You are here

Home » Content

KONAKLAMA İŞLETMESİ ÇALIŞANLARININ DOUGLAS McGREGOR'UN X VE Y TEORİLERİNE YÖNELİK TUTUMLARI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

A RESEARCH ON THE ATTITUDES OF ACCOMMODATION ESTABLISHMENT EMPLOYEES TOWARDS DOUGLAS McGREGOR'S THEORY X AND Y

Journal Name:

  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2016

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Douglas McGregor's X and Y Theories have an important position in management approaches history. X Theory that was suggested by McGregor almost summarizing the Classical management approach, the Y Theory gives idea about the core of Neo-classical management approach. Managers' and employees' attitudes about Douglas McGregor's Theory X and Y can give an idea about their management approach preferences. In this sutdy, it is aimed to investigate how hotel managers and employees evaluate other employees with regards to Theory X and Y. At the end of research it is determined that participants have relatively closer point of view to Y Theory.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Douglas McGregor'u n X ve Y Teorileri yöntemin yaklaşımları tarihinde önemli bir yere sahiptir. McGregor tarafından ortaya atılan X Teorisi adeta Klasik yönetim yaklaşımını özetlerken, Y Teorisi ise Neo-klasik yönetim yaklaşımının özü hakkında fikir vermektedir. Yöneticilerin ve çalışanların Douglas McGregor'un X-Y Teorileri hakkındaki tutumları, tercih edecekleri yönetim yaklaşımları hakkında fikir verebilir. Bu araştırmada; konaklama işletmeleri yöneticileri ve çalışanlarının diğer çalışanları X-Y Teorileri çerçevesinde nasıl değerlendirdiklerini incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri anket tekniği ile toplanmış ve veriler nicel yöntemler ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda katılımcıların nispeten Y Teorisine daha yakın bir bakış açısında sahip oldukları belirlenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-konaklama-isletmesi-calisanlarinin-douglas-mcgregorun-x-y-teorilerine-yonelik-tutumlari-uzerine-bir-arastirma.pdf
  • 14
81
91
  • Turkish

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Aydın, O.T.
(2012)
. "The impact of Theory X, Theory Y and Theory Z on Research Performance: An Empirical Study from a Turkish University", International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 1(5), 24-30.
Bobic, M.P. ve Davis, W.E. (2003). "A Kind Word for Theory X: Or Why so many Newfangled Management Techniques Quickly Fail". Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 239- 264.
Gholamrezaei, M., Naserieh, M.Y. ve Esmaeilzadeh, M. (2012). "Investigation of Relation Between X&Y Theory and A&B Behavioral Models (Case Studies: Mazandaran And Vali-Asr Universities Iran)", Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(9), 9390-9397.
Hiriyappa, B. (2009). Organizational Behavior, Delhi: New Age International Publishing.
Ismail, M.B.M. (2012, January). "An Analysis of Human Motivation in National Higher Education Universities (Nheu) Using Theory X And Theory Y: Academic Staff Perspective", International Symposium on Harnessing Knowledge Through Research to Address Emerging Global Issues, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka.Sri Lanka.
Kalaycı, Ş. (2009). Spss Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
Kopelman R.E., Prottas,
D.J
. ve Davis, A.L. (2008). "Douglas McGregor's Theory X and Y: Toward a Construct-Valid Measure", Journal of Managerial Issues, 20(2), 255-271.
Kopelman, R.E., Prottas, D.J. ve Falk, D.W. (2009). "Construct Validation of Theory X/Y Behavior Scale", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(2), 120-135.
Kopelman, R.E., Prottas, D.J. ve Falk, D.W. (2012). "Further Development of a Measure of Theory X and Y Managerial Assumptions", Journal of Managerial Issues, 24(4), 450-470.
McGregor, D. (1957). "The Human Side of Enterprise", Management Review, 46(11), 166-171.
Mohamed, R.K.M.H. ve Nor, C.S.M. (2013). "The Relationship Between Mcgregor's X-Y Theory Management Style And Fulfillment of Psychological Contract: A Literature Review", International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(5), 715-720.
Morse, J.J. ve Lorsch, J.W. (1970). "Beyond Theory Y", Harvard Business Review, May-June, 61-68.
Neuliep, J.W. (1987). "The Influence of Theory X and Theory Y Management Styles on the Selection of Compliance-Gaining Strategies", Communication Research Reports, 4(1), 14-19.
Özveren, M. (2008). Yönetim Düşünce Sistemi ve Temel Kavramlar, İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
Patel, V. (2007). Concepts and Issues in Management, Jaipur: Global Media Publishing.
90
Süleyman
Demire
l Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, Yıl: 201 6, Cilt: 7, Sayı: 1 4, ss.81-91. Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Visionary, Year: 2016, Volume: 7, Number: 14, pp.81-91.
Ramasamy, T. (2009). Principles of Management, Mumbai: Global Media Publishing.
Russ, T.L. (2011a). "Theory X/Y Assumptions as Predictors of Managers' Propensity for Participative Decision Making", Management Decision, 49(5), 823-836.
Russ T.L. (2011b). "The Relationship Between Theory X/Y Assumptions and Communication Apprehesion", Leadership and Organisation Development Journal, 34(3), 238-249.
Simionel, A.B. (2011). "Douglas McGregor Theory X and Theory Y", Revista de Management si Inginerie Economics, 10(3), 229-234.
Şahin, A. (2004). "Yönetim Kuramları ve Motivasyon İlişkisi", Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(1), 532-547.
Thomas, N. (2004). Concise Adair on Teambuilding and Motivation, Londra: Thorogood Publishing.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com