You are here

Home » Content

ZEKA TÜRLERİ, ÖĞRENCİLERİN YABANCI DİL BAŞARILARI VE SEÇİLMİŞ DEĞİŞKENLER ÜZERİNE BİR ÇALIŞMA

A STUDY OF MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES, FOREIGN LANGUAGE SUCCESS AND SOME SELECTED VARIABLES

Journal Name:

  • Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between students’ gender and intelligence types, the relationship between particular intelligence types and students’ success in grammar, listening and writing in English as a foreign language and the relationship between parental education and students’ types of intelligences. Preparatory class students (n=144) attending Erciyes University’s School of Foreign Languages participated in the study and the data was collected through the Multiple Intelligences Inventory for Adults. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test analysis, correlation analysis and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to analyze the data. Analysis of the data revealed no significant gender differences in the intelligence types held by the participants except for that between gender and linguistic intelligence which was positive. Negative but significant relationships were found between success in students’ test scores in grammar and bodily-kinesthetic, spatial, and intrapersonal intelligences whereas the relationship between musical intelligence and writing was found to be significant and positive. Finally, no significant relationship was found between parental education and students’ intelligence types.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalısmanın amacı cinsiyet ile ögrencilerin zekâ türleri arasında, belirli zekâ türleri ile ögrencilerin +ngilizce dilbilgisi, dinleme ve yazma basarıları arasında ve ögrencilerin zekâ türleri ile anne ve babalarının egitim seviyeleri arasında bir iliski olup olmadıgını arastırmaktır. Erciyes Üniversitesi Yabancı Diller Yüksekokulu’nda ögrenim gören 144 hazırlık sınıfı ögrencisi çalısmada yer almıs ve veri toplama aracı olarak Yetiskinler için Çoklu Zekâ Envanter’i kullanılmıs ve veriler tanımlayıcı istatistikler, bagımsız örneklem t-testi, korelasyon katsayısı ve tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) teknikleri ile analiz edilmistir. Çalısmanın sonuçlarına göre, kız ve erkek ögrenciler arasında zekâ türleri açısından anlamlı bir iliski bulunmamaktadır. Cinsiyet ile dilsel zekâ arasında pozitif bir iliski oldugu ortaya çıkmıstır. Bedensel-duyusal, uzaysal ve bireysel-içedönük zekâ ile dilbilgisi arasında olumsuz ama anlamlı bir iliski çıkarken, müziksel zekâ ile yazma becerisi arasındaki iliski olumlu ve anlamlıdır. Son olarak, anne ve babanın egitim seviyelerinin ögrencilerin zekâ türleri üzerinde etkisinin olmadıgı saptanmıstır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 15-425-1-pb.pdf
  • 2
110-122
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Albert, D. H., & Reed, J. (2008). What really matters: A conversation between
David H. Albert and Joyce Reed. Life Learning Magazine, March/
April, 8-32. Retrieved June 19, 2009, from
http://www.lifelearningmagazine.com/0804/MarApr08.pdf
Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Alexandria,
VA: ASCD.
Armstrong, T. (2001). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Alexandria,
VA: ASCD.
Barrington, E. (2004). Teaching to student diversity in higher education: how
multiple intelligence theory can help. Teaching in Higher Education,
9(4), 421-434.
Chen, J-Q., & Gardner, H. (2005). Assessment based on multiple intelligences
theory. In D. P. Flanagan (Ed.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment:
Theories, Tests, and Issues (77-102). New York: Guilford Press.
Emig, V. B. (1997). A multiple intelligences inventory. Educational
Leadership, 55(1), 47-50.
Fogarty, R., & Stoehr, J. (2008). Integrating curricula with multiple
intelligences: Teams, themes, & threads. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
Press.
Haley, M. H. (2004). Learner-centered instruction and the theory of multiple
intelligences with second language learners. Teachers College Record,
106(1), 163-180.
Hamurlu, M. K. (2007). The effect of instruction based on multiple
intelligences theory on the students’ achievements in English and their
attitudes towards English at 9th grade at foreign language based high
school. Unpublished MA thesis, Gaziantep University, Graduate School
of Social Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Gaziantep:
Turkey.
Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: how
to reach and teach all learners, grades 3-12. Minneapolis, MN: Free
Spirit Pub.
Loori, A. A. (2005). Multiple intelligences: a comparative study between the
preferences of males and females. Social Behavior and Personality,
33(1), 77-88.
McMahon, S. D., & Rose, D. S. (2004). Multiple intelligences and reading
achievement: an examination of the Teele Inventory of Multiple
Intelligences. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73(1), 41-52.
Moran, S., Kornhaber, M., & Gardner, H. (2006). Orchestrating multiple
intelligences. Educational Leadership, 64(1), 22-27.
Noble, T. (2004). Integrating the revised Bloom’s taxonomy with multiple
intelligences: a planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teachers
College Record, 106(1), 193-211.
Nolen, J. L. (2003). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Education,
124(1), 115-119.
Özdemir, P., Güneysu, S., & Tekkaya C. (2006). Enhancing learning through
multiple intelligences. Educational Research, 40(2), 74-78.
Poole, G. T. (2000). Application of the theory of multiple intelligences to
second language learners in classroom situations. Speech at the
National Association of African American Studies & National
Association of Hispanic and Latino Studies: 2000 Literature
Monograph Series 21-26 February 2000, Houston.
Rahimi, A., & Abedini, A. (2009). The Interface between EFL Learners' Self-
Efficacy Concerning Listening Comprehension and Listening
Proficiency. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 3(1),
14-28.
Razmjoo, S. A. (2008). On the relationship between multiple intelligences and
language success. The Reading Matrix, 8(2), 155-174.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in
language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shearer, C. B. (2004). Using a multiple intelligences assessment to promote
teacher development and student achievement. Teachers College
Record, 106(1), 147-162.
Shore, J. R. (2004). Teacher education and multiple intelligences: a case study
of multiple intelligences and teacher efficacy in two teacher preparation
courses. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 112-139.
Smith, E. (2001). Implications of multiple intelligences theory for second
language learning. Post-Script, 2(1), 32-52.
Sad, N., & Arıbas, S. (2008). The levels of teachers at primary schools to
employ materials and activities based on multiple intelligences theory:
Malatya sample. Inönü Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(15),
169-187.
Teele, S. (2000). Rainbows of intelligence: Exploring how students learn.
USA: Corwin Press.
Yilmaz, G., & Fer, S. (2003). Çok yönlü zeka alanlarına göre düzenlenen
ögretim etkinliklerine iliskin ögrencilerin görüsleri ve basarıları.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, 235-245.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com