Buradasınız

Osmanlı Hıristiyan Vakıf Belgerinde Tercüme ve Sahtecilik

Forgeries and Translations of Ottoman Christian K/^Documents

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The Ottoman zimmi donations for the benefit of their religious institutions are a thorny issue in Islamic/ottoman jurisprudence. Ottoman muftis following the founders of the Hanafi madhab employed istihsan to address the problem of validity of zimmi vakfs and their inalienability. Molla Khusrev allowed Christian foundations to operate and favored the lenient opinion of Abu Hanifa vis-â-vis Christian vakfs. He however did not manage to solve the problem of inalienability until Ebussuud Efendi categorized church vakfs as family vakfs (vakf khurri). The forgeries of the confiscation firman of Selim II found in Athonite monasteries are written in Ottoman and Greek and date from the 17th and 18th centuries. Despite the accommodation ottoman law provided to monastic institutions, the exploitation of their properties and the need to remain unchallenged actors in their local communities lie behind the forgeries' creation. The degree of success when presented in the ottoman judicial system though varies according to the case.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Osmanlı zimmîlerinin kendi dini kurumları için yaptıkları bağışlar, Osmanlı-lslam hukukunun çetrefil bir konusudur. Hanefi mezhebinin kurucularını takip eden Osmanlı uleması zimmî vakıfların geçerliliği ve dokunulmazlığı sorununu çözmek için istihsan kavramını kullandılar. Molla Hüsrev, Hıristiyan vakıfların varlıklarını sürdürmesine müsamaha gösterirken Ebu Hanife'nin aynı konu hakkındaki görüşünü benimsedi. Ancak, kilise vakıflarının devredilemezliği konusu, meseleyi aile vakfı (Zürri vakıf) sınıfına sokan Ebussud'a kadar çözülemedi. II. Selim'e ait müsadere fermanının 17 ve 18. yüzyılada yazılmış Osmanlıca ve Yunanca sahteleri, Aynaroz Manastırı'nda bulunmaktadır. Osmanlı hukukunun Hıristiyan kurumlarına sağladığı düzenlemeye rağmen, bu türden sahte belge üretiminin gerisinde, manastırların kendi mülklerini sorunsuz işletme ve yörelerindeki halkın gözünde tartışılmaz aktörler olarak var olma isteği yer almaktaydı. Sahtecilik olayı Osmanlı yargı sistemine taşındığında ise başarı derecesi duruma göre değişmektedir.
161
172

REFERENCES

References: 

Alexander, J. (1997). The Lord Giveth and the Lord Taketh Away: Athos and the Confiscation Affair of 1568-1569.
Mount Athos in the 14th -16th centuries, (pp. 149-200). Athens: Athonika Symmeikta.
Chrysochoidis, K. (2011). Manuscript collection on ecclesiastical history in Gennadeios (in Greek). M. Politi, E. Pappa (Eds.). Explorations in the manuscripts of Gennadeios Library. (59-66). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Demetriades, V. (1997). Athonite Documents and the Ottoman Occupation, Mount Athos in the 14th-16'h Centuries, Mount Athos in the 14th -16th centuries. (41-67). Athens: Athonika Symmeikta.
Fotic, A. (1994). The Official Explanations for the Confiscation of Monasteries (Churches) and their estates at the time ofSelim II, Turcica 26: 33-54.
Fotic, A. (2000). Mount Athos and Hilandar in the Ottoman Empire (15-17th Centuries), (in Serbian). Belgrade: Institute for Balkan Studies.
Heyd, U. (1973). Studies in Old Ottoman CriminalLaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Imber, C. (1997). Ebu 's-su'ud: ThelslamicLegalTradition. Stanford: StanfordUniversityPress.
Inalcik, H. (2012). The Survey of Istanbul 1455: The text, English translation, analysis of the text, documents. Istanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları.
Oikonomides, N. (1976). Monasteres etmoines lors de laconquete ottoman. Siidost-Forschungen. 35:1-10.
Kermeli, E. (1997). Ebu's-su'ud's Definitions of Church vakfs: Theory and Practice in Ottoman
Law. R. Gleave, E. Kermeli (Eds.) IslamicLaw: Theory andPractice. (141-157) London: I.B.Tauris.
Kermeli, E. (2002). Vakfs consisting of shares in ships: Hilccets from the Saint John the Theologos Monastery on Patmos. E. Zachariadou (Ed.). The Kapudan Pasha : His Office and his Domain. (213-220). Crete: Crete University Press.
Kermeli, E. (2008). Central administration versus provincial arbitrary governance: Patmos and Mount Athos monasteries inthe 16th century. 'Byzantine andModern GreekStudies 32: 2, 189-202.
Kermeli, E. (2013).
Erke
n Dönem Osmanlı Hukuku ve Gayri Müslimler. T. Yücedoğru, O.Ş.
Koloğlu, U.M. Kılavuz, K. Gömbeyaz (eds.) UluslararasıMollaHüsrevSempozyumu. 18-20Kasım 2011 Bursa) -Bildiriler- (431-447). Bursa: Bursa Büyükşehir Belediyesi Yayınları.
Kolovos, I. (2000). Peasants andMonks in Ottoman Chalkidiki 15'h -lâh centuries (in Greek). Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. V.l-3. University of Thessaloniki. Thessaloniki.
Kolovos, I. (2013). The monks and the Sultan outside the newly conquered ottoman Salonica. Festschrift in honor ofHeathLowry. Journal ofTurkish Studies, 40:271-279.
Kotzageorgis, Ph. (2000). The Athonite Monastery of Saint Pavlos during the Ottoman Period (in Greek). Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.
Kotzageorgis, Ph. (2004). The vakufname ofMare Brankovic. Hilandarski Zbornik. 11: 307-323.
Lemerle, P., Wittek, (1947). Recherches sur l'histoire et le statut des monasteries athonites sous la domination
turque. Archives d'histoire du droit oriental, 3: 411-472.
Messick, B. (1989). Just Writing: Paradox and Political Economy in Yemeni Legal Documents. Cultural Anthropology, 4, 1, pp. 26-50.
Papazoglou, G. (1987). Translated Turkish Documents of the Orfani Metohi of the Dionysiou Monastery of Mount Athos (1535-1733). Kavala: Kavala Municipality.
Smyrlis, K. (2011). The monasteries in Late Byzantium: their economic role and relations to the state (13th -15th centuries) [in Greek]. I. Kolovos (Ed.). Monasteries, Economy and Politics: From the Medieval to the Modern times. (53-69). Crete: Crete University Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com