You are here

AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF TRADING VOLUME AND RETURN VOLATILITY RELATIONSHIP IN THE TURKISH STOCK MARKET

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper investigates the volume-return volatility relationship for 25 individual stocks in the Turkish stock market, using daily data for the period 1998-2005. The results indicate that trading volume significantly contributes to the return volatility process of stocks in Turkish stock market, as suggested in many studies. On the other hand, the results also signify that the trading volume has no significant effect on the reduction of the volatility persistence for majority of stocks in the sample, challenging the presence of “Mixed Distribution Hypothesis” in Turkish stock market. These results are consistent with the empirical findings of a number of studies in emerging markets, including with those done in Turkish stock market.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, 1998-2005 dönemi günlük veriler kullanılarak Türk hisse senedi piyasasında işlem gören 25 hisse senedi için işlem hacmi ve getiri volatilitesi ilişkisi incelenmiştir. Çalışma sonuçları, diğer birçok çalışma bulguları ile paralellik gösterecek şekilde, işlem hacminin Türk hisse senedi piyasasında hisselerin getiri volatilite süreçlerini anlamlı bir şekilde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Öte yandan, sonuçlar, aynı zamanda, işlem hacminin birçok hisse senedinin volatilite sürekliliğinin azalmasında önemli bir etkisi olmadığını da ortaya koymaktadır. Bu sonuç, Türk hisse senedi piyasasında “Karışık Dağılımlar Hipotezi”nin geçerli olmadığına işaret etmektedir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, Türk hisse senedi piyasası da dahil olmak üzere, gelişmekte olan ülkelerde yapılan birçok çalışma sonucu ile tutarlılık göstermektedir.
115-125

REFERENCES

References: 

ADMATI, A. R. ve PFLEIDERER, P. (1988): “A
theory of intraday patterns: volume and price
variability” , Review of Financial Studies, 1, 3-40.
AHMED, H. J. A., HASSAN, A. ve NASIR, A.
M. D. (2005): “The Relationship between Trading
Volume, Volatility and Stock market Returns: A
Test of Mixed Distribution Hypothesis for a Preand
Post Crisis on Kuala Lumpur Stock
Exchange”, Investment Management and
Financial Innovations, 3, 146-158.
ANDERSEN, Torben G. (1996): “Return
Volatility and Trading Volume: An Information
Flow Interpretation of Stochastic Volatility”,
Journal of Finance, 51, 169-204.
BALABAN, Ercan. (1995): “Day of the week
effects: new evidence from an emerging stock
market”, Applied Economics Letters, 2, 139-143.
BASCI, Erdem, OZYILDIRIM K. ve
AYDOGAN Kursat. (1996): “A Note on Price-
Volume Dynamics in an Emerging Stock
Market.”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 20,
389-400.
BOHL, Martin ve HENKE H. (2003): “Trading
volume and stock market volatility: The Polish
case”, International Review of Financial Analysis,
153, 1-13.
BOLLERSLEV, Tim. (1986): “Generalized
Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity”,
Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327.
BRAILSFORD, Timothy J. (1994): “The
Empirical relationship Between Trading Volume,
Returns and Volatility”, Research Paper,
Department of Accounting and Finance,
University of Melbourne, No: 1994-01, 1-33.
BROCK, William A. ve LEBARON, Blake D.
(1996): “A Dynamic Structural Model for Stock
Return Volatility and Trading Volume”, Review
of Economics and Statistics, 78, 94-110.
CHEN, Gong-Meng, FIRTH, Michael ve RUI
Oliver M.(2001): “The Dynamic Relation
Between Stock Returns, Trading Volume, and
Volatility”, Financial Review, 36, 153-174.
CLARK, P. (1973): “A subordinated stochastic
process model with finite variance for speculative
prices”, Econometrica, 91,135-156.
DICKEY, David A.ve FULLER, Wayne A.
(1979): “Distribution of the Estimators for
Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root.”,
Journal of the American Statistical Association,
427-431.
ENGLE, Robert F. (1982): “Autoregressive
Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of
the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation”,
Econometrica, 50, 987-1008.
FOSTER, Douglas F. ve VISWANATHAN, S.
(1993): “Variations in Trading Volume, Return
Volatility, and Trading Costs: Evidence on Recent
Price Formation Models”, Journal of Finance, 48,
187-211.
GALLAGHER, Liam ve KIELY, Daniel. (2005):
“Volume and GARCH Effects for Dual-Listed
Equities: Evidence from Irish Equities”, The Irish
Accounting Review, 12, 63-82.
GALLO, Giampiero M.ve PACINI, Barbara.
(2000): “The effects of trading activity on market
volatility”, The European Journal of Finance, 163
– 175.
GLOSTEN, Lawrence ve JAGANNATHAN,
Ravi. (1993): “On the Relation between the
Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal
Excess Return on Stocks”, Journal of Finance, 48,
1779-1801.
GUNDUZ, Lokman ve HATEMI, Abdulnasser.
(2005): “Stock Price and Volume Relation in
124
Emerging Markets”, Emerging Markets Finance
and Trade, 41, 29-44.
GUNER, Nuray ve ONDER Zeynep. (2002) :
“Information and Volatility: Evidence from an
Emerging Market”, Emerging Markets Finance
and Trade , 38, 26-46.
HE, H. ve WANG J. (1995): “Differential
informational and dynamic behavior of stock
trading volume”, The Review of Financial
Studies, 8, 919-972.
HUANG, B.-N ve YANG, C. W. (2001): “An
empirical investigation of trading volume and
return volatility of the Taiwan Stock Market”,
Global Finance Journal, 12, 55-77.
JONES, C.M. , KAUL, G. ve LIPSON, M.L.
(1994): “Transactions, volume, and volatility”,
The Review of Financial Studies, 7, 631-651.
KWIATKOWSKI, D., PHILLIPS, P. C. B.,
SCHMIDT, P. ve SHIN, Y. (1992): “Testing the
null hypothesis of stationarity against the
alternative of a unit root”, Journal of
Econometrics, 54, 159-178.
KYLE, A.S. (1988): “Trading halts and price
limits”, Review of Futures Markets, 10, 136-175.
LAMOUREUX, Christopher G. ve LASTRAPES,
William D. (1994): “Endogenous Trading
Volume and Momentum in Stock-Return
Volatility”, Journal of Business & Economic
Statistics, 12, 253-260.
LAMOUREUX, Christopher G. ve LASTRAPES,
William D. (1990): “Heteroskedasticity in Stock
Return Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects”,
Journal of Finance, 45, 221-229.
MCKENZIE , Michael D ve FAFF, Robert W.
(2003): “The Determinants of Conditional
Autocorrelation in Stock Returns”, The Journal of
Financial Research, 26, 259- 274.
MORGAN, I. G. (1976): “Stock Prices and
Heteroscedasticity”, Journal of Business, 49, 496-
508.
OMRAN, M. F. ve MCKENZIE, E. (2000):
“Heteroscedasticity in stock returns data revisited:
volume versus GARCH effects”, Applied
Financial Economics , 10, 553-560.
PYUN, C.S., LEE S.Y. ve NAM, K. (2000):
“Volatility and information flows in emerging
equity market - A case of the Korean Stock
Exchange”, International Review of Financial
Analysis, 9, 405-420.
SABRI, Nidal Rashid. (2004): “Stock Return
Volatility and Market Crisis in Emerging
Economies”, Review of Accounting and Finance,
3, 59-83.
SALMAN, Ferhan. (2002): “Risk-return-volume
relationship in an emerging stock market”,
Applied Economics Letters, 9, 549-552.
STOLL, H.R. ve WHALEY, R.E. (1990): “Stock
market structure and volatility”, The Review of
Financial Studies, 3, 37-71.
TAUCHEN, George E. ve PITTS, Mark. (1983):
“The Price Variability-Volume Relationship on
Speculative Markets”, Econometrica, 51, 485-
505.
WANG, P. ve LIU, A. (2005): “Stock Return
Volatility and Trading Volume: Evidence from
the Chinese Stock Market”, Journal of Chinese
Economic and Business Studies, 3, 39-54.
YUKSEL, A. (2002): “The performance of the
Istanbul Stock Exchange during the Russian
crisis”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 38,
78-99.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com