Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

POST KEYNESGĠL OKUL: OLUġUMU VE TEMEL ÖZELLĠKLERĠ

The Emergence and The Basis Of Post Keynesian School

Journal Name:

  • Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The basis of Post Keynesian school that became strong more and more in the 1980s goes as far as Neo Classical Synthesis that reconciled the Keynesians and Neo Classical economists in the begin of 1950s. The most important base of Post Keynesian view is; economies wouldn’t come to full employment equilibrium automatically even in the long run and the general situation is less-than-full-employment equilibrium. Post Keynesian economists aren’t homogeneous group but all of them combine with around the principles that disequilibrium, Keynesian uncertainty, unstable investment function, the important of Money and contracts, endogenous money supply, the important of economic and political institutions and distribution of wealth, historical time. All of Post Keynesians believe that government intervention to economy is necessary both in the long run and in the short run. There are some groups have different view about the effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policies in Post Keynesian school. Hyman Minsky and Paul Davidson believe that unemployment can reduced by using only monetary policies, but according to Nicholas Kaldor and Basil Moore unemployment can't reduced by this way. Post Keynesians agree that fiscal policies are effective over income distribution but this policies area inadequate. So they recommend income policies with traditional fiscal and monetary policies.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
1980‟lerden itibaren giderek güçlenen Post Keynesgil okulun temelleri, 1950‟lerin başında Keynesgil ve Neo Klasik iktisatçıları uzlaşma noktasına götüren Neo Klasik Sentez‟e kadar uzanır. Post Keynesgil okulun dayandığı temel nokta; ekonomilerin uzun dönemde dahi kendiliğinden tam istihdam dengesine ulaşamayacağı, genel durumun eksik istihdam dengesi olduğu fikridir. Post Keynesgiller homojen bir grup olmamakla birlikte tümü dengesizlik, Keynesgil belirsizlik, istikrarsız yatırım fonksiyonu, paranın ve sözleşmelerin önemi, para arzının endojenliği, ekonomik ve politik kurumların, gelir dağılımının önemi ilkeleri etrafında birleşirler ve devletin hem kısa hem de uzun dönemde ekonomiye müdahalesinin gerekli olduğuna inanırlar. Post Keynesgil grup içinde para ve maliye politikalarının etkimliği konusunda farklı görüşlere sahip gruplar mevcuttur. Nicholas Kaldor ve Basil Moore gibi bazıları işsizliğin tek başına para politikası ile azaltılamayacağına inanırlarken, Hyman Minsky ve Paul Davidson ise para politikasını işsizliği azaltmanın etkin bir aracı olarak görürler. Maliye politikasının gelir bölüşümünü etkileme açısından etkin, ancak yetersiz olduğunu kabul ederler, geleneksel para ve maliye politikları yanında gelirler politikasını da önerirler.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-post-keynesggl-okul-olugumu-temel-ozellgklerg.pdf
  • 2
31
39
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Arestis, Philip (Winter 1987/1988), „The Credit Segment of a UK Post Keynesian
Model‟, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 10(2).
Crotty, J. R.(1980), „Post Keynesian Economic Theory: An Overview and
Evaluation‟, American Economic Review, 70.
Davidson, Paul (1991), „The Role of Contracts and Money in Theory and the Real
World‟. Paul Davidson, Controversies in Post Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar
Publishing.
Davidson, Paul (1978), Money and Real World, London:Macmillan.
Eicher, A. S., Kregel, J. A. (1975), „An Essay on Post Keynesian Theory: A New
Paradigm in Economics‟, Journal of Economic Literatüre, 13.
Gram, H. & Walsh, V. (1983), „Joan Robinson‟s Economics in Retrospect‟, Journal
of Economic Literature, 21.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Akademik AraĢtırmalar ve ÇalıĢmalar Dergisi / Journal of Academic Researches and Studies
Prof.Dr. Alaeddin YAVAġÇA Özel Sayısı - Haziran 2010 / The Special Edition of Prof.Dr. Alaeddin YAVAġÇA - June 2010
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
39
Harcourt, G. C. (1988), Post Keynesian Economics, Macmillan Press.
Hicks, J. R.(1980), „ISLM-An Explanations‟, Journal of Post Keynesian
Economics.
Kalecki, M. (1971), Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy,
Cambridge University Pres.
Lavoie, M. (1984), „The Endogenous Flow of Credit and Post Keynesian Theory of
Money‟, Journal of Economics Issues.
Robinson Joan,(1962) „Review of H. G. Johnson, Money, Trade and Economic
Growth‟, Economic Journal.
Robinson, Joan (1973), „What Has Become of the Keynesian Revolution ?‟. Joan
Robinson, After Keynes, New York.
Robinson, Joan (1980), Collected Economic Papers, Boston:MIT Press.
Sicsu, Joao (2001), „Credible Monetary Policy: A Post Keynesian Approach‟,
Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 23(4).
Snowdon, Brian & Vane, Howard & Wynarczyk, Peter (1996), A Modern Guide to
Macroeconomics, Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing.
Tarshis, L. (1980), „Post Keynesian Economics: A Promise That Bounced‟,
American Economic Review, 70(2).
Tobin, James (1974), Milton Friedman‟s Monetary Framework: A Debate With His
Critics, Chicago University Press.
Turner, Marjorie S.(1989), Joan Robinson and the Americans, New York:M. E.
Sharpe Press.
Williams, Edward E. & Findlay M. Chapman (1986), „Risk and the Role of Failed
Expectations in an Uncertain World‟, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 9(1).
Yellen, J. L (1980), „On Keynesian Economics and The Economics of Post
Keynesians‟, American Economic Review, 70(2).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com