You are here

"TUKETIM YOLUYLA KLMLIK LN§ASIM DU^UNCESININ "MEKAN VE NESNE" TASAWURU BAGLAMINDA ACILMASI UZERiNE BiR GiRi§ DENEMESi

A PRE-ATTANDANCE ON THE IDEA OF "CONSTRUCTING AN IDENTITY THROUGH CONSUMPTION" IN THE CONTEXT OF "SPACE AND OBJECT"

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study aims to assay the essentials of the idea "constructing an identity through consumption" within the context of "space and object". It is important to unveil the "consuming activity", assaying with the essentials of "theoria", by revealing the constitution of basis regarding the construction of human's identity. In this sense, the idea whether constructing human's identity or not through consumption was elaborated by the envision of Kog's thought about "space and object". In this way, the idea that "every object is in its own space" and "different objects in different spaces" cannot get in touch with one to another even if they are represented in common environment became apparent. Thus, with reference to the idea above, different objects, in which pertains to different spaces, cannot provide existential gradation (transition). The study resulted in with the idea that neither symbolic nor physical consumption; identity cannot be constructed by means of needs.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu galis.manin amaci, tuketim yoluyla kimlik in§a etme fikrinin esaslarinin mekan ve nesne tasavvuru itibariyle agilmasidir. Tuketici davranis.i galis.malarinin esasini olustaran tuketmek fiilinin, nazariyat esasinda agilmasi, insanin kimlik ins.asina ait teskil esaslarinin ortaya konulmasi bakimindan onem arz etmektedir. Bu manada, bir nesneyi tuketmek yoluyla kimlik tesis edilip edilemeyecegi du§uncesini Kog'un "mekan" ve "nesne" tasavvuru itibariyle incelenmis.tir. Bu suretle, her "nesnenin" iginde bulundugu bir "mekan" oldugunu ve "farkli mekanlar iginde bulunan farkli nesnelerin" ortak bir vasatta temsil edilseler bile birbirlerine temas edemeyecegi fikrini tuketim yoluyla kimlik in§asi fikri dahilinde incelenmi§tir. Agiklananlara nispetle; "farkli mekanlara" mahsus "farkli nesnelerin" varliksal bir gegi§ temin etmeyecegi dtiijuncesinden hareketle, ister fiziksel ister sembolik tuketim du§uncesi yoluyla gergekle§sin, ihtiyag hissi yoluyla tuketerek kimlik tesis edilemeyecegi sonucuna ula§ilmi§
59
67

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Ahuvia, A. C. (2005). Beyond the Extended Self: Loved Objects and Consumers' Identity Narratives. Journal of Consumer Research , 32, 171-184.
Baker, J. M. (1995). The Need for Theory in Marketing. M. J. Baker iginde, Marketing-Theory and Practice (s. 10-22). London: MacMillan Press Ltd.
Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended Self in a Digital World. Journal of Consumer Research , 40, 477¬500.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possesions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research , 15, 139¬18.
Bolay, S. H. (1999). Emile Boutrouxda Zorunsuzluk Doktrini. istanbul: Milli Egitim Bakanligi Yayinlari.
Firat, A. F., & Venkatesh, A. (1995). Liberatory Postmodernism and the Reenchanment of Consumption. Journal of Consumer Reseach , 22, 239-267.
Graeber, D. (2011). Consumption. Current Anthropology, 52 (4), 489-511.
II, A. R., Wooten, D. B., & Bolton, L. E. (2002). The Temporary Constrcution of Consumer Attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology , 12 (4), 375-388.
Kog, Y. (1994). Mekan ve Nesne. Istanbul Universitesi Felsefe Arkivi Dergisi, Sayi 29 , 13-20.
Kog, Y. (2010). Theogonia'nin Esaslari Genesis Nazariyati Uzerine Bir Inceleme. Ankara: Cedit Ne§riyat.
KOC, Y. (2009). Theographia'nin Esaslari Teoloji ve Matematik Insasi Uzerine Bir Inceleme. Ankara: Cedit Ne§riyat.
KOC, Y. (2008). Theologia'nin Esaslari Felsefe'nin ve Teoloji'nin Nazariyati Uzerine Bir Inceleme. Ankara: Cedit Nesjiyat.
Leve, L. (2011). Identity. Current Anhropology , 52 (4), 512-535.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, Vol. 50(4), July,
370-396.
Paylan, M. A., & Torlak, O. (2009). Tarihsel Perspektiften Gelecege Pazarlamanin Seyri. 14. Ulusal Pazarlama Kongresi (s. 1-11). Yozgat: Bildiri Kitabi.
Rindfleisch, A., Burroughs, J. E., & Wong, N. (2009). The Safety of Objects: Materialism,
Existential Insecurity,and Brand Connection. Journal of Consumer Research , 36, 2¬16.
Sabah-Kiyan, S. (2013). Kimlik ve Tuketimiliskisini Tersinden Dusunmek: Luks Urunlerin Taklitleri ile Kimlik Olusturma. Tuketim ve Tuketim Arastirmalari Dergisi, Cilt 5 Sayil , 53-78.
Sartre, J. P. (2002). Varolusguluk. istanbul: Say Yayinlari.
Mehmet Ali Paylan
I 67
Schau, H. J. (1998). Discourse of Possesions: The Metatheory of Russell W. Belk . Advances in Consumer Research , 37-44.
Schemberi, S., Merrilees, B., & Kristiansen, S. (2010). Brand Consumption and Narrative of the Self. Psychology&Marketing, 27 (6), 623-638.
Shankar, A., & Fitchett, J. A. (2002). Having, Being and Consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 18, 501-516.
Shankar, A., Elliot, R., & Goulding, C. (2001). Understanding Consumption: Contributions from a Narrative Perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 17, 429-453.
Stokburger-Sawer, N., & S. Ratneshwar, S. S. (2012). Drivers of consumer- brand
identification. International journal of Research in Marketing, 29, 406-18.
Zwick, D., & Dholakia, N. (2006). The Epistemic Consumption Object and Postsocial Consumption: Expanding Consumer-Object Theory in Consumer Research.
Consumption, Markets and Culture, Vol.9, No.1, March , 17-43.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com