You are here

Kamu Harcamaları ve Kamu Gelirleri Arasındaki İlişki: Panel Nedensellik Analizi

The Relationship between Public Expenditure and Public Revenue: Panel Causality Analysis

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Today, most of the OECD member countries faced with high budget deficits. This case brings up the discussions on priority of reducing the budget deficits using expenditure or taxes to the agenda. For this reason, the relationship between public expenditure and public revenue has a great importance for policy makers. In this study the causality relationship between public expenditure and public revenue are investigated based on 34 OECD member countries annual data over 1994-2007 period. Empirical results of this study mainly support the positive relationship between public expenditures and tax revenues. Moreover, the results of Holtz-Eakin causality tests indicate the unidirectional causality running from tax revenues to public expenditures and the validity of tax-spend hypothesis for OECD member countries. Our findings are inconsistent with the traditional view that increasing tax revenues can be reduced budget deficits.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Günümüzde OECD üyesi ülkelerin birçoğu yüksek bütçe açıkları ile karşı karşıyadır. Bu durum, bütçe açıklarını azaltmada vergilere mi yoksa kamu harcamalarına mı öncelik verileceğine yönelik tartışmaları gündeme getirmiştir. Bu nedenle kamu harcamaları ve kamu gelirleri arasındaki ilişki politika belirleyicileri açısından büyük önem ihtiva etmektedir. Bu çalışmada 34 OECD üyesi ülkenin 1994-2007 dönemi yıllık verilerine dayanılarak kamu harcamaları ile kamu gelirleri arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi ele alınmıştır. Bu çalışmanın ampirik sonuçları, kamu harcamaları ile vergi gelirleri arasında pozitif bir ilişkiyi desteklemektedir. Bununla birlikte Holtz-Eakin nedensellik test sonuçları, vergilerden kamu harcamalarına yönelik tek taraflı bir nedensellik ilişkisine ve OECD ülkeleri için vergi-harcama hipotezinin geçerliliğine işaret etmektedir. Bu bulgu, vergi gelirlerinin arttırılması sonucu bütçe açıklarının azaltılabileceği yönündeki geleneksel görüşe uygun düşmemektedir.
115-143

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Abual-Foul, B. ve H. Baghestani (2004), “The Causal Relation between
Government Revenue and Spending: Evidence from Egypt and Jordan”,
Journal of Economics and Finance, 28 (2), 260–269.
Ahiakpor, J. C. W. ve S. Amirkhalkhali (1989), “On the Difficulty of
Eliminating Deficits with Higher Taxes: Some Canadian Evidence”, Southern
Economic Journal 56, 24-31.
Akçağlayan, Anıl ve M. Kayıran (2010), “Türkiye`de Kamu Harcamaları ve
Gelirleri: Nedensellik İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Osmangazi Üniversitesi
İİBF Dergisi, Ekim 2010, 129-130.
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,
Cilt:27, Sayı:2, Yıl:2012, ss.115-143.
139
Akçoraoglu, A. (1999), “Kamu Harcamaları, Kamu Gelirleri ve Keynesci
Politikalar: Bir Nedensellik Analizi”, Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 2, 51-65.
Alfonso, A. ve C. Rault (2009), “Spend and Tax: A Panel Data
Investigation for The EU”, Economics Bulletin, 29(4), 2542-2548.
Al-Qudair, K.H.A. (2005), “The Relationship Between Government
Expenditure and Revenues in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Testing for
Cointegration and Causality”, JKAU, 19(1), 31–43.
Anderson W., M.S. Wallace ve J.T. Warner (1986), “Government Spending
and Taxation: What Causes What?”, Southern Economic Association, 52(3),
630-639.
Apergis, N., J. E. Payne ve J. W. Saunoris (2012),"Tax-spend Nexus in
Greece: Are There Asymmetries?", Journal of Economic Studies, 39 (3), 327 –
336.
Arellano, M. ve S. Bond (1991), “Some Tests of Specification for Panel
Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and An Application to Employment Equations”,
Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.
Aslan, M. ve M. Tasdemir (2009), “Is Fiscal Synchronization Hypothesis
Relevant for Turkey? Evidence from Cointegration and Causality Tests with
Endogenous Structural Breaks”, Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 12,
14-25.
Baghestani, H., ve R. McNown (1994), “Do Revenues or Expenditures
Respond to Budgetary Disequilibria?”, Southern Economic Journal, 60 (2),
311–322.
Barro, R. J. (1979), “On The Determination of The Public Debt”, Journal of
Political Economy, 81, 940-971.
Bohn, H. (1991), “Budget Balance Through Revenue or Spending
Adjustments?”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 27, 333-359.
Buchanan, J. M. ve R. W. Wagner (1977), Democracy in Deficit: The
Political Legacy of Lord Keynes, New York: Academic Press.
Chang T., W. R. Liu ve S. B. Caudill (2002), “Tax and Spend, Spend and
Tax, or Fiscal Synchronization: New Evidence for Ten Countries”, Applied
Economics, 34, 1553–1561.
Chang, T. ve G. Chiang (2009), “Revisiting the Government Revenue-
Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from 15 OECD Countries Based On the Panel
Data Approach”, Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 59(2), 165-172.
Chang, T. ve Y.H. Ho (2002), “A Note on Testing Tax and Spend, Spend
and Tax or Fiscal Synchronization: The Case of China”, Journal of Economic
Development, 27(1), 151-160.
Dökmen/Kamu Harcamaları…
140
Chen, S. (2008), “Untangling The Web of Causalities Among Four
Disaggregate Government Expenditures, Government Revenue and Output in
Taiwan”, Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 6 (1), 99-107.
Cheng, B. S. (1999), “Causality Between Taxes and Expenditures: Evidence
from Latin American Countries”, Journal of Economics and Finance 23 (2),
184-92.
Choi, I. (2001), “Unit Root Test for Panel Data”, Journal of International
Money and Finance, 20(2), 249-272.
Çavuşoğlu, A.T. (2008), “Türkiye’de Kamu Gelirleri ile Kamu Harcamaları
Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi
Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 143-160.
Darrat, A.F. (1998), “Tax and Spend or Spend and Tax? An Inquiry into
The Turkish Budgetary Process”, Southern Economic Journal, 64(4), 940-956.
Eita, J. H. ve D. Mbazima (2008), “The Causal Relationship Between
Government Expenditure and Revenue in Namibia”, MPRA Paper No. 9154,
University of Munich.
Fasano U. ve Q. Wang (2002), “Testing the Relationship Between
Government Spending and Revenue: Evidence from GCC Countries”, IMF,
Working Paper, No. 21.
Friedman, M. (1978), “The Limitations of Tax Limitation”, Policy Review,
Summer, 7, 14.
Gounder, N. ve P. K. Narayan (2005), “An Empirical Investigation of the
Relationship Between Government Revenue and Expenditure: The Case of the
Fiji Islands”, In submission at International Review of Applied Economics, 24.
Granger, C.W.J. (1980), “Testing for Causality: A Personal Viewpoint”,
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2, 329-352.
Günaydın, İ. (2004), “Vergi‐Harcama Tartışması: Türkiye Örneği”, Doğuş
Üniversitesi Dergisi, 5(2), 163‐181.
Hasan, M. ve I. Lincoln (1997), “Tax Then Spend or Spend Then Tax?
Experience in the UK 1961- 1993”, Applied Economics Letters, 4, 237-239.
Hazine (2012), Kamu Finansmanı İstatistikleri,
http://www.hazine.gov.tr/irj/portal/anonymous?NavigationTarget=navurl://...
5b252efea63752bıcb4eıcc8ı997&InitialNodeFirstLevel=true, (14.10.2012).
Henrekson, M. (1993), “The Peacock-Wiseman Hypothesis”, The Growth
of The Public Sector, Theories and International Evidence, Ed. In N. Gemmell,
53–71. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Holtz-Eakın, D., W. Newey ve H.S. Rosen (1988), “Estimating Vector
Autoregressions with Panel Data”, Econometrica, 56, 1371-1395.
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,
Cilt:27, Sayı:2, Yıl:2012, ss.115-143.
141
Hondroyiannis, G., ve E. Papapetrou (1996), “An Examination of The
Causal Relationship Between Government Spending and Revenue:
Acointegration Analysis”, Public Choice, 89 (3-4), 363-374.
Hussain, M. H. (2004), “On the Causal Relationship Between Government
Expenditure and Tax Revenue in Pakistan”, The Lahore Journal of Economics,
9(2), 105 118.
Im, K. S., M. H. Peseran ve Y. Shin (2003), “Testing for Unit Roots in
Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-63.
Katrakilidis, C. P. (1997), “Spending and Revenues in Greece: New
Evidence from Error Correction Modelling”, Applied Economics Letters, 4 (6),
387-391.
Kirmanoğlu, H. (2009), Kamu Ekonomisi Analizi, 2. Baskı, İstanbul: Beta
Yayınevi.
Koren, S. ve A. Stiassny (1998), “Tax and Spend, or Spend and Tax? An
International Study”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 20, 163-191.
Kök, R. ve Ş. Nevzat (2006), “Endüstri-İçi Dış Ticaret, Patentler ve
Uluslararası Teknolojik Yayılma”, Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu Uluslararası
Ekonomi Konferansı, 11-13 Eylül 2006, Ankara.
Li, X. (2001), “Government Revenue, Government Expenditure, and
Temporal Causality: Evidence from China”, Applied Economics, 23, 485- 497.
Maddala, G.S. ve S. Wu (1999), “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests
With Panel Data and a New Simple Test”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and
Statistics, Special Issue, 61, 631-652.
Manage, N. ve M. L. Marlow (1986), “The Causal Relation Between
Federal Expenditures and Receipts”, Southern Economic Journal, 52, 617-29.
Meltzer, A. H. ve S. F. Richard (1981), “A Rational Theory of The Size of
Government”, Journal of Political Economy, 89, 914-927.
Narayan, P. K. (2005), “The Government Revenue and Government
Expenditure Nexus: Empirical Evidence from Nine Asian Countries”, Journal
of Asian Economics, 15, 1203–1216.
Narayan, P. K. ve S. Narayan (2006), “Government Revenue and
Government Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from Developing Countries”,
Applied Economics, 38, 285–291.
OECD (2011), OECD Factbook 2011-2012 Economic, Environmental and
Social Statistics, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/factbook-2011-en, (15.12.2012).
Owoye, O. (1995), “The Causal Relationship Between Taxes and
Expenditures in The G7 Countries: Cointegration and Error Correction
Models”, Applied Economics Letters, 2, 19-22.
Dökmen/Kamu Harcamaları…
142
Park, W. K. (1998), “Granger Causality Between Government Revenues
and Expenditures in Korea”, Journal of Economic Development, 23 (1), 145-55.
Payne, J. (1998), “The Tax-Spend Debate: Time Series Evidence from State
Budgets”, Public Choice, 95, 307-320.
Payne, J. E. (1998), “The Tax-spend Debate: Time Series Evidence from
State Budgets”, Public Choice, 95 (3-4), 307-320.
Pedroni, P. (1999), “Critical Values for Cointegration Test in
Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics
and Statistics, Special Issue, 653- 670.
Ram, R (1988), “Additional Evidence on Causality Between Government
Revenues and Government Expenditure”, Southern Economic Journal, 617–
628.
Saunoris J. W. ve J. E. Payne (2010), “Tax More or Spend Less?
Asymmetries in the UK Revenue-Expenditure Nexus”, Journal of Policy
Modeling, 32, 478–87.
Şen, Hüseyin, Sağbaş, İsa ve Keskin, Abdullah (2007), Bütçe Açıkları ve
Açık Finansman Politikası Teori ve Türkiye Uygulaması, Ankara: Orion
Yayınevi.
Tatoğlu Yerdelen, F. (2012), Panel Veri Ekonometrisi, İstanbul: Beta
Yayıncılık.
Terzi, H. ve S. Oltulular (2006), “Harcama-Vergi Geliri Hipotezi: Türkiye
Örnegi”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 20(2), 1-18.
Tüğen, K. (1997), Bütçe Açıkları ve Açığın Finansmanında İç
Borçlanmanın Rolü (1980 Sonrası Türkiye Deneyimi), İzmir: Bilim Ofset.
Vamvoukas, G.A. (2011), "The Tax-Spend Debate with An Application to
The EU”, Economic Issues, 16(1), 65-88, March.
Von Furstenberg, G. M., R. J. Green, ve J. Jeong (1985), “Have Taxes Led
Government Expenditures? The United States as A Test Case”, Journal of
Public Policy, 5 (3), 321-348.
Wahid, N.M. (2008), “An Empirical Investigation on the Nexus Between
Tax Revenue and Government Spending: The Case of Turkey”, International
Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 16, 46-51.
Yamak, R. ve Z. Abdioğlu (2012), “Ampirik Bağlamda Toplam ve Alt
Kalemler Bazında Kamu Harcamaları ve Kamu Gelirleri Arasındaki İlişki:
Türkiye Örneği”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 30 (1), 173-193.
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,
Cilt:27, Sayı:2, Yıl:2012, ss.115-143.
143
Young, A. (2009), "Tax-Spend or Fiscal Illusion?" Cato Journal 29, 3.
Zapf, M. ve J. E. Payne (2009), “Asymmetric Modeling of the Revenue-
Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from Aggregate State and Local Government in
the US”, Applied Economics Letters, 16, 871–876.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com