You are here

Home » Content

Bilgi Kaynaklarının Değerlendirilmesi

Evaluating Information Resources

Journal Name:

  • Bilgi Dünyası

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Librarians have traditionally been familiar with the techniques of critically analysing the value of individual books and periodicals. This has been necessary for a variety of reasons: to order appropriate titles for the library collections; to include items in bibliographies; and to recommend titles to readers and scholars. With the advent of the Internet and its subsequent use as a research tool, the evaluation of Internet sites has become increasingly important. Since pages can be posted on the Internet without any editorial review or approval, it is vitally important for users to know how to appraise these information resources. This article presents a brief overview of ways to make these evaluations.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Genelde kütüphaneciler kitap ve süreli yayınlara ilişkin değerlerin eleştirel analizine ilişkin teknikleri bilirler. Çünkü koleksiyona uygun yayınlar sipariş edebilmek, bibliyografyalara künye eklemek, normal okuyucu ve akademisyenlere eser tavsiye edebilmek gibi birçok neden, bunları öğrenmelerini gerektirmiştir. İnternetin bulunuşu ve bir araştırma aracı olarak kullanılması ile birlikte internet sitelerinin değerlendirilmeleri gittikçe artan bir şekilde önem kazanmıştır. İnternete sayfalar hiç bir editör incelemesi veya kabulünden geçmek¬sizin gönderilebildiğine göre kullanıcıların bu bilgiyi nasıl değerlendire¬bileceklerini bilmesi yaşamsal öneme sahiptir. Bu makale, böylesine değerlendirmelerin yapılabilme yollarından kısaca bahsetmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-bilgi-kaynaklarinin-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 1
98-105
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Brant, D.S. (2005). Purdue University Libraries. Retrived 18 March 2005 from http://www.lib.purdue.edu/itd/techman/eval.html databese.
University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Mclntyre Library. (2005). Retrived 18 March 2005 from
http://www.uwec.edu/library/Guides/tencs.html databese.
University Libraries, University of Houston (1987). Article from the public-access computer systems review. Retrived 18 March 2005 from http://info.lib.uh.edu/pr/v8/n3/smit8n3.html databese.
Illinios State University, Milner Library. (2005). Retrived 18 March 2005 from http://www.mlb.ilstu.edu/ressubj/subject/intrnt/evaluate.htm databese.
University of California, Berkeley Library. ((2005). Retrived 18 March 2005 from http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/ TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/ Evaluate.html databese.
New Mexico State University Library. (2005). Retrived 18 March 2005 from http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/evalcrit.html databese.
SUNY- Albany. University Library (2005). Retrived 18 March 2005 from http://library.albany.edu/internet/evaluate.html databese.
Johns Hopkins University Library. (2005). Retrived 18 March 2005 from http://www.library.jhu.edu/researchhelp/general/evaluating/ databese.
Binghamton University Libraries. (2005). Retrived 18 March 2005 from http://library.lib.binghamton.edu/search/evaluation.html databese.
Purdue University Libraries. (2005). Retrived 18 March 2005 from http://www.lib.purdue.edu/ugrl/staff/sharkey/interneteval/ databese.
Georgetown University Library. (2005) Retrived 18 March 2005 from http://www.library.georgetown.edu/internet/eval.htm databese.
Virginia Technical University Libraries. (2005). Retrived 18 March 2005 from http://www.lib.vt.edu/help/instruct/evaluate/evalbiblio.html databese.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com