You are here

Türkiye’de Ana Arı Üretiminin Değerlendirilmesi

Evaluation of Queen Bee Production in Turkey

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The main objective of this study is to determine the current situation of the queen bee production in Turkey. In accordance with this objective, we will suggest solutions by dealing with queen bee production capacity by country and the situation of queen bee producers. The main data contain numerous related studies conducted in Turkey and other countries. This study reviews this field studies and synthesis them to reach general deductions. The performance of the queen bee affects the performance of the colony. The quality of the queen bee is extremely important in honey yield of the colony. Honey yield of Turkey per colony is only 14 kg in 2014; the queen bee factor is among the major causes of low yield. The annual capacity of 104 queen bee producers authorized by ministry is about 351 thousands of queen bees. These producers are active in 28 provinces of the country. Consequently, the annual queen bee production capacity does not meet the requirements of seven million colonies in the country. There are no studies available on the ability of existing queen bee production facilities to increase their capacity and capital requirements. In addition, no feasibility study was carried out to establish new queen bee production facility. Moreover, there are no studies including the technical and economic activities of queen bee producers in Turkey at enterprise level. Data-based answers should be analyzed to meet this need by calculating the existing bee producers’ capacity expansion trends and additional investment costs needed by the existing beekeeping enterprises in queen bee production.
Abstract (Original Language): 
The main objective of this study is to determine the current situation of the queen bee production in Turkey. In accordance with this objective, we will suggest solutions by dealing with queen bee production capacity by country and the situation of queen bee producers. The main data contain numerous related studies conducted in Turkey and other countries. This study reviews this field studies and synthesis them to reach general deductions. The performance of the queen bee affects the performance of the colony. The quality of the queen bee is extremely important in honey yield of the colony. Honey yield of Turkey per colony is only 14 kg in 2014; the queen bee factor is among the major causes of low yield. The annual capacity of 104 queen bee producers authorized by ministry is about 351 thousands of queen bees. These producers are active in 28 provinces of the country. Consequently, the annual queen bee production capacity does not meet the requirements of seven million colonies in the country. There are no studies available on the ability of existing queen bee production facilities to increase their capacity and capital requirements. In addition, no feasibility study was carried out to establish new queen bee production facility. Moreover, there are no studies including the technical and economic activities of queen bee producers in Turkey at enterprise level. Data-based answers should be analyzed to meet this need by calculating the existing bee producers’ capacity expansion trends and additional investment costs needed by the existing beekeeping enterprises in queen bee production.
104
107

REFERENCES

References: 

Akyol E., Korkmaz A., Yeninar H and Çakmak İ., 2008. An
observation study on the effects of queen age on some
characteristics of honeybee colonies. Italian Journal
and Animal Sciences, 7(1): 19-25.
Arslan S and Hamgir B., 2010. The effects of different
colony population sized queenright & queenless
starting colonies and rearing season on queen bee
(apis mellifera l.) quality and rearing parameters.
Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa
University, 27(2): 81-88.
Emir M., 2015. Exploring the socio economic structure of
beekeepers and their production efficiency in Turkey.
PhD Thesis. Ondokuz Mayis University Department of
Agricultural Economics, Samsun.
Erkan C and Aşkın Y., 2001. The structure and activities of
beekeeping in Bahçesaray, Van. Yuzuncu Yil University
Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(1): 19-28.
Fıratlı Ç., 2007. Breeding queen bee in Turkey. Beekeeping
Seminar in Aegean, 15-16 February, İzmir.
Fıratlı Ç., Genç F., Karacaoglu M and Gençer HV., 2000.
Comparative analysis of beekeeping in Turkey,
problems and suggestions. Turkey Agricultural
Engineering V. Technically Congress, 17-21 January,
Ankara.
Gencer HV and Fıratlı Ç., 1999. Morphological
characteristics of the Central Anatolian (A. m.
anatoliaca) and Caucasian (A. m. caucasica) honey
bees. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science,
23(1): 107-113.
Genç F., Emsen B and Dodologlu A., 2005. Effects of
rearing period and grafting method on the queen bee
rearing. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 27(1): 45-
48.
Guler A., 2010. A morphometric model for determining the
effect of commercial queen bee usage on the native
honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) population in a Turkish
province. Apidologie, 41(6): 622-635.
Güler A., 2006. Instrumental insemination in honey bee
(Apis mellifera L.) and its importance for Turkey.
Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Faculty of
Agriculture, 21(3): 370-378.
Güler A and Alpay H., 2005. Reproductive characteristics of
some honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) genotypes. Journal
of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 4: 864-870.
Güler A and Toy H., 2013. Relationship between dead pupa
removal and season and productivity of honey bee
Apis mellifera, Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies. Turkish
Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 37: 462-467.
Harbo JR., 1986. Oviposition rates of instrumentally
inseminated and naturally mated queen honeybees
(Hymenoptera: Apidae). Annals of the Entomological
Society of America, 79: 112-115.
Kutlu MA., 2014. Determining the current status of
Gaziantep province its beekeeping problems and
solutions. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural
Sciences, 1(4): 481-484.
Linksvayer TA., Kaftanoglu O., Akyol E., Blatch S., Amdam
GV and Page RE., 2011. Larval and nurse worker control
of developmental plasticity and the evolution of honey
bee queen–worker dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary
Biology, 24: 1939-1948.
Morse RA., 1979. Rearing Queen Honey Bees. New York,
USA: Wicwas Press.
Oskay D., 2008. Protecting diversity of native honey bee
subspecies, developing a model on colony
management and breeding. Uludag Bee Journal 8(2):
63-72.
Ozturk AI., 2014. Quality concept in honey bee queen and
factors affecting of the its quality. Journal of Aegean
Agricultural Research Institute, 24(1): 59-65.
Şahinler N and Kaftanoğlu O., 1997. The effects of the
eggs and larvae transfer on the quality of queen
honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Mustafa Kemal University
Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 2(1): 123-138.
Wen X., Li X., Gao L and Sang H., 2014. Honey bees mating
optimization algorithm for process planning problem.
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25: 459–472.
Woyke J., 1967. Rearing conditions and the number of
sperms reaching the spermatecha. XXI. International
Apiculture Congress of Apimondia, Bucharest,
Romania.
Woyke J., 1971. Correlation between the age at which
honeybee brood was grafted characteristics of
resultant queen and insemination. Journal of
Apicultural Research, 10(1): 45-55.
Yalçın FÇ., 2014. The production of honey and other bee
products and the potantial of organic production in
the enterprises engaged in beekeeping in the central
district of Tokat Province. Ms Thesis, Gaziosmanpasa
University Graduate School of Natural and Applied
Sciences, Tokat.
Zhdanova TS., 1967. Influence of nest temperature on
quality of queens produced artificially. XXI.
International Apiculture Congress of Apimondia,
Bucharest, Romania.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com