Interactive Whiteboards in EFL Classrooms,
Computer Assisted Language Learning 23 (3), pp.235-252. 2010.
Beauchamp.G Teachers’ Use of Interactive Whiteboard in Primary Schools.
Technology Pedagogy and Education. 13 (3). Pp.327-348, 2004.
Beeland. W. D. Student Engagement, Visual Learning and Technology: Can
Interactive Whiteboards help? Retrieved May 23 2012 from http://
chiron.aldosta.edu.are/Artmanscrpt vol 1 no 1 beeland_am.pdf. 2002.
Bell. M.A. Why Use an Interactive Whiteboard? A Baker’s Dozen Reasons!
Teachers.Net.Gazette. Retrieved May 23, 2012. from
http://teachers.net.gazette./JAN02/mabell.html.2002.
Dupagne, M. & K. A. Krendl . Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Computers: A
Review of the Literature. Journal of Research on Computing in
Education, 24 (3), pp.420-429. 1992
Dusick . D. M. The Learning Effectiveness of Educational Technology: What Does
That Really Mean?. Educational Technology Review, 10 (2). pp.10-12
.1998
Egbert. J & Yoko Nakamichi . The Impact Of Call Trena M. Paulus Instruction on
Classroom Computer Use: A Foundation For Rethinking Technology in
Teacher Education. Language Learning & Technology 6 (3). pp. 108-
126 .2002.
Ely. D.P Conditions That Facilitate the Implementation of Educational
Technology Innovations. Journal of Research on Computing in
Education, 23 (2 ).pp. 298-305 . 1990.
Glesne, C & Peshkin, A. Becoming Qualitative Researcher: An introduction. New
York: Longman . 1992.
Glover, D & D. Miller. Running With Technology: The Pedagogic Impact of the
Large Scale Introduction of Interactive Whiteboards in One Secondary
School. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10,
pp. 257-276. 2001.
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Sayı: 33 Yıl:2012/2 (193-210 s.)
209
Hall. & S. Higgins. Primary Schools Students’ Perceptions of Interactive
Whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21 (2), pp. 102-
117. 2005.
İnal, S. İngilizce Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilgisayara Yönelik Tutumlarının Bazı
Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi 6. Uluslararası Eğitim Teknolojileri
Konferansı, Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi, 19-21 Nisan 2006.Gazi Mağusa/
KKTC. 2006.
İnal, S. İngilizce Öğretmenlerinin Eğitim Teknolojisini Kullanma Sıklığı 5th
International Educational Technology Conference. The Ohio State
University & Sakarya University.Sakarya/Türkiye.2005.
Latham. P. Teaching and Learning Mathematics: The Impact of Interactive
Whiteboards Results of the North Islington Education action Zone RM
Easiteach Mathematics Project. London: BEAM Education. 2002.
Lee,B. & M.Boyle. Teachers Tell Their Story: Interactive Whiteboards at
Richardson Primary School. Retrieved May 23, 2012 from
www.iwb.net.au/advice publications/documents/Teachersstory2.doc,
2004.
Levy. P .Interactive Whiteboards in Learning and Teaching in Two Sheffield
Schools: A Developmental Study. Retrieved May 23, 2012 from
http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm. 2002.
Marcinkiewicz,H. R. Computers and Teachers: Factors Influencing
Computer Use in the Classroom. Journal of Research on Computing
in Education, 26 (2), pp. 220-237. 1994.
Martin. S. Interactive whiteboards nd Talking Books: A New Approach to
Teaching Children to Write? Literacy, 4 (1)., pp.26-34. 2007.
Moss,G. Jewitt, c. Levaaic. R. Armstrong. V. Cardini. A.,& Castle, F. The
Interactive Whiteboard, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance Evaluation.
Retrieved May 23, 2012, from
www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR816.pdf. 2007
Patton, M. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA:
Sage Publications. 1990.
Silva, P., de Oliveira Marcelo, M.A., & Ferreira da Cruz, M.R.D. The Benefits of
Using Interactive Whiteboards in Teaching English as Foreign Language
to Young Learners Learning Process. Presentation given at Humanities
Conference 08, Istanbul, July 15-18, http://h08.cgpublisher.com/
proposals/274/index_html. 2008.
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Sayı: 33 Yıl:2012/2 (193-210 s.)
210
Smith. A. Interactive Whitebord Evaluation. Retrieved May 23, 2012, from
http://www.mirandanet.ac.uk/pubssmartboards.htm. K.Wall et.al. The
Visual Helps Me Understand the Complicated Things: Pupil Views of
Teaching and Learning with Interactive Whiteboards. British Journal of
Educational Technology, 36 (5), pp.851-867. 2005.
Verdugo, R. D. & Belmonto, I. A. Usıng Digital Stories To Improve Listening
Comprehension Wıth Spanish Young Learners Of Englısh. Language
Learning & Technology . 11, (1), pp. 87-101. 2007.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com