Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Patterns and Pedagogy: Exploring Student Blog Use in Higher Education

Journal Name:

  • Contemporary Educational Technology

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
As social and collaborative technologies emerge, educators and scholars continue to explore and experiment with how these tools might impact pedagogy. For over a decade, educators experimented with the use of blogs in academic settings, a tool that allows for students and instructors to enter into a rich dialogue. With most technology tools, users often leave ‘digital footprints’ throughout the environment. These footprints, in combination with other sources of data, allow researchers to explore relationships between the tool itself and the different types of end users. This study examines two years of institutional blog data, combined with demographic data to help describe the users of a blog platform. Different clusters of users are uncovered, and various use cases are explored, illustrating how different instructors choose to leverage blogs in the flow of a course. Using analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare different blogging groups, results show a strong correlation between entry-dominant bloggers and growth in Grade Point Average (GPA) over time. With the rise in popularity of learning analytics, the results of this study might influence future learning analytics tools and systems.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-patterns-and-pedagogy-exploring-student-blog-use-higher-education.pdf
  • 3
96
109
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? Educause Review, 41(2), 32-44.
Barnes, C. & Tynan, B. (2007). The adventures of Miranda in the brave new world: Learning in a Web 2.0 millennium. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 15(3), 189-200.
Barneveld, A., Arnold, K., & Campbell, J. (2012). Analytics in higher education: Establising a common language. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3026.pdf
Boitshwaelo, B. (2011). Proposing an integrated research framework for Connectivism: Utilising theoretical synergies. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 161-179.
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 5(2), 96-109
108
Cano, E., Carbonell, M. R., Lanzo, N. C., & Ion, G. (2012). Developing assessment practices through the use of blogs in higher education: An innovative experience in the open university of Catalonia (pp. 300-305). Presented at the eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest.
Cochrane, T., Bateman, R., & Flitta, I. (2009). Integrating mobile web 2.0 within tertiary education. In A. Méndez-Vilas, A. Solano Martin, J. A. Mesa González, & J. Mesa González (Eds.), Research, reflections and innovations in integrating ICT in education(pp. 1348-1352). Badajoz, Spain: FORMATEX.
Downes, S. (2004). Educational blogging. Educause Review, 39(5), 14-26.
Friesen, N. & Lowe, S. (2011) The questionable promise of social media for education: Connective learning and the commercial imperative. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 183-194.
Glogoff, S. (2005). Instrucitonal blogging: Promoting interactivity, student-centered learning, and peer input. Innovate, 1(15).
Guder, C. (2010). Patrons and pedagogy: A look at the theory of Connectivism. Public Services Quartley, 6(1), 36-42.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., &Tatham, R. L. (2006).Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Hardy, A., Tinney, J., & Davies, S. (2012). Using e-portfolios to support trainee design and technology teachers in developing their subject knowledge. Presented at the Pupil’s Attitude Towards Technology (PATT). Stockholm, Sweden.
Hsu, C. & Lin, J. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45(1), 65-74.
Hurlburt, S. (2008). Defining tools for a new learning space: Writing and reading class blogs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 182-189.
Ion, G. & Stingu, M. (2012). Learning pedagogy through blogs: An experience in initial teacher training. Presented at the eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest.
Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirkup, G., & Conole, G. (2009). An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 31-42.
Kerr, B. (2007). A challenge to Connectivism. Retrieved on 9 April 2013 from http://learningevolves.wikispaces.com/kerr
Kuehl, R. O. (2000). Design of experiments: Statistical principles of research design and analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury/Thomson Learning.
Lei, C., Krilavicius, T., Zhang, N., Wan, K., & Man, K. (2012). Using web 2.0 tools to learning in higher education: A case study in technological education. Paper presented at the International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. Hong Kong.
Maag, M. (2005). The potential use of “Blogs” in nursing education. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 23(1), 16–24.
Oravec, J. A. (2003). Blending by blogging: weblogs in blended learning initiatives. Journal of educational media, 28(2-3), 225–233.
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 5(2), 96-109
109
O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0. - Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved on 12 April 2014 from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html.
Overby, A. (2009). The new conversation: Using weblogs for reflective practice in the studio art classroom. Art Education, 62(4), 18–24.
Radinsky, J., Bouillion, L., Lento, E. & Gomez, L. (2001). Mutual benefit partnership: A curricular design for authenticity. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(4), 405-430.
Rifkin, W., Longnecker, N., Leach, J., Davis, L., & Orthia, L. (2009). Motivate students by having them publish in new media: an invitation to science lecturers to share and test. Proceedings of the Uniserve Science Conference. Sydney, Australia.
Schroeder, A., Minocha, S., & Schneider, C. (2010). The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(3), 159-174.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved on 15 March 2014 from http://itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm.
Siemens, G., Gasevic, D., Haythornthwaite, C., Buckingham Shum, S., Ferguson, R., & Duvel, E. (2011). Open learning analytics: An integrated and modularized platform. Paper presented at the Learning Analytics and Knowledge. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
Waycott, J., Sheard, J., Thompson, C., & Clerehan, R. (2013) Making students’ work visible on the social web: A blessing or a curse? Computers & Education, 68, 86-59.
Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students’ reflectinve learning processes. Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 18-25.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com