You are here

Home » Content

KONVANSİYONEL VE DİGİTAL BİTE-WİNG RADYOGRAMLAR ÜZERİNDE ÖLÇÜLEN ALVEOL KEMİK YÜKSEKLİK DEĞERLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

THE COMPARISON OF ALVEOL BONE LEVEL VALUES MEASURED ON CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL BITE-WING RADIOGRAPHS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Conventional bitewing intraoral radiographs are commonly used to detect alveolar bone loss associated with periodontal disease. Over the past few years, systems that can generate radiographic digital images without the need for radiograph film have become available for use in clinical practice. In this study, in which two methods are compared, totally measurements of 634 sites including mesial and distal regions of 1st. and 2 nd. premolar and 1st. molar teeth were taken through conventional and digital bite-wing radiograms taken from totally 103 patients. As a result of the analysis, the findings were found to be very significant (t= 3,90 and p<0,0001) for the distal of 1st. premolar tooth, and significant (t= 3,39 and p<0,001) for the distal and mesial of the 2nd. premolar when their mean were considered. In contrast, no significant difference was observed in the mesial and distal of 1st. molar tooth from the point of averages (p>0,005). These findings are supported that no comparable the use of digital radiographs and conventional radiographs in evaluation of alveolar bone loss.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Konvansiyonel bite-wing intra-oral radyogramlar periodontal hastalıklarla ilgili alveol kemik kaybını tespit etmek için yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Son birkaç yıl içinde, radyografik filmlere ihtiyaç duyulmayan dijital görüntüler üretebilen sistemler klinik uygulamalarda kullanılmaktadır. İki yöntemin karşılaştırıldığı bu çalışmada toplam 103 bireyden alınan konvansiyonel ve dijital bite-wing radyogramlarda 1. ve 2. premolar ile 1. molar dişlerin mesial ve distal bölgelerini kapsayan 634 bölgeden ölçümler yapıldı. Yapılan analizler sonucu 1. premolar dişin distalinde (t= 3,90 ve p<0,0001) ve 2. premolar dişin meziali ve distalinde (t= 3,39 ve p<0,001) ortalama olarak anlamlı sonuçlar bulundu. Buna karşın 1. molar dişin mezialinde ve distalinde anlamlı farklılık tespit edilemedi (p>0,005). Bu bulgular, alveoler kemik kaybını değerlendirmede intraoral dijital radyografilerin kullanımı ile konvansiyonel radyografik filmlerin kullanımının kıyaslanabilir olmadığını desteklemektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-konvansiyonel-digital-bite-wing-radyogramlar-uzerinde-olculen-alveol-kemik-yukseklik-degerlerinin-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 2
68-71
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1-
2-
3-
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
9-
10-
Lang NP, Hill RW. Radiographs in periodonrics. J
Clin Periodontol 1977;4:16-28
Pecoraro ML ,azadivatan-le N, Janal M, Khocht A.
Comparison of observer reliability in assessing
alveolar bone height on direct digital and
conventional radiographs. Dentomaxillofacial
Radiology 2005;34:279-284
Harorlı B, Akgül HM, Dağistan S. Dişhekimliği
Radyolojisi. Erzurum 2006: 240-241
Khocht A, Janal M, Harasty L, Cang KM.
Comparison of direct digital and conventional
intraoral radiographs in detecting alveolar bone
loss. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1468-1475
Miles DA, Langlais LP, Parks ET. Digital X-ray are
here: why aren't you using them? J Calif Dent
assoc 1999;27(12):926-934
Miles DA, Razzano MR. The future of digital
imaging in dentistry. Dent Ciln North Am 2000;
44(2):427-438
Sanderink GC, Miles DA. Intraoral detectors: CCD, CMOS, TFT and other devices. Dent Ciln North Am 2000; 44(2):249-255
Hausmann E, Allen K, Dunford R, Christersson L. A reliable computerized method to determine the level of the radiographic alveolar crest. Journal of Periodontal Research 1989;24:368-369 Hildebolt CF, Pilgram TK, Yokoyama-Crothers N, et al. Reliability of linear alveolar bone loss measurements of mandibular posterior teeth from digitized bitewing radiographs. J Clin Periodontol 1998; 25(11):850-856
Eikenberg S, Dolley G. Detection of interproximal caries using methods applicaple to a field environment: digital radiography, manually processed film, and self-developing film. Mil Med 2001;166(4):338-341
11- Price C, Ergul N. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 1997;34(1):45-52
12- Kaeppler G, Vogel A and Axmann-Krcmar D.Intraoral storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the assessment of alveolar bone structures. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2000;29:
362-367

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com