You are here

Home » Content

İSTANBUL İLİNDEKİ RESMİ OKUL VE KURUM MÜDÜRLERİNİN 2001-2011 YILLARI ARASINDAKİ YER DEĞİŞTİRME SIKLIKLARI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Journal Name:

  • Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of the study is to determine the frequency rate of the principals of the public schools and institutions of Ministry of National Education in the years between 2001 and 2011. By the study, the average duty periods of the principals of the public schools and institutions are investigated according to the type of educational institutions and additonally the effect of social-economic environment of the schools on the frequency rate of the principals of the public schools and institutions are investigated. The study was performed as a descriptive study. The sampling of the study is the all public formal and non-formal educational institutions of Ministry of National Education in İstanbul. According to the results of the study, between 2011 and the year 2010 when the rotation application started in, the average duty period of the principals of the public schools and institutions in İstanbul between the years 2001-2010 is 4,91 years. The results of the study parallel to the findings of the literature. According to the findings of the study, the principals of the schools which have the most advantageous socio-economic environment have the tendency to work longer in their schools. This study which will provide the data with the “rotation” discussions among the educators will make an important contribution to Turkish educational literature.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmanın amacı, İstanbul genelinde resmi örgün ve yaygın eğitim kurumlarında görev yapan okul ve kurum müdürlerinin 2001-2011 yılları arasında eğitim kademelerine göre hangi sıklıkta yer değiştirdiğinin belirlenmesidir. Bu araştırma ile aynı zamanda İstanbul genelinde okul ve kurumların müdürlerinin görev sürelerinin okulların sosyo-ekonomik çevrelerine göre değişip değişmediğini belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Tarama modelinde yapılan bu araştırmada örneklem olarak İstanbul ilindeki tüm resmi örgün ve yaygın eğitim kurumları alınmıştır. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre İstanbul ilinde 2001 yılından rotasyon uygulamasının yapıldığı yıla kadar ortalama müdür görev süresi 4,91 yıldır. Bu süreler eğitim literatüründe yer alan araştırmalarda elde edilen bulgularla uyumludur. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre sosyo-ekonomik çevresi yönüyle en avantajlı okullarda çalışan müdürler daha fazla okullarında yöneticilik yapma eğilimindedirler. Eğitim çalışanları arasında “rotasyon” olarak bilinen okul müdürlerinin beş yılda bir yer değiştirmesi tartışmalarına veri sağlayacak olan bu araştırmanın Türk eğitim literatürüne önemli bir katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_5675_10_pp_91-103.pdf
  • 19
91-103
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Belt, C. M. (2009). Factors affecting principal turnover: A study of three midwestern cities.
(Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). University of Kansas.
Brown, M. C.(1982). Administrative succession and organizational performance: The
succession effect. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 1-16.
Bruggink, P. B. (2001). Principal succession and school effectiveness: The Relationship
between the frequency of principal turnover in Florida public schools from 1990-91
to 1998-99 and school performance indicators ın 1998-1999. (Yayımlanmamış tez).
The Florida State University, USA.
Caldwell, B. J. (1992). The Effects of principal succession on teacher morale. (Yayımlanmamış
doktora tezi). South Carolina State University, USA.
Carlson, R. O. (1961). Succession and performance among school superintendents. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 6(2), 210-227.
Clayton, J. K. & Johnson, B. (2011). If ıt ain’t broke, don’t fix ıt: A new principals in town.
Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership 14(4), 22-30.
Cosgrove, D. (1986). The effects of principal succession on elementary schools. (Yayımlanmamış
doktora tezi). The University of Utah, USA.
Erdoğan, İ. (2010). Milli eğitime dair. Ankara: Nobel.
Erdoğan, İ. (2012). Eğitimde değişim yönetimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Fogo, S. R. (2002). School reform models and their effect on student reading achievement
and principal succession. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Bowling Green State
University, USA.
Garza Jr. E., Murakami-Ramalho, E. & Merchant, B. (2011). Leadership succession and
successful leadership: The case of Laura Martinez. Leadership and Policy, 423-443.
Gates, S., Ringel, J., Santibanez, L., Guarino, C., Ghosh-Dastidar, B. & Brown, A.(2006).
Mobility and turnover among school principals. Economics of Education Review, 25,
289-302.
102 İstanbul İlindeki Resmi Okul Ve Kurum Müdürlerinin 2001-2011 Yılları Arasındaki Yer
Değiştirme Sıklıkları Üzerine Bir Araştırma
Glasspool, T. S. (2006). Socialization of Pennsylvannia high school principal succession.
(Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). University of Pittsburgh, USA.
Grusky, O. (1960). Adninistrative succession ın formal organizations. Social Forces,
39(2), 105-115.
Grusky, O. (1961). Corporate size, bureaucratization, and managerial succession. The
American Journal of Sociology, 67(3), 261-269.
Grusky, O. (1963). Managerial succession and organizational effectiveness. The American
Journal of Sociology, 69(1), 21-31.
Grusky, O. (1969). Succession with an ally. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(2),
155-170.
Hançerlioğlu, O. (1977). Felsefe sözlüğü. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
Hançerlioğlu, O. (1993). Düşünce tarihi. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
Hawthorne-Clay, S.A. (2010). A comparative study of principal turnover in union and
non-unionized school districst in Ohio. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Ashland University
Ashland, Ohio.
Henrikson, H. A. (2007). The relationship between the use of multiple leadership frames
and the meeting of principal succession challenges. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi).
Roosevelt University, Illinois.
Hess, F.M. (2000). Why urban school reform doesn’t deliver. http://www.aasa.org/SchoolAdministratorArticle.
aspx?id=14220&terms=hess adresinden elde edildi.
Johnson, B. J. (1999). The dynamics of succession - the first months: A qualitative study
of principal succession in four elementary schools of the amalgamated catholic school
district. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Boston College, USA.
Jones, J. C. (2000). Principal succession: A case study. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans
tezi). University of Calgary, Canada.
Kelly, M. L. (1986). A Study of school principal turnover in North Missouri. (Yayımlanmamış
tez). Northeast Missouri State University.
Macmillan, R. B., Meyer, M. J., & Northfield, S. (2004). Trust and its role in principal
succession: A preliminary examination of a continuum of trust. Leadership and Policy
in Schools, 3(4), 275-294.
Mascal, B. & Leithwood, K. (2010). Investing in leadership: The district’s role in managing
principal turnover. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, 367–383.
Meyer, M. J., Macmillan, R. B. & Northfield, S. K. (2009a). Principal succession and its
impact on teacher morale. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(2),
171–185.
Meyer, M. J., Macmillan, R. B. & Northfield, S. K. (2009b). The use of conscience and
discretion as constructs in principals’ difficult or conflicted decision-making dealings
during principal succession events. ISEA, 37(3), 20-36.
Miskel, C. & Owens, M. (1983, April). Principal succession and changes in school coupling
and effectiveness. Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational
Research Association, Montreal.
Mitchell, M. M. , Bradshaw, C. P. & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Student and teacher perceptions of
school climate: A multilevel exploration of patterns of discrepancy. Journal of School
Health, 80(6), 271-279.
Engin ŞİMŞEK 103
Naman, W. A. (2009). Turnover in FOCUS: An examinatıon of the variables that teachers
consider when making decisions to stay in or leave their positions. (Yayımlanmamış
doktora tezi). University of Virginia.
Noonan, W. (1996). Principal succession and elementary school climate: one year’s
experience in an urban school divison. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). University of
Oregon, Canada.
Oberman, G. L. (1996). A report on principal turnover in the Chicago public schools.
Chicago: Department of Research, Evaluation and Planning.
Papa, F. Jr. (2007). Why do principals change schools? A multivariate analysis of principal
retention. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6, 267-290.
Parthlow, M. C. (2007). Contextual factors related to elementary principal turnover. Planning
and Changing, 38(1&2), 60-76.
Punswick, E. J. (2008). Elementary principals’ backgrounds, stability, moves, and departures:
Evidence from Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin. (Yayımlanmamış
doktora tezi). University of Kansas.
Rigdon, K. L. (2000). Principal succession: Realities encountered by successor principals
during the succession process. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). University of Northern
Iowa.
Sarbit, B. G.(2001). Principal succession: The real story? (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi).
University of Alberta, Canada.
Sheppard, R. R. (2010). Determining Factors that influence high school principal turnover
over a five year period. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). University of North Texas
Siesel, A. H. (1997). The Relationship between principal succession and teachers’ readiness
to change. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Tulane University.
Stoelinga, S. R., Hart, H. & Schalliol, D. (2008). The work of chicago public schools’
principals: Leading in a complex context with high stakes. Chicago: Consortium On
Chicago School Research At The University Of Chicago.
Tekleselassie, A. A. & Villarreal III, P. (2011). Career mobility and departure ıntentions
among school principals in the United States: Incentives and disincentives. Leadership
and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 251-293.
Toffler, A. (1971). Future shock. New York: Bantam Books.
Tonbul, Y. & Sağıroğlu, S. (2012). Okul müdürlerinin zorunlu yer değiştirme uygulamasına
ilişkin bir araştırma. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 18(2), 313-339.
Whittall, M. (2002). Principal retention and transition patterns in a cross-section of New
Zealand rural schools, may 1990 - may 2000. New Zealand Christchurch Coll. Of
Education.
Wilson, A. P. & Heim, J. M. (1984, October). Principal turnover by Kansas rural school
administrators from 1978-1984. Paper presented at The Annual Rural and Small School
Conference, Manhattan.
Yılmaz, K., Altınkurt, Y., Karaköse, T. & Erol, E. (2012). Okul Yöneticilerine uygulanan
zorunlu yer değiştirme uygulaması hakkında okul yöneticilerinin ve öğretmenlerin
görüşleri. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 65-83.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com