You are here

Dinamik karaciğer bilgisayarlı tomografilerinde nonspesifik kontrastlanan hipodens karaciğer lezyonları: ultrasonografi ve biyopsi sonuçları

Nonspecific contrasted hypodense liver lesions in dynamic liver computed tomography: findings of ultrasonography and biopsy

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, the ratios of cyts, hemangiomas and metastases in patients with and without malignancy were aimed to be determined evaluating nonspecific contrasted hypodens liver lesions in dynamic liver computed tomography as a cohort group. Lesions were grouped on the basis of segmental location and whether there was primary malignity comparing the sonographic and biopsy findings of 122 lesions in 55 patients. In 22 patients with the history of malignity only 40% of lesions were metastases, and cyst, hemangioma and focal hepatosteatosis were detected in 35%, 22% and 3% of these patients, respectively. If nonspecific hypodens hepatic lesions are detected on dynamic liver computed tomography in patients with a history of malignancy, ultrasonography and/or magnetic resonance imaging should be performed, and biopsy should be made if necessary, in revealing the nature of lesions.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada karaciğer dinamik bilgisayarlı tomografik incelemede hipodens olarak tarif edilen nonspesifik lezyonlar kohort grubu olarak değerlendirilerek, primer malignitesi olan ve olmayan hastalarda, kist-hemanjiyom-metastaz olma oranlarının hesaplanması hedeflenmiştir. Bu amaçla, 55 hastada toplam 122 lezyonun ultrasonografi ve biyopsi bulguları karşılaştırılarak, lezyonlar segmentlere ve primer malignitenin olup olmamasına göre sınıflandırılmıştır. Malignite öyküsü olan 22 hastadaki lezyonların sadece %40'ı metastaz iken, %35'inde kist, %22'sinde hemanjiyom, %3'ünde fokal heterojen yağlanma alanı saptanmıştır. Malignite öyküsü bulunan hastalarda dinamik bilgisayarlı tomografide nonspesifik hipodens lezyonlar saptandığında, lezyon tabiatı ortaya konulana kadar ultrasonografi ve/veya manyetik rezonans göröntüleme ile değerlendirilmeli ve gerekirse biyopsi yapılmalıdır.
11-13

REFERENCES

References: 

1- Foley WD. Dynamic hepatic CT.
Radiology 1989; 170: 617-622.
2. Mahfouz AE, Hamm B, Mathieu D.
Imaging of metastases to the liver. Eur
Radiol 1996; 6: 607-614.
3. Yun EJ, Choi BI, Han JK, et al.
Hepatic hemangioma: contrast enhancement pattern during the arterial
and portal venous phases of spiral CT.
Abdom Imaging 1999; 24: 262-266.
4. Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Vullierme
MP, Lagalla R, Midiri M, Vilgrain V.
CT and MR imaging evaluation of
hepatic adenoma. J Comput Assist
Tomogr 2006; 30: 745-750.
5. Zheng L, Wu PH, Shen JX, et al.
Typical and atypical features of focal
nodular hyperplasia of the liver on
helical CT images. Ai Zheng 2006; 25:
861-865.
6. Hollett MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, NinoMurcia M, Jorgensen MJ, Harris DP.
Dual-phase helical CT of the liver:
value of arterial phase scans in the
detection of small (< or = 1.5 cm)
malignant hepatic neoplasms. Am J
Roentgenol 1995; 164: 879-884.
7. Honda H, Matsuura Y, Onitsuka H, et
al. Differential diagnosis of hepatic
tumors (hepatoma, hemangioma, and
metastasis) with CT: value of twophase incremental imaging. Am J
Roentgenol 1992; 159: 735-740.
8. Federle MP, Filly RA, Moss AA.
Cystic hepatic neoplasms: complementary roles of CT and sonography.
Am J Roentgenol 1981; 136: 345-348.
9. Murphy BJ, Casillas J, Ros PR, Morillo G, Albores-Saavedra J, Rolfes DB.
The CT appearance of cystic masses of
the liver. Radiographics 1989; 9: 307-
322.
10.Ito K, Honjo K, Fujita T, et al. Liver
neoplasms: diagnostic pitfalls in crosssectional imaging. Radiographics 1996;
16: 273-293

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com