Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

SEÇİLMİŞ OECD ÜLKELERİNDE KÜLTÜREL KAMU HARCAMALARININ SOSYO-EKONOMİK BELİRLEYENLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ANALİZ

AN ANALYSIS OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DETERMINANTS OF PUBLIC CULTURAL EXPENDITURES IN SELECTED OECD COUNTRIES

Journal Name:

  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Culture, considered as a society identity, is an important element to improve social unity. Besides, cultural activities and services are common need for individuals. Therefore this kind of services provided by government effects the social welfare positively. Public cultural spending is determined by economic, demographic, social and politic factors. This paper examines the effects of these factors on cultural spending for 9 OECD countries by using annual data over 1990-2009 period. We test stationary features of data using Panel LM (Lagrange Multiplier) unit root test which determines the structural breaks endogenously. Then by employing panel data techniques it was found that cultural spending is negatively correlated with per capita income growth and positively correlated with population growth, young population, unemployment and the measure of left-wing party dominance in the parliament. Furthermore we conclude that demographic factors are much more effective on cultural spending then other factors relatively.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bir toplumun kimliği niteliğindeki kültür toplumsal birliğin geliştirilmesinde önemli bir unsurdur. Ayrıca kültürel faaliyetler ve hizmetler bireylerin ortak bir ihtiyacıdır. Dolayısıyla bu tür hizmetlerin devlet tarafından sunulması toplumsal refahı olumlu yönde etkiler. Devletin yaptığı kültür harcamalarını ekonomik, demografik, sosyal ve politik faktörler belirlemektedir. Çalışmada bu faktörlerin kültürel harcamalar üzerindeki etkisi 9 OECD ülkesinin 1990-2009 yılları arasındaki yıllık verisi ile incelenmiştir. Verinin durağanlığı yapısal kırılmaların içsel olarak belirlendiği Panel LM (Lagrange Multiplier) birim kök testi ile yapılmıştır. Daha sonra panel veri analizi tekniği yapılmış ve kültürel harcamalar ile kişi başına gelir artışı ile negatif; nüfus artış hızı, genç nüfusun payı, işsizlik ve mecliste sol partilerin ağırlığını gösteren değişken ile pozitif ilişkili olduğu bulunmuştur. Bununla birlikte demografik faktörlerin diğer faktörlere göre kültür harcamalarını daha fazla etkilediği sonucu ortaya çıkmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-secilmis-oecd-ulkelerinde-kulturel-kamu-harcamalarinin-sosyo-ekonomik-belirleyenleri-uzerine-bir-analiz.pdf
  • 3
349
374
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Aktan, C.C. ve Vural, İ.Y. (2003). Gelir dağılımında adaletsizlik ve gelir
eşitsizliği. Ankara: Hak-İş Konfederasyonu Yayınları.
Aysu A. ve Dökmen G. (2011). An investigation on the relationship
between government size and unemployment rate: evidence from OECD countries.
Sosyo Ekonomi Dergisi, (2): 179–190.
Baltagi, B. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data. Third Edition.
England: John Wiley and Sons Press.
Başar, S., Aksu, H., Temurlenk, M. S. ve Polat, Ö. (2009). Türkiye’de
kamu harcamaları ve büyüme ilişkisi: sınır testi yaklaşımı. Atatürk Üniversitesi
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi,13 (1): 301–314.
Benito B., Vicente C., Bastida F. ve Guiilamon D. (2012). Municipal
elections and cultural expenditure authors.
http://www.feb.ugent.be/accoeco/Papers_Cigar2011/83.%20Municipal%20election
s%20and%20cultural%20expenditure.pdf (06.06.2012).
Bodo, C. ve Bodo, S. (2011). Country profile Italy.
www.culturalpolicies.net/web/profiles-download.php (06.06.2012).
Chen, J. (2008). A study on cultural tourism and South Korean
government. Senior Paper. Wenzao Ursuline College of Langauges Department of
International Affairs, South Korea.
Comperative Political Data Set (2012).
http://www.ipw.unibe.ch/content/team/klaus_armingeon/comparative_politic...
a_sets/index_ger.html (12.02.2012).
Cusack, T.R. (1997). Partisan politics and public finance: changes in public
spending in the industrialized democracies 1955–1989. Public Choice, 91 (3-4):
375-395.
Çeçen, A. (1985). Kültür yönetimi. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 16 (3): 113-126.
DiMaggio, P. ve Pettit, B. (1999). Public opinion and political
vulnerability: why has the national endowment for the arts been such an attractive
target. Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Princeton University.
DiMaggio, P. and Useem, M. (1978). Cultural democracy in a period of
cultural expansion: the social composition of arts audiences in the United States.
Social Problems, 26 (2): 180-197.
Duelund, P., Valtysson, B. ve Bohlbro, L. (2012). Country profile
Denmark. www.culturalpolicies.net/web/profiles-download.php (06.06.2012).
Seçilmiş OECD Ülkelerinde… DEU Journal of GSSS, Vol: 15, Issue: 3
369
European Parliament (2006). Financing the arts and culture in the
European Union. http://www.culturalpolicies.net/web/files/134/en/Financing_
the_Arts_and_Culture_in_the_EU.pdf (06.06.2012).
Feldmann, H. (2010). Government size an unemployment in developing
countries. Applied Economics Letters, (17): 289-292.
Fisher, R. ve Figueira, C. (2011). Country profile United Kingdom.
www.culturalpolicies.net/web/profiles-download.php (06.06.2012).
Fitzgibbon, M. (2011). Country profile Ireland.
www.culturalpolicies.net/web/profiles-download.php (06.06.2012).
Getzner, M. (2002). Determinants of public cultural expenditures: an
exploratory time series analysis for Austria. Journal of Cultural Economics, 26 (4):
287–306.
Getzner, M. (2004). Exploring voter preferences in cultural policy: a case
study for Austria. Empirica, 31 (1): 27-42.
Gökalp, Emre (2011). Kültür: Antropolojik Yaklaşımlar. İçinde A. Ergur
ve E. Gökalp (Der.) Kültür Sosyolojisi: 24–51. Eskişehir: T.C. Anadolu
Üniversitesi Yayını No:2318.
Im, K., Lee, J. ve Tieslau, M. (2005). Panel LM unit-root test with level
shifts. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67 (3): 393-419.
Janssens, J., Hesters, D. ve Lebon, F. (2012). Country profile Belgium.
www.culturalpolicies.net/web/profiles-download.php (06.06.2012).
Jenkins, B. (2009). Cultural spending in Ontario, Canada: trends in public
and private funding. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15 (3): 329-342.
Krebs, S. ve Pommerehne, W.W. (1995). Politico-economic interactions of
German public performing arts institutions. Journal of Cultural Economics, 19(1):
17–32.
Lee, C. ve Chang, C. (2007). Mean reversion of inflation rates in 19 OECD
countries: evidence from panel LM unit root tests with structural breaks.
Economics Bulletin, 3(23): 1-15.
Lee, J., Lee, C. ve Chang, C. (2009). Hysteresis in unemployment
reviseted: evidence from panel LM unit root tests with heterogenous structural
breaks. Bulletin of Economic Research, 61 (4): 325-334.
Lewis, G. B. ve Rushton, M. (2007). Understanding state spending on the
arts: 1976–1999. State and Local Government Review, 39(2): 107–114.
Mangset, P. ve Kleppe, B. (2011). Country profile Norway.
www.culturalpolicies.net/web/profiles-download.php (06.06.2012).
Bakırtaş, D., Aysu, A. DEÜ SBE Dergisi, Cilt: 15, Sayı:3
370
Mitchell, R. ve Heiskanen, I. (2011). Country profile Finland.
www.culturalpolicies.net/web/profiles-download.php (06.06.2012).
Narayan, P. K. ve Prasad, B.C. (2005). The validity of purchasing power
parity fo eleven middle eastern countries. Review of Middle East Economics and
Finance, 3 (2): 135-149.
Nogare, C.D. ve Galizzi, M. M. (2011). The political economy of cultural
spending: evidence from Italian cities. Journal of Cultural Economics, 35(3): 203-
231.
Noonan, D. S. (2007). Fiscal pressures, institutional context, and
constituents: a dynamic model of states’ arts agency appropriations. Journal of
Cultural Economics, 31 (4): 293–310.
OECD, Government expenditure by functions (COFOG).
http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SNA_TABLE11 (10.02.2012).
OECD (2008). National accounts of OECD countries volume I: main
aggregates 1995-2006. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pazarlıoğlu, V. ve Gürler, Ö.K. (2007). Telekomünikasyon yatırımları ve
ekonomik büyüme: panel veri yaklaşımı. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 44
(508): 35-43.
Potrafke, N. (2011). Public expenditures on education and cultural affairs
in the West German states: does government ideology influence the budget
composition?. German Economic Review, 12 (1): 124–145.
Ridge, M.; Flaherty, D.; Caldwell-Nichols, A.; Bradley, R. ve Howell, C.
(2007). A framework for evaluating cultural policy investment.
http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/research/Aframeworkforevaluatingcultura...
yinvestmentnontechnicalsummary.pdf (18.03.2012).
Rosenauer, A. ve Winther, P. (2002). Cultural policies in the EU member
states. European Parliament Directorate-General for Research Working Paper,
EDUC 107A EN.
Rushton, M. (2005). Support for earmarked public spending on culture:
evidence from a referendum in Metropolitan Detroit. Public Budgeting and
Finance, 25(4): 72–85.
Said, E. S. ve Dickey, D. A. (1984). Testing for unit roots in
autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order. Biometrika, 71(3): 509-
607.
Sakınç, S. ve Cura, S. (2012). Mali Sosyalleşme ve Kültür İlişkisi. İçinde
K. Çelebi (Der.) Mali Sosyoloji Üzerine Denemeler: 33-59. Ankara: T.C. Maliye
Bakanlığı Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlığı, Yayın No: 2012/418.
Seçilmiş OECD Ülkelerinde… DEU Journal of GSSS, Vol: 15, Issue: 3
371
Schlafly, P. (2008). How the government influences our culture.
Northwestern University Law Review, 102 (1): 491-494.
Schulze, G. G. ve Rose, A. (1998). Public orchestra funding in Germany:
an empirical investigation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 22(3): 227–247.
Schulze, G. G. ve Ursprung, H. W. (2000). La Donna e` mobile—or is she?
voter preferences and public support for the performing arts. Public Choice, 102
(1-2): 129–147.
Stastna, L. (2009). Spatial interdependence of local public expenditures:
selected evidence from the Czech Republic. Czech Economic Review, 3 (1): 7–25.
Throsby, C.D. and Withers, G.A. (1986). Strategic bias and demand for
public goods: theory and an application to the arts. Journal of Public Economics,
31(3): 307-327.
Wang, S. ve Burton, A.A. (2007). The effect of government size on the
steady state unemployment rate: a structural error correction model. University of
Delaware Working Paper, Working Paper no. 2007-14.
WDI, World data bank. http://databank.worldbank.org/ddp/home.do
(10.02.2012).
Werck, K., Heyndels, B., ve Geys, B. (2008). The impact of ‘‘central
places’’ on spatial spending patterns: evidence from Flemish local governments
cultural expenditures. Journal of Cultural Economics, 32 (1): 35–58.
Wooldridge, J.M. (2002). Introductory economics. Boston: South-Western
College Publishing.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com