Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

YEM ŞALGAMI {Brassica rapa L.) ÇEŞİTLERİNİN AZOTLU GÜBRELEMEYE KARŞI PERFORMANSLARI

PERFORMANCES OF FORAGE TURNIP (Brassica rapa L.) CULTIVARS UNDER DIFFERENT NITROGEN TREATMENTS

Journal Name:

  • Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The effects of five nitrogen rates (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg ha-1) on root, leaf yields and some yield components of four forage turnips (Agressa, Siloganova, Polybra and Volenda) were evaluated under the Black Sea Coastal Area Conditions in Turkey in the 2002 and 2003 growing seasons. The root yield, root dry matter yield, root crude protein yield, root diameter, root length, leaf yield, leaf dry matter yield, and leaf crude protein yield were determined. Root and leaf yields and their yield components of forage turnip cultivars increased along with increase of nitrogen doses. The highest root and leaf dry matter yields were obtained from cultivar Volenda (7.19 and 5.24 t ha-1, respectively) in the treatments of 150 kg per hectare nitrogen.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Karadeniz Bölgesi sahil koşullarında beş farklı azot dozunun (0, 50, 100, 150 ve 200 kg/ha) dört yem şalgamı çeşidinin (Agressa, Siloganova, Polybra ve Volenda) yumru, yaprak verimi ve verim öğeleri üzerine etkilerinin belirlendiği bu araştırma 2002 ve 2003 yetiştirme periyodunda yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada yumru verimi, yumru kuru madde verimi, yumru ham protein verimi, yumru çapı, yumru boyu, yaprak verimi, yaprak kuru madde verimi ve yaprak ham protein verimi belirlenmiştir. Azotlu gübrelemenin artmasıyla yem şalgamı çeşitlerinin yumru ve yaprak verimi ile diğer verim öğeleri artmıştır. En yüksek yumru ve yaprak kuru madde verimleri hektara 150 kg azotlu gübreleme uygulanan Volenda çeşidinden (sırasıyla 7.19 ve 5.24 t/ha) elde edilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-yem-salgami-brassica-rapa-l.cesitlerinin-azotlu-gubrelemeye-karsi-performanslari.pdf
  • 1
44-48
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Albayrak, S and N. Çamaş. 2005. Effects of different levels and application times of humic acid on root and leaf yield and yield components of forage turnip (Brassica rapa L.). Journal of Agronomy. 4(2): 130-133.
Albayrak, S., N. Çamaş and C.S. Sevimay. 2004. The
influence of row spacing on root and leaf yields and yield components of forage turnip (Brassica rapa L.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 9 (2): 72-77. Anonymous. 2003. Yemlik pancar ve yem şalgamı. Tarım Ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Tarımsal Değerleri Ölçme Denemeleri Teknik Talimatı. Ankara. Atalay, Y.Z. 1997. The effect of different plant densities on yield and yield components on turnip as a second crop under irrigated conditions. Selçuk University, Department of Field Crops. Master Thesis. Beşpınar, A.T. 2003. Effects of plant density on forage yield and quality of forage turnip grown under Ankara Conditions. Ankara University, Department of Field Crops. Master Thesis. Griffin, J.L., G.A. Jung., N.L. Hartwig. 1984. Forage yield and quality of Brassica sp. established using preemergence herbicides. Agronomy Journal. 76: 114¬116.
Jung, G.A., R.A. Byers., M.T. Panciera and J.A. Shaffer. 1986. Forage dry matter accumulation and quality of turnip, swede, rape, Chinese hybrids, and kale in the eastern USA. Agronomy Journal. 78: 245-253. Jung, G.A., R.E. Kocher and A. Glica. 1984. Minimum-tillage forage turnip and rape production hill land as influenced by sod suppression and fertilizer. Agronomy
Journal. 76: 404-408.
Jung, G.A., W.L. McClellan., R.A. Byers., R.E. Kocher., L.D. Hoffman and H.J. Donley. 1983. Conservation tillage fo forage Brassicas. J. Soil Water Conserve. 38 (3):227-230.
Kalmbacher, R.S., P.H. Everett., F.G. Martin and G.A. Jung. 1982. The management of brassica for winter forages in the sub-tropics. Grass Forage Sci. 37: 219¬225.
Karakaya, A and S. Altınok. 2002. Forage yield and quality of different turnip cultivars grown as main and second crop under Ankara conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 7 (2): 67-72. Karakaya, A and D.W. Koch. 1995. Brassica forage response to nitrogen fertilizer. University of Wyoming, Forage Research and Demonstrations, 1991-1993 Progress Reports.76-81. Martin,R.C., H.D.Voldeng and D.L. Smith. 1990. Intercropping soybean for silage in a cool temperate region: yield, protein and economic effects. Field Crops
Research. 23: 295-310.
Mülayim, M.,
R
. Acar and Y.Z. Atalay. 1996. The effects of plant densities and harvesting times on root yield of forage turnip as a second crop in Konya. Selçuk University, Journal of Agriculture Faculty. 10(13): 141-151.
Nelson, D. W and L.E. Sommers. 1980. Total nitrogen analysis in soil and plant tissues. Journal of the Official Analytical Chemists. 63, 770- 778. Pelletier, G.E, E. Donefer and J.P.F. Darisse. 1976. Effects of dates of seeding and levels of N fertilization on yields, chemical composition an in vitro digestibility of
forage kale. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56: 63-70.
47
Performances of Forage Turnip (Brassica rapa L.) Cultivars Under Different Nitrogen Treatments
Rao, S.C and F.P. Horn. 1986. Planting season and harvest date effects on dry matter production and nutritional value for Brassica ssp. in the southern great plain. Agronomy Journal. 78: 327-333.
SAS Institute. 1998. INC SAS/STAT users' guide release 7.0, Cary, NC, USA.
Uzun, A. 1990. Investigations on yield and quality of turnip grown as a second crop under Bursa conditions. Uludağ University, Department of Field Crops. Master Thesis.
Wiedenhoeft, M.H and B.A. Barton.1994. Management and environment effects of brassica forage quality. Agronomy Journal. 86: 227-232.
48

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com