You are here

FROM DETERRENCE TO PRE-EMPTION

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
International terrorism is a matter of growing concern to governments since the 1980s. According to the United States, international terrorism became more dangerous in this new century, now that rouge states are acquiring WMD. How can we deter rouge states from resorting to WMDattacks? Before it is too late to act, the US decision is to remove this danger. Traditional Cold War approaches in deterrence policy are no more used. US policy is to apply pre-emptive strike against rouge states believed to develop WMD. This article examines pre-emptive strike strategy in the struggle against international terrorism. It is divided into two sections. The first part involves conceptual analysis of the term pre-emptive strike and its recognition in the UN. The second section reviews some of the critics of this strategy. Rather than evaluating if the pre-emptive strike is right or wrong, it is an attempt to explain the changes in US policy.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Uluslararası terör 1980’lerden sonra hükümetler için gittikçe artan öneme sahip olmuştur. ABD’ye gore yeni yüzyılda haydut devletler kitle imha silahlarına sahip olmaya başlayınca uluslararası terör daha tehlike hale gelmiştir. Haydut devletlerin kitle imha silahları kullanarak saldırmasına nasıl engel olabiliriz? ABD bu tehlikenin geç olmadan ortadan kaldırılması görüşündedir. Klasik Soğuk Savaşdönemi caydırma politikaları artık geçerli değildir. ABD politikası kitle imha silahları üretildiği varsayulan bu haydut devletlere karşı önlem alıcı müdahale yapılması yönündedir. Bu makalede uluslararası terörle mücadelede önlem alıcı saldırıstratejisi incelenmiştir. Makale iki bölümden oluşmuştur. Đlk bölümde önlem alıcı müdahele ile ilgili kavramsal analiz ve BirleşmişMilletler’de tanınması yer almıştır. Đkinci bölümde bu strateji ile ilgili bazı kritiklere yer verilmiştir. Bu çalışma önlem alıcı müdahalenin doğru veya yanlışolup olmadığının analizinden ziyade Amerikan politikasındaki değişimi göstermeye çalışmaktadır.
186-200

REFERENCES

References: 

Arend, Anthony (Spring 2003), “International Law and Preemptive Use of
Military Force”, The Washington Quarterly, 26(2): 89-103.
Betts, Richard K. (1998), “The New Threats of Mass Destruction”, Foreign
Affairs, 77(1): 26-41.
Betts, Richard K. (02, March 2003), “Striking First: A History of Thankfully
Lost opportunities”, Carnegie Council on Ethics andInternational Affairs, on
Carnegie Council web site (http: //www.carngiecouncil.org)
Betts, Richard K. (Jan/Feb 2003), “Suicide from Fear or Death”, Foreign
Affairs, 82(1), EBSOhost, April 20, 2005
Blechman, Barry M. and Tamar Cofman Wittes (1999), “Defining Moment:
The Threat and use of force in American Foreign Policy, Demetrios James
Caraley (ed.), in The New American Interventionism:Essays from Political
science Quarterly, Columbia: Columbia University Press.
Bolton, John R. (November 1, 2002), “The International Aspects of Terrorism
and WMD”, Hudson Institute Conference
Cirincione, Joseph (July/August 2003), “Can Preventive War Cure
Proliferation?”, Foreign Policy and Carnegie Endowment Special Report
Crawford, Neta C. (March 02, 2003), “The Slippery Slope to Preventive War”,
Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs, on Carnegie Council web
site (http: //www.carngiecouncil.org)
Currie, Duncan E. J. (2003), “Preventive War and International Law After
Iraq”, on Global law web site
(http://www.globallaw.com/Iraq/preventive_war_after_iraq.htm, 22/03/2005)
198
Dombrowski, Peter and Rodger A. Payne (2003), “Global Debate and the
Limits of the Bush Doctrine,” International Studies Perspectives, 4: 395-408.
Dougherty, James E. and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. (2001), Contending Theories
of International Relations, New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Fifth Edition,
p. 344-397.
Drumbl, Mark A. (2003), “Self defense and the use of force,” International
Studies Perspectives, 4: 409-431.
Fuerth, Leon (August 23/2002), “Alliances for the Next Generation”,
Washington Post.
Gordon, Philip H. (Spring 2003), “Bush’s Middle East Vision”, Survival, 45(1):
155-165.
Hammond, John L. (Spring 2005), “The Bush Doctrine,Preventive War, and
International Law”, the Philosophical Forum,36(1), EBSCOhost, April 20,
2005
Joetze, Günter (2004), “Doctrine and Practice of Preventive War”, Peace
Research Institute Frankfurt Reports, No.70
Kagan, Robert (2002), “Power and Weakness”, Policy Review, No. 113.
Kegley, Charles W. and Gregory A. Raymond (2003), “Policy focus: Military
Intervention in a changing World”, International Studies Perspective”,4( 4).
Kegley, Charles W. and Gregory A. Raymond (2004), “Global Terrorism and
Military Preemption: Policy problems and Normative Perils”, International
Politics, 41: 37-49.
Kellner, Douglas (September 2004), “Preemptive strikes and the war on Iraq”,”
New Political Science, 26(3): 417-440.
Krasner, Stephen D. (Jan/Feb 2005), “The day after”, Foreign Policy, 146: 68-71. EBSCOhost, April 20, 2005
Kupchan, Charles A. (Feb 4, 2003), “United States should scrap Iraqi
occupation plans”, The Modern Tribune.
199
Kupchan, Charles A. (February 17, 2003), “Uneasy alliances”, The Modern
Tribune
Lakensky, Scott B. (March 30, 2003), “Right war, Wrong Doctrine”, The
Jerusalem Post
Leffler, Melvyn P. (2003), “9/11 and the past and future of American foreign
policy”, International Affairs, 79(5): 1045-1063.
Luban, David J. (2004), “Preventive War”, Working Paper Series in Public Law
and Legal Theory, Georgetown University Law center,No. 469862, Philosophy
and Public Affairs, 32(3).
McIntyre, David (September 2002), “Understanding the New National Security
Strategy of the United States”, Anser Institute forHomeland Security, Institute
Analysis 009
Moore, Mike (Jan/Feb2003), “Truman Got it Right”, Bulletin of the Atomic
Sciences, 59(1), EBSCOhost, April 20, 2005
Mueller, John and Brink Lindsey (2003), “Should we invade Iraq”, Reason,
34(8) EBSCOhost. April 20, 2005
Nye, Joseph S. (July/August 2003), “US power and Strategy After Iraq”
Foreign Affairs, 82(4)
Patrick, Stewart (Fall 2001), “Don’t Fence me in: The perils of going it alone”,
World policy Journal, from World Wide Web page Http:
//www.worldpolicy.org/journal/articles/wpj01-3/Patrick.pdf
Record, Jeffrey (July 8, 2004), “Nuclear Deterrence, preventive War and
Counter proliferation”, CATO Institute, Policy Analysis, No. 519
Report of the Task Force on Peace and Security, UN Association (June 17,
2003), “The US Doctrine of Preemptive Attack – RealProblem, Wrong
answers”.
Schroeder, Paul W. (October 21, 2003), “Iraq: The case Against Preemptive
War”, The American Conservative,No1: 8-20.
Welsh, Steven C. (December 5, 2003), “Preemptive War and International
Law”, International Security Law Project.
200
Wirtz, James J. and James A. Russell (Spring 2003),“U.S. Policy on Preventive
War and Preemption” , The Nonproliferation Review
Wirtz, James J. and James A. Russell (November 4, 2002), “Preventive War
Against Iraq”, Strategic Insight
“The National Security Strategy (NSS)” issued by the Bush Administration
(2002)
“A Human Security Doctrine to Europe” (2004), The Barcelona Report of the
Security Group on Europe’s Security Capabilities
“NATO’s Approach to Proliferation” (September 1995), NATO Basic Fact
sheet, NATO Office of Information and Press, No:8.
“The Alliance Strategic Concept”, NATO Press Release (24 April, 1999), from
World Wide Web page Http: //www.nato.int/docu/pr/1999/p99-065e.htm, April
04, 2001
“Tackling Terror: NATO’S new Mission” (20 June, 2002), Speech by NATO
Secretary General, Lord Robertson, at the American Enterprise Institute’s New
Atlantic Initiative, Washington, DC, from world wide web page Http:
//www.nato.int/docu/speech/2002/s020620a.htm, February 14, 2005
“The European Security Strategy” issued by the European Security Council,
Brussels (2003), from world wide web page Http: //www.
ue.eu.int/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf, April 30, 2004.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com