You are here

Home » Content

SÜT AZI DİŞLERİNDE ÇURUK UZAKLAŞTIRMA YÖNTEMLERİNİN MİKROSIZINTI ÜZERİNE ETKÎSİ

THE EFFECT OF CARIES REMOVAL METHODS ON MJCROLEAKAGE IN THE PRIMARY MOLAR TEETH

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2002

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of our study is Lhu removal of caries dentine by the use of different methods in primary molar teeth and the in vitro evaluation of the microlcakage of restorations of teeth with ormocer (Definite) material. In our study, 3 groups were formed, each of which included 8 samples. For the removal of the caries dentine tissue from teeth the conventional method (micromotor), mechanical method (excavation with hand) and chemo-mechanical (Carisolv) method were used. The restorations of teeth with prepared cavities were carried out with Delimle and completed with Sof-Lcx polishing discs. Then thermocyded between 5°C and 55yC was applied 200 limes and teeth were placed in %0j basic-fEiehsion dye for 24 hours to evaluate the microleakage, Mieralcakagc scores were determined by taking the sections in the diıection of mesio-distal from the Leeth placed otu the dye. Kniskal Wallis and Mann-WhiLnev U tests were applied to die obtained data. As a result of Kniskal Wallis variance analysis the differences between the groups were found Lo be statistically significant (P<0.05). As a result of Mann-Whitney U lest, the difference beLween the Conventional method group and Carisolv group was found lo be statistically significant (1^0.05) whereas the differences between the conventional method and the mechanical method, and between the mechanical method and chemo-mcchanical method were nut significant (P>0.05)
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çalışmamızm amacı, süt azı dişlerinde farklı yöntemler kullanılarak çürük deminin uzaklaştırılması ve dişlerin ormocer (Eiefinite) restoratif materyal ile restorasyonlarının mikmsı/jnlıfarjnın in vitro olarak değerlendirilmesidir. Çalışmamızda, her biri 8'er örnek içeren 3 grup oluşturulmuştur. Dişlerdeki çiirük dentin dokusunun uzaklaştırılmasında geleneksel yöntem (mikromotor), mekanik yöntem (el ile ekskavasyon) ve kimyasal-mekanik yöntem (Cari'iolv) kullanılmıştır. Kavitcicri hazırlanan dişlerin restorasyonları Definite iie yapılmış ve Sof-Lex cila diskleri kullanılarak işlem bitirilmiştir. Daha sonra, 5"C-55°C arasında 200 defa termal siklus uygulanmıştır. Takiben, dişler mikrosızmtımn değerlendirilmesi için %0,5'lik ba-zik-fuksin boyasında 24 saat tutulmuşlardır. Boyadan çıkarılan dişlerden mesio-distal yönde kesifler alınarak mik-rosızmtt derecelendirmesi yapılmıştır. Elde edilen verilere Kruskal Wallis ve Mann-Whitney U testleri uygulanmıştır. Kruskal Wallis variyans analizi sonucunda gruplar drasmdaki farklılık istatistiksel olarak önemli bulunmuştur (l'<0,05). Mann-Whitney U testi sonucunda ise. Geleneksel yöntem grubu ile Cari>iulv grubu arasındaki farklılık istatistiksel olarak önemli (P<0,05) iken, Geleneksel yöntem ile Mekanik yöntem ve Mekanik yöntem ile Kimyasal-mekanik yöntemler arasındaki farklılıkların ise önemsiz olduğu bulunmuştur (P>0,05)
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-sut-azi-dislerinde-curuk-uzaklastirma-yontemlerinin-mikrosizinti-uzerine-etkisi.pdf
  • 3
22-28
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. AgtLStini FCJ, Koîidcn C\ Powurs JM. Bond Strength of Self-Etching Primers To F.Tiamd and Dentin of Primary teeth. Pediat Dent 200I;G:23.2. Banerjee A, Kidd BAM, Watson TK Scanning Electron Microscopic Observations ol" Humarı Dentine After Mechanical Caries Excavation. .1 Dem 2000;2& 179-1 86.
3. Dammaschke T, Stratmann U, Mokrys K, Kaup M. Ott KHR. Reaction of Sound and Demmeralised Denline To Carisolv In Vivo and In Vitro. J Dent 2002;30:59-65.
4. FusavamaT.Two Layers of Carious Dentin: Dlag-nosı s and Treatment. Opcr Dent 1979:4:63-70.
5. Goldman M,
Kronma
n JH. A Preliminary Report On A Chemomechanjcal Means of Removing Canes. IADA 1976;93:1149-1153.
6. I laak R, FnU LB, Fabcr FJ, Noack MJ. Influence of Chemomechatiic&l Caries Removal On Dentin Bonding. J Dent Res 1999;78:369 (#21II).
7. Knbib CM, Kronman J, Goldman M, A Chemical Evaluation of Collagen and Hydroxyprolinc After Treatment With GK-mi. Pharm 'I'her Dent 1975:2:209-21 5.
8. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R,.'l yas M, Anusavicc K. New Restorative Materials. Int Dent .1 1998;48:3-16.
9. Kidd EAM, Joyston-Beehal S, Beighton D. Microbiological Validation of Assesments of Caries Activity During Cavity Preparation. Caries Res 1993;27:402-408.
10. Kwong SM, Cheung GSP, Kei I i I. Itthogarun A, Smales KJ, 'lay Hi, Pashley DM. Micro-Tensile Bond Strengths To Sclerotic Denlin Using A Sell Etching and A Total-Etching Technique. Dent Mater 2002;18:359-369.
11. Lambrcchts P, van Meerbeek B, Perdigao .1, Van-herle G. Adhesives: Dos and Donfls. In: Roulet JF, De-grange M eel. Adhesion The Silent Revocation in Dentistry. Germany: Quintessence Pub. 2000: 45-60.
12. Nftfcabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of Dental Hard Tissues. Tokyo, Quintessence Publishing Co, 1998:17-20.
13. Nikaido'f, Nokajima M, HigashiT, Kaneinura N, Pereira PNR,Tagami .1. Shar Bond Strengths of A Single-Step Bonding System To Enamel and Dentin. Dent Mater 1997;16:40-47.
14. Nguyen T, Dohcrty EH. Aboushala. A, Kugcl G, Perry R. hITeel of Chcmomechanicstl Caries Removal System On Mikroleakage of (Composite Resin' Restorations. IADR/AADR/CADR 80th Genera Session [March 6-9, 2002 (#310)].
15. Pashley JJH, Pashley EL, Carvalho RM, Tay FR. '1'he Hlfeets of Dentin Permeability On Restorative Dentistry. Dent Clin N Am 2002:46:21 1-245
16. Relief DH, Mnrıdros RS, Russell CM. Relationship Between Shear Bond Strength and Quantitative Micro-leakage. J Dnit Res 1992;7I:6f5( Abstract No:799).
17. Schut7bai)k SG, Galaini J, A Comparative In Vitro Study of GK-I0I and GK-101E In Caries Removal. J Dent Res 1978:57:861-864.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com