Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

KESTANE FİDANLARINDA KANSERE (Cryphonectriaparasitica (Murrill) Barr) KARŞI YAPILAN UYGULAMALAR

VARIOUS CONTROL METHODS USED AGAINST CHESTNUT BLIGHT (Cryphonectria parasitica (Murrill) Barr) IN CHESTNUT GRAFTED TREES

Journal Name:

  • Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This research was conducted with the aim to control the chestnut blight disease (Cryphonectria parasitica (Murrill) Barr) in a chestnut orchard in 1998-2003. Grafted trees of SA 5-1, SE 3-12, SE 18-2, SE 21-2, SE 21-9, 552-8, 552-10, 554-2, 554-14, 552-7 and 556-8 chestnut genotypes, copper oxychlorite (5%), benomyl 50 WP (60 g /100 l water) and some hypovirulent strains were used and effects of cultural, chemical and biological control methods on controlling the chestnut blight disease were investigated in this study. Total mortality rates due to disease were changed in the range of 12.5 and 87.5 % for chesnut genotypes. The highest dryness rate was SA 5-1 genotype (87.5%) and the lowest dryness rate was 552-8 genotype (12.5%)
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırma, 1998-2003 yılları arasında bir kestane bahçesindeki kestane kanseri (Cryphonectria parasitica (Murrill) Barr) ile mücadele etme yollarını amaçlamıştır. Çalışmada SA 5-1, SE 3-12, SE 18-2, SE 21-2, SE 21-9, 552-8, 552-10, 554-2, 554-14, 552-7 ve 556-8 kestane genotiplerine ait fidanlara, bakır oksiklorür (5%), benomyl 50 WP (60 g /100 l water) ve bazı hipovirulent ırklar kullanılmış ve kestane kanserinin mücadelesinde kültürel, kimyasal ve biyolojik mücadele yöntemlerinin etkileri araştırılmıştır. Hastalıktan dolayı kestane genotiplerinde % 12.5 - 87.5 oranında kuruma olmuştur. En yüksek kuruma oranı SA 5-1 genotpinde (%87.5) ve en düşük kuruma oranı ise 552-8 genotipinde meydana gelmiştir
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kestane-fidanlarinda-kansere-cryphonectriaparasitica-murrill-barr-karsi-yapilan-uygulamalar.pdf
  • 1
24-29
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Allemann, C., P. Hoegger, U. Heiniger ve D. Rigling, 1999. Genetic Variation of Cryphonectria hypoviruses in europe, Assesed Using Restriction Fragment Length polymorphisim (RFLP) Markers. Moleculer Ecology, 8, 843-854.
Anagnostakis, S., 1987. Chestnut Blight: The Classical problem of an Introduced Pathogen. Mycologia, 79(1), 23-37.
Anonymous, 2003. FAO Kayıtları.
http:/apps 1.fao.org/servlet/XteSevle...n.Crops. Antognozzi, E. ve P. Proietti, 1993. Comparison among different kinds of grafting on conversion of chestnut from coppice to orchard. Proc. International Congress on Chestnut, October 20¬23, Spoleto, Italy. p. 243-245.
Bazzigher, G., 1981. Selection of Blight-resistant Chestnut Trees in Switzerlve. Eup. J. For. Pathol. 11:199-207.
Bazzigher, G. ve G.A. Miller, 1991. Blight-Resistant
Chestnut Selections of Switzerlve: A Valuable Germ Plasm Resource. Plant Disease, 75(1), 5-9. Bisiach, M., E. Gobbi ve M. Intropido,, 1985. Esperienze di lotta Biologica Contro il Cancro Della Corteccia del Castagno. La Difesa Delle
Piante 2: 187-196. Burnham, C.R., Rutter, P.A., French, D.W., 1986.
Breeding blight-resistant chestnuts. Plant Breeding
Reviews 4, 347-397.
Canciani, L., E. Dallavalle, A. Zambonelli ve A.Z. D'aulerio, 1997. Chemical control trials on chestnut grafting. Hort. Abst. 67: 2701. Cortesi, P., D. Rigling ve U. Heiniger, 1998. Comparison of Vegetative Compatibility Types in Italian ve Swiss Subpopulations of Cryphonectria parasitica. Eur. J. For. Path. 28, 167-176. Dunn, M.M. ve G.J. Bolve, 1993. Hypovirulent Isolates of Cryphonectria parasitica in Southern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Phytopathology, 15, 245-252. Erper, 1., Serdar, Ü., Karaca, G., 2004. Bazı kestane (Castanea sativa Mill.) genotiplerinin Cryphonectria parasitica (Murrill) Barr'a duyarlılıklarının belirlenmesi. OMÜ Zir. Fak.
Dergisi,19(1):46-49.
Falcini, L. M. ıntropido ve M. Bisiach, 1980. Nuove Acquisizioni Sull'ipovirulanza di Endothia parasitica e Implicazioni Relative alla lotta Biologica Contro il Cancro del Castagno. Il Montanario D'Italia 31: 111/53-111/59. Fulbright, D.W., 1984. Effect of Eliminating dsRNA in Hypovirulent Endothia parasitica.
Phytopathology 74:722-724. Garrod, S.W., D.W.
Fulbrigh
t ve A.V. Ravenscroft, 1985. Dissemination of Virulent ve Hypovirulent Forms of a Marked Strain of Endothia parasitica in Michigan. Phytopathology 75:533-538. Grente, J. ve S. Berthelay-Sauret, 1978. Biological Control of Chestnut Blight in France. Pp 30-34 (In proceedings of the American Chestnut Sympossium Eds, Eds. W.L. MacDonald, F.C. Cech, J. Luchock ve C. Smith. West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, 122p.). Grente, J., 1981. Les Variants Hypovirulents de Endothia parasitica et la Lutte Biologique Contra le Chancre du Chataignier . Ph.D Thesis, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France,
195p.
28
H. M. Aksoy, Ü. Serdar, A. Soylu
Gümüşdere, İ., 1994. Ormanlarımızda önemli bir ağaç türü KESTANE. Tabiat ve İnsan 27(4):21-26.
Gürer, M., 2000. Dünya Kestane Üretimi, Ticareti ve Yetiştiriciliği. Tabiat ve İnsan 34(2), ISSN 1302¬1001.
Gürer, M., T. Turchetti, P. Biagioni ve G. Maresi, 2001. Assesment and Characterisation of Turkish Hypovirulent Isolates of Cryphonectria parasitica (Murr.) Barr. Phytopathol. Mediterr., 40, 265-275.
Heiniger, U. ve D. Rigling, 1991. Biological Control of Chestnut Blight in Europe. Annu. Rev. Phytopath., 12, 581-599.
Kubisiak, T.L., F.V. Hebard, C.D. Nelson, J. Zhang, R.
Bernatzky, H. Huang, S.L. Anagnostakis ve R.L. Doudrick, 1997. Molecular Mapping of Resistance to Blight in an Interspecific Cross in the Genus Castanea. Phytopathology, 87(7), 751¬759.
Mittempergher, L., 1978. The present Status of Chestnut Blight in Italy. Pp.34-37 (In Proceedings of the American chestnut Symposium. Eds. W.L. MacDonald, F.C. Cech, J. Luchock ve C. Smith. West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, 122p.).
Montecchio, L., R. Causin ve S.M. Accordi, 1996. Trials on the protection of chestnut grafts against Cryphonectria parasitica. Hort. Abst. 66: 10199.
Palenzone, M., 1978. Programma di Studio Ed Interventi per la utilizzazione, la Rigenerazione e la Trasformazione Delle Forests Castanili piemontesi. Relazione Tecnica Sull'attivita Svolta Torino, Italia .
Piagnani, C., F. Faoro, S. Sant ve A. Vercesi, 1997. Growth ve Ultrastructural Modifications to Chestnut Calli Induced by Culture Filtrates of Virulent ve Hypovirulent Cryphonectria parasitica Strains. Eur. J. For. Path., 27, 23-32.
Robin, C. C. Anziani ve P. Cortesi, 2000. Relationship Between Biological Control; Incidence of hypovirulence ve Diversity of Vegetative Compatibilty Types of Cryphonectria parasitica
in France. Phytopathology, 90(7), 730-737.
Seabre, R.C. ve
M.S
. Pais, 1998. Genetic Transformation of European Chesnut. Plant Cell
Reports, 17: 177-182. Serdar, Ü., 1999. Selection of chestnut (C. sativa Mill.) in Sinop vicinity. Proc. 2 nd Int. Symp. on
Chestnut. Acta Hort. 494. p. 327-332.
Serdar, Ü., Soylu, A., 1999. Selection of chestnut (C. sativa Mill.) in Samsun vicinity. Proc. 2 nd Int.
Symp. on Chestnut. Acta Hort. 494. p. 333-338.
Soylu, A., 1984. Kestane Yetiştiriciliği ve Özellikleri. Atatürk Bahçe Kültürleri Araştırma Enstitüsü Yay. No: 59, Yalova.
Turchetti, T., 1978. Attachi di Endothia parasitica (Murr) ve su Innesiti di Castagno. L'Ital. Forest. Mont. 33: 135-141.
Turchetti, T., 1982. Hypovirulence in Chestnut Blight (Endothia parasitica (Murr) ve Some Pratical Aspects in Italy. Europ. J. For. Pathol. 12:414¬417.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com