You are here

Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde Aile Hekimliği

FAMILY PRACTICE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this paper is to review the history, definitions and principles of family medicine specialization in USA, to facilitate the comprehension of terminology relevant to family practice.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu yazı aile hekimliği uzmanlığının geliştiği ilk ülkelerden biri olan ABD'de ilgili tarihçe, farklı tanım, ilke ve düşünce okullarını gözden geçirmek, aile hekimliğinin terminolojisini daha anlaşılır kılmayı amaçlamaktadır.
79-86

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Rakel RE. The family physician. Textbook of Family Practice'de. Ed. Rakel RE. 6. baskı. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Company, 2002; 3-4.
2. Saultz JW. An overview and history of the specialty of family practice. Textbook of Family Medicine'da. Ed. Saultz JW. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2000; 3-16.
3. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2004. With Chartbook on Trends in Health of Americans. Hyattsville, Maryland 2004; 310.
4. Starfield B, Oliver T. Primary care in the United States and its precarious future. Health & Social Care in the Community 1999; 7: 315.
5. AAFP. Facts about Family Practice. Kansas City, MO: AAFP, 1996, p. 193.
6. Randolph L, Seidman B, Pasko T. Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the US American Medical Association, Chicago, 1997.
7. Kahn NB Jr, Schmittling GT, Garner JG, Graham R. Entry of US medical school graduates into family practice residencies: 1997-1998 and 3-year summary. Fam Med 1998; 30: 554-63.
Türkiye Aile Hekimliği Dergisi |
Turkish Journal of Family Practice | Cilt 10 | Sayı 2 | 2006 85
8. Barzansky B, Jonas HS, Etzel SI. Educational programs in US medical schools, 1997-1998. JAMA 1998; 280: 803-8.
9. McPherson DS, Schmittling GT, Pugno PA, Kahn NB Jr. Entry of US medical school graduates into family practice residencies: 2002-2003 and 3-year summary. Fam Med 2003; 35: 555-63.
10. AAFP. 2003 National Resident Matching Program results. Match results and information. www.aafp.org/match/graph02.html.adresinden 24.05.2005 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
11.
Aktür
k Z, Dağdeviren N (çeviri editörleri). Aile Hekimliğinin Kilometre Taşları: Millis ve Willard Raporları. Türkiye Aile Hekimliği Uzmanlık Derneği Yayınları, İstanbul, 2004.
12. The General Practitioner in Gurope, A statement by the working party appo¬inted by the second European Conference on the Teaching of General Practi¬ce (Leuwenhorst Netherlands 1974). http://euract.org/html/doc015.shtml adresinden 20/01/2006 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
13. Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services and Tech¬nology. New York, Oxford University Press, 1998.
14. Wonca Europe 2002. The European Definition of General Practice/Family Medicine.
15. Definition of Family Medicine, ABFM 2005. http://www.aafp.org/x6809.xmm adresinden 24/05/2005 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
16. Carmichael LP. Introduction to family medicine. Family Medicine: Principles and Applications'da. Ed. Medalie JH. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1978; xv-xviii.
17. Ransom DC, Vandervoort HE. The development of family medicine: prob¬lematic trends. JAMA1973; 225: 1098-102.
18. Ramsey CR. Family Systems in Medicine. New York, Guilford Press, 1989;
3-4.
19. Medalie JH. Family Medicine: Principles and Applications. Baltimore, Wil¬liams & Wilkins, 1978; 4.
20. McWhinney IR. A Textbook of Family Medicine. New York, Oxford University Press, 1989; 9.
21. Stephens GG. Developmental assessment of family practice: an insider's view. Family Medicine: The Maturing of a Discipline'de. Eds. Doherty WJ, Christiansen CE, Susman MB. New York, Haworth Press, 1987; 11.
22. Saultz JW. A theoretical framework for the discipline of family medicine.The Textbook of Family Medicine'da. Ed. Saultz JW. New York,
McGraw-Hill, 2000; 17-29.
23. Stephens GG. The Intellectual Basis of Family Practice. Tucson AZ, Winter
Publishing, 1982; 7.
24. Adler MJ. The Conditions of Philosophy. New York, Atheneum, 1965.
25. McWhinney IR. General practice as an academic discipline. Reflections af¬ter a visit to the United States. Lancet 1966; 1: 419-23.
26. Turnbull T. Balancing GP. responsability between practice and patient. NZ Family Physician 1999; 26(3). http://www.rnzcgp.org.nz/NZFP/Is-sues/June99/edit.htm adresinden 24/05/2005 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
27. Kahn NB Jr. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Annals of Family Medicine 2004; 2: S3-S32.
28. Halvorsen JG. Family Medicine's Failures: Reflections on Keystone III.
Family Medicine 2001; 33: 390-2.
29. Rivo ML, Jackson DM, Clare FL. Comparing physician workforce reform
recommendations. JAMA 1993; 270: 1083-4.
30. Society of Teachers of Family Medicine: STFM Membership Directory.
Kansas City, MO: STFM, 1996-1997.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com