The Concept of Creativity in Art and in Science: Are Autistic People Creative?

American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders (4th ed.). Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.
Armstrong, T. (2011). The Power of Neurodiversity: Unleashing the Advantages of Your
Differently Wired Brain. Cambridge, MA: DaCapo Lifelong/Perseus Books.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social
cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the Enigma. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of Natural Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-
Hall, Inc.
Inglis, M. & Simpson, A. (2006). Characterising mathematical reasoning: Studies with the
Wason Selection Task. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of
the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1768-1777). Sant
Feliu de Guíxols, Spain.
Jones-Gotman, M. & Milner, B. (1977). Design fluency: The invention of nonsense
drawings after focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychologia, 15, 653-674.
Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217-250.
López Astorga, M. (2010a). Neurodiversidad y razonamiento lógico. La necesidad de una
nueva perspectiva en las investigaciones sobre el autismo [Neurodiversity and
logical reasoning. The need for a new perspective on the researches about autism].
Revista de Educación Inclusiva, 3(2), 97-111.
López Astorga, M. (2010b). ¿Puede un profesor desarrollar de modo lógico y sistemático
capacidades creativas? Un análisis filosófico del problema de la creatividad [Can a
teacher develop creative abilities in a logical and systematic way? A philosophical
analysis of the problem of creativity]. Intersecciones Educativas, 2, 95-107.
López Astorga, M. (2011a). La falacia de la conjunción y la contextualización en el autismo
[The conjunction fallacy and the contextualization in autism]. Estudios Pedagógicos,
37(1), 279-291.
López Astorga, M. (2011b). Razonamiento contrafactual y conocimiento general: la
primacía de la estructura formal abstracta en el autismo [Counterfactual reasoning
and general knowledge: the primacy of abstract formal structure in autism]. Revista
de Educación Inclusiva, 4(2), 123-136.
Low, J., Goddard, E., & Melser, J. (2009). Generativity and imagination in autism spectrum
disorder: evidence from individual differences in children´s impossible entity
drawings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 425-444.
66 Miguel López Astorga
Lui, M.-J., Shih, W.-L., Ma, L.-Y. (2011). Are children with Asperger Syndrome creative
in divergent thinking and feeling? A brief report. Research in Autism Spectrum
Disorders, 5, 294-298.
McKenzie, R. (2011, July). A different way to think about creativity: The case of autism
and outsider art. Paper presented at the Seventh Global Conference of the project
Creative Engagements: Thinking with Children, Oxford, UK. Retrieved from
http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/rmckenzie.pdf
McKenzie, R., Evans, J. St. B. T., & Handley, S. J. (2010). Conditional reasoning in
autism: activation and integration of knowledge and belief. Developmental
Psychology, 46(2), 391-403.
McKenzie, R., Evans, J. St. B. T., & Handley, S. J. (2011). Autism and performance on the
suppression task: reasoning, context and complexity. Thinking and Reasoning,
17(2), 182-196.
Morsanyi, K., Handley, S. J., & Evans J. St. B. T. (2009). Heuristics and biases in autism:
Less biased but not more logical. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 75-
80). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Reyna, V. F. (2004). How people make decisions that involve risk: a dual-process
approach. Current Directions in Psychology Science, 13, 60-66.
Rosenthal, A., Demers, S. T., Stilwell, W., Graybeal, S., & Zins, J. (1983). Comparison of
interrater reliability on the Torrance tests of creative thinking for gifted and
nongifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 20(1), 25-30.
Scott, F. J., Baron-Cohen, S., & Leslie, A. (1999). “If pigs could fly”: A test of
counterfactual reasoning and pretence in children with autism. British Journal of
Developmental Psychology, 17, 349-362.
Sinclai, W. J. (1909). Semmelweis: His Life and His Doctrine. Manchester, UK:
Manchester University Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning.
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K. E. (2004). The Robot´s Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin.
Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (2012). On the distinction between rationality and intelligence for
understanding individual differences in reasoning. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison
(Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 343-365). New York,
NY: Oxford University Press.
Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for
the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-665.
Stenning, K. & Van Lambalgen, M. (2008). Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science.
Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press.
Thévoz, M. (1994). An anti-museum: The collection de l´Art Brut in Lausanne (Trans.
Roger Cardinal). In M. D. Hall and E. W. Metcalf, Jr (Eds.), The Artist Outsider:
Creativity and the Boundaries of Culture (p. 63). Washington D.C.: Smithsonian
Institution Press.
The Concept of Creativity in Art and in Science: Are Autistic People Creative? 67
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The
conjunction fallacy in probability judgement. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315.
Williams, F. E. (1993). The cognitive affective interaction model for enriching gifted
programs. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and Models for Developing Programs for
the Gifted and Talented (pp. 461-484). Highett VIC, Australia: Hawker Brownlow.
World Health Organization (1993). International Classification of Diseases (10th ed.).
Geneve, Switzerland: World Health Organization.