You are here

Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi Öğrencilerinin Öğretmenlik Meslek Bilgisi Derslerine İlişkin Motivasyon ve Başarı Düzeyleri

Fine Arts Education Students' Motivation and Achievement Levels in Teacher Education

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study was to determine the achievement levels, and the factors affecting the achievement of the students in the departments of Teaching Music and Teaching Art in pedacological courses. The findings of the study revealed that students in Teaching Music and Teaching Arts had lower grades in pedacological courses than the students in other areas of teaching. The analysis made to understand why these diferences were found showed that students in Teaching Music and Teaching Arts had lower task value in pedacological courses. The low task value placed to pedacological courses was negatively related to instrinsic motivation and deep strategy use.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmanın amacı Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi lisan programına devam eden öğrencilerin öğretmenlik meslek bilgisi derslerindeki başarı durumlarının ve başarılarına etki eden etkenlerin belirlenmesidir. Araştırmanın ilk aşamasında Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi öğretmenliği lisans programlarına devam eden öğrencilerin öğretmenlik meslek bilgisi derslerine ilişkin başarı puanlarının diğer bölüm öğrencilerinin başarı puanlarından düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu bulguların olası nedenlerine ışık tutmak amacıyla yapılan analizler Müzik ve Resim Eğitimi ABD'nda eğitim alan öğrencilerin öğretmenlik meslek bilgisi derslerine diğer bölüm öğrencilerinden daha az değer verdikleri bulunmuştur. Derse verilen düşük değer ise öğrencilerin içsel motivasyonları ve derin strateji kullanımları ile negatif yönde ilişkili bulunmuştur.
47-60

REFERENCES

References: 

Anderson, L. M., Brubaker, N. L., Alleman-Brooks, J., & Duffy, G. G. (1985). A qualitative study of seatwork in first-grade
classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 123-140. Bandura, A. (1982). The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. Journal of Behavior Therapy &
Experimental Psychiatry. 13(3), 195-199. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bandalos, D. L., Yates, K., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (1995). Effects of math self-concept, perceived self-efficacy, and attributions for failure and success on test anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 611 -623.
Belmont, M., Skinner, E., Wellborn, J., & Connell, J.P. (1992). Teacher as Social Context (TASC): Two measures of teacher provision of involvement, structure, and autonomy support: Student report measure (Tech. Rep). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Özkahveci, Ö., Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin Türkçe
formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4 (2), 207-239. Chemers, M. M., Hu, L. & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and
adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology. 93(1), 55-64. Deci, E. L., Nezlek, J., & Sheinman, L. (1981). Charecteristics of the rewarder and instrinsic motivation of rewardee.
Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1-10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.
Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A., Sheinman, L., & ve Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults' orientations toward
control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on instrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 73, 642-650. Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J.T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives
(pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1985). Teacher expectations and student motivation. In J. Dusek (Ed.), Teacher expectancies
(pp. 185-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Flink, C., Boggiano, A. K., Main, D. S., Barrett, M., & ve Katz, P. A. (1992). Children's achievement related behaviors: The
role of extrinsic and instrinsic motivational orientations. In A. K. Boggiano & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and
Motivation: A Social- Developmental Perspective (pp.189-214). New York: Cambridge University Press. Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M., Bernieri, F., & Holt, K. (1984). Setting limits on children's behavior: The differentail effects of
controlling versus informational styles on instrinsic motivation and creativity. Journal of Personality, 52, 233-248. Meece, J. L., Wigfield. A., Eccles J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its consequences for young adolescents' course
enrollment intentions and performances in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60-70. The National Association for Music Education. (2002). Benefits of Music Education. Brochure, Spring.
Özgüngör, S. (2003). Mükemmelliyetçilik ve Özerklik Destekleyici Davranışların Amaç Tarzları ile İlişkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim,
28(127), 25-30.
Özgüngör, S. (2006). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Amaç Tarzlarının Ve Öğretmenlerinin Özerklik Destekleyici Davranışlarına İlişkin Algılarının Öğrencinin Motivasyonu Ve Akademik Davranışlarıyla İlişkisi. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 25, 27-36.
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames and M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments, (Vol. 6, pp. 117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Pintrich, P. R., ve Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. Maehr and P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes, (Vol. 7., pp. 371¬402). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R. , & De Groot, E. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents' motivation self-
regulated learning. Journal ofEarlyAdolescence, 14, 139-161. Pintrich, PR., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic
tasks. In D.H. Schunk ve J.L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149-183). Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Pintrich, P.R.,
Smith
, D.A.R, Garcia, T. ve McKeachie, W. (1991). A Manual For The Use Of The Motivated Strategies For
Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary
Teaching and Learning, Ann Arbor, MI. Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L., Levine, L. J., Wright, E. L., Dennis, W. R., & Newcomb, R. L. (1997). Music training causes
long-term enhancement of preschool children's spatial-temporal reasoning. Neurological Research, 19(1), 1-8. Schunk, D. (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive achievement: implications for students with learning problems. Journal of
Learning Disabilities, 22, 14-22. Schunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings. In D. H. Schunk & B. J.
Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 75-99).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. VanZile-Tamsen, C. (2001). The predictive power of expectancy of success and task value for college students' self-regulated
strategy use. Journal of College Student Development, 42(3) 233-241.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com