Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Bazı Alt Ekstremite Kinematik Parametrelerinin Hentbolda İsabetli Atış Performansına Etkisi

The Effects of Some Lower Extremity Kinematic Parameters on Accuracy Throwing in Team Handball

Journal Name:

  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of throwing velocity and accuracy on some kinematic parameters in elite and amateur handball players. Two groups of young healthy, male subjects took part in the experiments: one group of 9 handball players, Turkish National Handball Team (Group 1 (age:25.44±3.28 year, height: 188.88±6.75 cm, weight: 89.55±10.33 kg), another group of 9 physical education students (Group 2 (age: 22.66±1.58 year, height: 183.88±5.17 cm, weight: 89.00±11.82 kg ). In this study, thirty six overarm throwing performance were recorded by using two cameras (BASLER- A602 fc color, 100 Hz ) and tested using HUBAG software. Student-t test for independent samples was used to compare baseline values between groups. The Pearson product moment correlation coefficient was used to examine the relationship between isokinetic strength and ball velocity. The level of significance was set at 0, 05. Stride lengths of Group II were not increased as a linear, before the throwing. Only there was a signifant diffrences between groups at value of L3(%h) in accuracy throwing (p<.05). The angle of knee flexion bigger than the other group at cocking phase and ball release phase. It was found negative correlation between lead knee flexion and ball release angle and between lead knee flexion angle and trunk side angle in cocking phase at accuracy throwing. There was a significant difference between groups at ball velocity, but elite handball players throw with lower throwing velocity but more accurately.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çalışmanın amacı, hentbolda yüksek temel kale atışlarında bazı kinematik parametrelerin atış hızı ve isabetliliğine etkisinin incelenmesidir. Araştırmaya 9 elit erkek hentbol oyuncusu (Türkiye Milli Hentbol Takımında oynayan)(Grup 1) ve 9 erkek Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulu öğrencisi(Grup 2) olmak üzere toplam 18 sporcu katılmıştır. Her sporcu, üç adım hız alarak atış çizgisinden 6 m uzaklıkta bulunan kalenin üst köşelerine yerleştirilen hedeflere temel atış performansı gerçekleştirmiş, uygulanan performans iki adet hızlı video kamera (BASLER- A602 fc color, 100 Hz) ile kayıt edilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler HUBAG hareket analiz programı ile üç boyutlu olarak analiz edilmiştir. Her sporcu iki kale atışı gerçekleştirmiş, isabetli ve isabetsiz atışları değerlendirilmiştir. Kinematik parametrelerin gruplar arasındaki farklılıklarının belirlenmesinde Student-t testi, Mann-Whitney U testi, parametreler arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesinde Pearson Korelasyonu kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar p<.05 seviyesinde değerlendirilmiştir. Atış öncesi adım uzunluk değerlerinde, Grup 2’de, Grup 1’de olduğu gibi lineer bir artış gözlenmemiş, sadece isabetli atışlarda L3(%h) değerinde gruplar arasında anlamlı fark belirlenmiştir (p<.05). Kurulma evresinde ve topun elden ayrılma evresinde diz fleksiyon açı değerleri Grup 2 için daha büyük bulunmuştur. İsabetli atışlarda kurulma evresinde diz fleksiyon açısı ile topun uçuş açısı ve gövdenin yana eğilme açısı arasında negatif yönde ilişki bulunmuştur. İsabetli kale atışlarında top hızı gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuş, daha fazla isabetli atış yapan grubun top hızı daha düşük belirlenmiştir
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_152775_21_pp_13-20.pdf
  • 1
13–20
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Arıtan S, Çilli M, Amca AM (2010). HUBAG: Üç boyutlu
hareket analizi yazılımı. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 21(1):30-
36.
2. Bayious I. (1998). ISBS: Accuracy and throwing velocity
in handball, Greece.
3. Dun S, Fleisig GS, Loftice J, Kingsley D, Andrews
JR. (2007). The relationship between age and baseball
pitching kinematics in professional baseball pitchers,
Journal of Biomechanics, 40:265-270.
4. Eliasz J. (1998). ISBS: The relationship between
throwing velocity and motor ability parameters of the
high-performance handball players, Belgium.
5. Finch A. (1999). ISBS: Throwing for speed and accuracy,
Stuttgart.
6. Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Zheng N, Escamilla
RF, Andrews JR, Nicholls RL. et al. (1999). 5th
IOC World Congress on Sport Sciences with The
Annual Conference of Science and Medicine in Sport
:A practical evaluation tool for baseball pitching
biomechanics, Sydney.
K AYNAKLAR
7. Fleisig GS, Escamilla RF, Andrews JR, Matsuo T,
Satterwhite Y, Barrentine SW. (1996). Kinematic
and kinetic comparison between baseball pitching and
football passing. Journal of Applied Biomechanics,
12:207-224.
8. Fleisig GS, Kingsley DS, Fotice JW, Dinen KP,
Ranganathan R, Dun S. et al. (2006). Kinetic
comparison among the fastball, curveball, change-up,
and slider in collagiate baseball pitchers, American
Journal of Sports Medicine, 34;423.
9. Fradet L, Botcazou M, Durocher C, Cretual A, Multon
F, Prioux J. et al. (2004). Do handball players always
exhibit a proximal-to-distal segmental sequence?
Journal of Sports Science, 22, 439-447.
10. Hamill J, Knutzen K. (2003). Biomechanical Basis of
Human Movement, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins A
Wolters Kluwer Company, U.S.A.
11. Hirashima M, Kudo K, Ohtsuki T. (2003). Utilization
and compensation of interaction torques during ballthrowing
movements, Journal of Neurophysiology, 89:
1784-1796.
20 Çetin, Muratlı
12. Hoff, J., Almaasbakk,B. (1995). The effects of
maximum strength training on throwing velocity and
muscle strength in female team handball players,
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Reserach, 9(4):
255-258.
13. Hong D., Cheung T.K., Roberts E.R. (2001). A threedimensional,
six-segment chain analysis of forceful
overarm throwing, Journal of Electromyography 11, 95-
112.
14. Hore J. (1996). Motor control, excitement, and overarm
throwing, Journal of Physiology Pharmacology, 74: 385-
389.
15. Ishida K., Hirano Y. (2004). Effects of non-throwing
am on trunk and throwing arm movements in baseball
pitching, International Journal of Sport and Health
Science Vol.2, 119-128.
16. Jensen K, Johansen L., Larson B. (1999). 5th World
Congress on Sport Science and Medicine in Sport :
Physical performance in Danish elite team handball
players, , Sydney.
17. Jöris HJ, van Muyen AJ, van Ingen Schenau GJ,
Kemper HC. (1985). Force, velocity and energy flow
during the overarm throw in female handball players.
Journal of Biomechanics. 18(6), 409-14.
18. Kotzamanidis C, Skoufas K, Hatzikotoulas D, Patikas
G, Koutras H. (1987). ISBS: The relationship between
the physical and strength variables of the lower limbs
and the velocity of ball release in various types of
handball throws.
19. Lidor R, Argov E, Daniel S. (1998). An exploratory
study of perceptual-motor abilities of women: novice
and skilled players of team handball, Perceptual Motor
Skills, 86(1):297-88.
20. Magill RA. (2004). Motor Learning Concept and
Applications, McGraw Hill Companies, U.S.A.
21. Matsuo T, Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW,
Andrews JR. (2001). Comparison of kinematic and
temporal parameters between different pitch velocity
groups. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 17, 1-13.
22. McGinnis PM. (1999). Biomechanics of Sport and
Exercises, Human Kinetics.
23. Morris C, Bartlett R. (1996) Biomechanical factors
critical for performance in the men’s javelin throw.
Sports Medicine, 21, 438-446.
24. Muijen van AE, Jris H, Kemper HCG, Ingen Schenau
Van GJ. (1991). Throwing practice with different ball
weights: effects on throwing velocity and muscle
strength in female handball players. Sports Medicine,
Training and Rehabilitation, 2:103-113.
25. Muratlı S, Toraman F, Çetin E. (2000). Sportif
Hareketlerin Biomekanik Temelleri, Bağırgan Yayınevi,
Ankara.
26. Özer K. (1993) Antropometri. Sporda Morfolojik
Planlama. Kazancı Matbaacılık, 39-61. İstanbul.
27. Schmidt RA,Wrisberg CA. (2000) Motor Learning and
Performance, Human Kinetics.
28. Sachlikidis A, Salter C. (2007). A biomechanical
comparison of dominant and nondominant arm throws
for speed and accuracy, Sports Biomechanics, 6:3, 334-
344.
29. Schmidt RC, Corey D, Fitzpatrick P, Riley M. (1995).
The oscillatory basis of Fitts Law. Ed: G.Bardy, R.J.
Bootsma and Y. Guiard, Studies in Perception and
Action III B. Lawrence Erlbbaum Associates, Inc.
30. Stodden DF, Fleisig GS, McLean SP, Lyman SL,
Andrews JR. (2001). Relationship of pelvis and upper
torso kinematics to pitched baseball velocity. Journal
of Applied Biomechanics. 17(2), 164-172.
31. Sommervoll Y. (2005). Effects of gender and training
experience on kinematical and temporal aspects of
overarm throwing technique, IDR 3900, Master thesis in
Human Movement Science, Human Movement Science
Program, Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology
Management, Norwegian University of Science and
Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
32. Van den Tillaar R. (2004). Effect of different training
programs on the velocity of overarm throwing, A brief
review, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,
18(2), 388-396.
33. Van den Tillaar R, Ettema G. (2003) Influence of
instruction on velocity and accuracy of overarm
throwing, Perceptual and Motor Skills, Apr;96(2):423-
34.
34. Van den Tillaar R, Ettema G. (2007). A threedimensional
analysis of overarm throwing in
experienced handball players, Journal of Applied
Biomechanics, 23:12-19.
35. Wit A, Eliasz J. (1990). A three-dimensional kinematic
analysis of handball throws, Sports Wyczynowy, 9/10,
17-23.
36. Zheng N, Fleisig GS, Barrentine S, Andrews JR.
(2004). Biomechanics of pitching. In George Hung (ed)
Biomedical Engineering Principles in Sports, Kluwer
Akademic/Plenum Publishers, Chapter 9, 209-256.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com