You are here

Promising an Alternative Path: Analyzing Students’ Attitudes towards Comparative Literature Studies

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (Original Language): 
In the twenty first century world everything changes so quickly and education systems have also been affected by such rapid change. As a result of the parallelism to the changes, globalism and cultural studies have gained significance within the field of education. For novice teachers in particular, having cultural awareness and a point of view about what has been happening around the world are significant factors for becoming a well-equipped teacher. In relation to this, comparative literature studies may be a means to assist novice teachers to gain both cultural and social awareness. As a result of its nature, comparative literature studies trigger the study of sociology, psychology, political sciences and cultural studies and may therefore help students’ both linguistic and sociological development. In order to analyze students’ attitudes towards comparative literature studies a six question survey was given to ELT students at Dokuz Eylül University. As a result of the findings it becomes patent that although students appreciate literature courses, they would also prefer to engage in different course content. In addition, according to the survey, students underline the fact that grammar study alone is insufficient for becoming a teacher; they also need to be aware of their own and other cultures. In relation to the above, there is a significant need for studying both Turkish literature and comparative studies within the Turkish education system.
52
61

REFERENCES

References: 

Aydın, K. (2008). Karşılaştırmalı Edebiyat. Günümüz Postmodern Bağlamında Algılanışı. İstanbul: Birey.
Bassnett, S (1998). Comparative Literature. A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bennett, C. (1999). Comprehensive Multicultural Education.(Fifth Ed.) Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bülbül, M.(2008). Seçme Öyküler ve Karşılaştırmalı Öykü Çözümlemeleri. Konya: Çizgi.
Enginün, İ. (1999). Mukayeseli Edebiyat, İstanbul.
2013, Dil ve Edebiyat Eğitimi Dergisi, 8, 52-61.
2013, Journal of Language and Literature Education, 8, 52-61.
60
Erkman, F. ve Yıldız C.(1999). Türkiye Üniversitelerinin Almanca Bölümlerinde Ypılan Çalışmaların Bibliografyası, Marmara Üniversitesi Yay:650, Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Yay:33, İstanbul.
İlkhan, İ. (2003). “Karşılaştırmalı Edebiyat Çalışmaları ve Sonrası, I. Uluslararası Karşılaştırmalı Edebiyat Kongresi, Eskişehir.
Karaismailoğlu, A.(2002). “Karşılaştırmalı Edebiyat Araştırmaları Açısından Klasik Türk Edebiyatı ile İran Edebiyatı”, I. Ulusal Karşılaştırmalı Edebiyat Sempozyumu, Eskişehir.
Özmen, K. (2007). Türk Karşılaştırmacılığına Bir Giriş Denemesi, VI. Uluslararası Dil, Yazın, Deyişbilim Sempozyumu, Isparta.
Tekşan, M. (2011). Karşılaştırmalı Edebiyat Bilimi. İstanbul: Kriter.
Tiedt, P. & Tiedt I. (2002). Multicultural Teaching. A Handbook of Activities, Information, and Resources.(Sixth Ed.). Allyn and Bacon (Eds), Boston.
Sakallı, C. (2006). Karşılaştırmalı Yazınbilim ve Yazınlararasılık / Sanatlararasılık Üzerine, Ankara.
Wellek, R. (1948) Comparative Literature in General Education. Vol. 2, No.3, pp. 215-218.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com