You are here

Home » Content

Farklı polisaj uygulamaları sonrasında, hibrid bir kompozit rezinin yüzey temas açısının belirlenmesi

Determination of surface contact angle of a hybrid composite resin after different polishing

Journal Name:

  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of four different polishing applications on surface contact angle of composite samples after polimerizing with a halogen light unit. Method: A hybrid composite resin (Filtek-Z250) was used in the study. The composite resin samples (“10mm diameter x 2mm high”) were prepared in cylindirical teflon molds and samples were polymerized with a halogen light unit. Then they were ground with a 600 grid carborundum paper. Four different polishing procedures were applied on surfaces of samples; 1- Polishing discs set (Kerr-Hawe), 2- Light-polimerized polishing burnish (BisCover-LV), 3- Polishing pat/finishing discs/rubber (Enhance; Prisma Gloss), 4- Polishing pat/finishing discs/rubber (Enhance; Prisma Gloss Extra-Fine) (n=7). “Contact-Angle Measurement Device” (Easy Drop Gonyo-meter, Krüss, Hamburg, Germany) was used to measure the contact angles of samples. The right and left contact angles of each drop were measured with “droplet method” and mean ranges were calculated.Two-way variance analyse and Dunnet-T3 multi-comparison test were used for statistical analyses (p<0,05). Results: Statistical differences were found on the effects of different polishing procedures (p<0,05). The lowest surface contact angle values were gained with polishing pat/finishing discs/rubber set (Enhance; Prisma Gloss), and the highest surface contact angle values were obtained with light-polimerized polishing burnish (BisCover-LV). Discussion: The lowest surface contact angle may be obtained by a polishing pat/finishing discs/rubber set.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Bu çalışmada, halojen ışık kaynağı ile polimerize edilen kompozit rezin örneklere dört farklı polisaj işlemi uygulanmasının, örneklerin yüzey temas açısı üzerine etkisinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.Yöntem: Çalışmada, hibrit bir kompozit rezin olan Filtek-Z250 kullanıldı. “10mm x 2mm” ebatlarındaki silindirik şekilli teflon kalıplarda hazırlanan kompozit örnekler halojen ışık kaynağıyla polimerize edildi ve 600 gridlik zımpara kağıdı ile zımparalandı. Örnek yüzeylerine; “1- Polisaj diskleri seti (Kerr-Hawe), 2- Işıkla-sertleşen rezin polisaj cilası (BisCover-LV), 3- Polisaj patı/bitirme diskleri/lastiği seti (Enhance; Prisma Gloss), 4- Polisaj patı/bitirme diskleri/lastiği seti (Enhance; Prisma Gloss Extra-Fine)” olmak üzere dört farklı polisaj seti ile polisaj işlemi uygulandı (n=7). Örneklerin yüzey temas açılarının ölçülmesinde “Temas-Açısı Ölçüm Cihazı” (Easy Drop Gonyo-meter, Krüss, Hamburg, Germany) kullanıldı. “Damlacık yöntemi” ile ve her damlacığın sağ ve sol temas açıları ölçülerek ortalama değerler hesaplandı. Veriler, İki-Yönlü Varyans-Analizi ve Dunnet-T3 Çoklu-Karşılaştırma-Testi‟yle istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi (p<0,05). Sonuçlar: Farklı polisaj işlemlerinin, incelenen kompozit rezinin yüzey temas açısını istatistiksel olarak farklı etkilediği gözlendi (p<0,05). En düşük yüzey temas açısı değerleri sağlayan polisaj işlemi, polisaj patı/bitirme diskleri/lastiği seti (Enhance; Prisma Gloss) ile, en yüksek yüzey temas açısı değerleri gösteren polisaj işlemi ise polisaj cilasıyla (BisCover-LV) elde edildi (p<0,05). Tartışma: En düşük yüzey temas açısı bir polisaj patı/bitirme diskleri/lastiği seti ile elde edilebilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-farkli-polisaj-uygulamalari-sonrasinda-hibrid-bir-kompozit-rezinin-yuzey-temas-acisinin-belirlenmesi.pdf
  • 2
62-68
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Tyas MJ. Colour stability of composite resins: a clinical comparison. Aust Dent J 1992; 37: 88-90.
2. Da Costa J, Ferracane J, Paravina RD, et al. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19: 214-226.
3. Yap AU. Occlusal contact area (OCA) wear of two new composite restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 194-200.
4. Setcos JC, Tarim B, Suzuki S. Surface finish produced on resin composites by new polishing systems. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 169-173.
5. Roulet JF, Gegrange M. Adhesion. The silent revolution in Dentistry. Germany: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 2000: 31.
6. Glantz PO. Adhesion to teeth. Int Dent J 1977; 27: 324-332.
7. Buonocore MG. Principles of adhesive retention and adhesive restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1963; 67:382-391.
8. Rasmussen ST. Fracture studies of adhesion. J Dent Res 1978; 57: 11-20.
9. St-Georges AJ, Bolla M, Fortin D, et al. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 593-597.
10. Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, et al. Finishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 275-279.
11. Lu H, Roeder LB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Esthet Rest Dent 2003; 15: 297-303.
12. Paravina RD, Roeder L, Lu H, et al. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 262-266.
13. Turkun LS, Turkun M. The effect of one step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 203-211.
14. Summit JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS. Fundamentals of operative dentistry: a contemporary approach, 2 nd ed. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 2002: 237.
15. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes B. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1382-1390.
16. Turssi CP, Saad JR, Duarte SL Jr, et al. Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 136-138.
17. Zheng, L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, et al. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 97-104.
18. Rosa BT, Perdigao J. Bond strength of nonrinsing adhesives. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 353-358.
19. Sturdevant CM, Roberson TM, Heymann HO, et al. The art and science of operative dentistry, 3rd ed. St Louis, Baltimore, Berlin, Mosby-Year Book, 1995; 241-246.
20. Silikas N, Kavvadia K, Eliades G,et al. Surface characterization of modern resin composites: a multitechnique approach. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 95-100.
21. Field J, Waterhouse P, German M. Quantifying and qualifying surface changes on dental hard tissues in vitro. J Dent 2010; 38: 182-190.
22. Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, et al. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2007; 18: 155-163.
23. Zhang XZ, Anderson P, Dowker SEP, et al. Optical profilometric study of changes in surface roughness of enamel during in vitro demineralization. Caries Res 2000; 34: 164-174.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com