You are here

Büyük Veri Üzerine Eleştirel Sorular: Kültürel, Teknolojik ve Bilimsel Bir Olgu Hakkında Eleştirel Sorgulamalar

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (Original Language): 
Büyük Veri çağı başlamıştır. Bilgisayar uzmanları, fizikçiler, ekonomistler, matematikçiler, siyaset bilimcileri, biyo-bilişimciler, sosyologlar ve diğer bilginler, yalnızca insanlar, şeyler ve bunların etkileşimleri tarafından ve haklarında üretilen devasa miktardaki bilgilere ulaşmak için çırpınıp durmaktadırlar. Çeşitli gruplar türeyimsel zincirleri, sosyal medya etkileşimlerini, sağlık kayıtlarını, telefon günlüklerini, devlet kayıtlarını ve insanların diğer tüm dijital izlerini incelemenin muhtemel faydaları ve getirileri hakkında tartışmalar yürütmektedirler. Böylece ortaya muazzam sorular çıkar: Büyük ölçekli araştırma verileri daha iyi araçlar, servisler ve kamu yararı oluşturmamıza yardımcı olacak mıdır, yoksa yeni bir gizlilik ihlali ve istilacı pazarlama dalgasının önünü mü açılacaktır? Veri analizi çevrimiçi toplulukları ve siyasal hareketleri anlamamıza yardım mı edecektir, yoksa protestocu izlerini takip etmek ve sesleri susturmak için mi kullanılacaktır? İnsan iletişimi ve kültürü üzerine çalışma disiplinlerimizi mi dönüştürecek, yoksa araştırma seçeneklerimizi daraltıp “araştırma” sözcüğünden ne anladığımızı mı değiştirecek? Bu açılardan, Büyük Veriyi sosyo-tekniksel bir olgu olarak ele aldığımızda, varsayım ve önyargıların eleştirel bir biçimde eklemlenmesinin gerekli olduğunu iddia etmekteyiz. Bu makalede ütopyacı ve distopyacı retoriği harekete geçirmekte olup, teknoloji, analiz ve mitoloji birlikteliğine dayanan kültürel, teknolojik ve bilimsel bir olgu olarak Büyük Veri etrafında toplanan konular hakkındaki görüşleri keskinleştirmek için altı farklı tartışma konusu öneriyoruz:
199
215

REFERENCES

References: 

Acquisti, A. ve Gross, R. (2009). Predicting social security numbers from publicdata,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, sayı. 106, no. 27,ss. 10975–10980.
Anderson, C. (2008). The end of theory, will the data deluge makes the scientificmethod
obsolete?, Edge, [Online] Erişim http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/anderson08/anderson08_
index.html (25 Temmuz 2011).
Anderson, M. (1988). The American Census: A Social History, Yale University Press,New
Haven, CT.
Baca, G. (2004). Legends of Fordism: between myth, history, and foregone conclusions,
Social Analysis, sayı. 48, no. 3, ss. 169–178.
Behar, R. ve Gordon, D. A. (Der.) (1996). Women Writing Culture, University of California
Press, Berkeley, CA.
Berry, D. (2011). The computational turn: thinking about the digital humanities, Culture
Machine, sayı. 12, [Online] Erişim: http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/
view/440/470 (11 Temmuz 2011).
Blass, T. (2004). The Man Who Shocked the World: The Life and Legacy of Stanley Milgram,
Basic Books, New York.
Bollier, D. (2010). The promise and peril of big data, [Online] Erişim: http://www.aspeninstitute.
org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs/The_Promise_and_Peril_of_Big_Data.
pdf (11 Temmuz 2011).
Bowker, G. C. (2005). Memory Practices in the Sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Boyd, D. ve Marwick, A. (2011). Social privacy in networked publics: teens’
attitudes,practices, and strategies, paper given at Oxford Internet Institute,[Online] Erişim:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1925128 (28 Eylül 2011).
Burkholder, L. (Der.) (1992). Philosophy and the Computer, Westview Press, Boulder,
San Francisco ve Oxford.
Cain, M. ve Finch, J. (1981). Towards a rehabilitation of data, içinde P. Abrams, R. Deem,
J. Finch ve P. Rock (Der.) Practice and Progress: British Sociology 1950 –1980, ss.105-119.
George Allen and Unwin, London.
Clifford, J. ve Marcus, G. E. (Der.) (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of
Ethnography, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
folklor / edebiyat
213
Conover, M. (2011). Jimmy Lin, Complexity and Social Networks Blog, [Online] Erişim:
http://www.iq.harvard.edu/blog/netgov/2011/07/the_international_conferen...
(9 Aralık 2011).
Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: disciplines of listening in social media’, Continuum:
Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, sayı. 23, no. 4, ss. 532–533.
Derrida, J. (1996). Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression Çev. Eric Prenowitz, University
of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Dourish, P. ve Bell, G. (2011). Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous
Computing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Du Gay, P. ve Pryke, M. (2002). Cultural Economy: Cultural Analysis and Commercial
Life, Sage, London.
Durkheim, E. (1895/1982). Rules of Sociological Method, The Free Press, New York,NY.
Ess, C. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: recommendations from the
aoir ethics working committee, Association of Internet Researchers, [Online] Erişim: http://
aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf (12 Eylül 2011).
Fischer, C. (1982). To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and
City,University of Chicago, Chicago.
Forsythe, D. (2001). Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of
Artificial Intelligence, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Freeman, L. (2006). The Development of Social Network Analysis, Empirical
Press,Vancouver.
Fry, J. P. ve Sibley, E. H. (1996). [1974] Evolution of database management systems,
Computing Surveys, sayı. 8, no. 1.1, ss. 7 –42. yeniden basıldı: (1996) Great Papers in Computer
Science, (Der.) L. Laplante, IEEE Press, New York.
Gitelman, L. (2011). Notes for the Upcoming Collection ‘Raw Data’ is an Oxymoron,
[Online] Erişim: https://files.nyu.edu/lg91/public/ (23 Temmuz 2011).
Golder, S. (2010). Scaling social science with hadoop, Cloudera Blog, [Online]
Erişim:http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2010/04/scaling-social-sciencewith-hadoop/(18 Haziran
2011).
Golder, S. ve Macy, M.W. (2011). Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep and
Daylength across diverse cultures, Science, sayı. 333, no. 6051, ss. 1878–1881, [Online]
Erişim: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/333/6051/1878.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology,
sayı. 78, no. 6, ss. 1360–1380.
Harding, S. (2010). ‘Feminism, science and the anti-Enlightenment critiques’, içinde
(Der.) A. Garry ve M. Pearsall, Women, Knowledge and Reality: Explorations in Feminist
Philosophy, Unwin Hyman, Boston, MA, ss. 298–320.
Homans, G. C. (1974). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, MA.
Kranzberg, M. (1986).Technology and history: kranzberg’s laws, Technology and Culture,
sayı. 27, no. 3, ss. 544–560.
Latour, B. (2009). Tarde’s idea of quantification, içinde (Der.) M. Candea The Social after
Gabriel Tarde:Debates and Assessments, ss. 145-162. Routledge, London. [Online] Available
at: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/articles/article/116-TARDE-CANDEA.pdf (19 Haziran
2011).
folklor / edebiyat
214
Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Baraba´si, A., Brewer, D., Christakis, N.,
Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M.,Roy, D. ve Van
Alstyne, M. (2009). Computational social science, Science, sayı.323, no. 5915, ss. 721–723.
Leinweber, D. (2007). Stupid data miner tricks: overfitting the S&P 500, The Journal of
Investing, sayı. 16, no. 1, ss. 15–22.
Lessig, L. (1999). Code: and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Basic Books, New York, NY.
Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A. ve Christakis, N. (2008). Tastes, ties,
and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com, Social Networks, sayı. 30, no.
4, ss. 330–342.
Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., Pearce, I. ve boyd, D. (2011). The revolutions
were tweeted: information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions,
International Journal of Communications, sayı. 5, ss. 1375–1405, [Online] Erişim: http://
ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1246.
Manovich, L. (2011). Trending: the promises and the challenges of big social data, İçinde
(Der.) M.K. Gold, Debates in the Digital Humanities, The University of Minnesota Press,
Minneapolis, MN, [Online] Erişim: http://www.manovich.net/DOCS/Manovich_trending_
paper.pdf (15 Temmuz 2011).
McCloskey, D. N. (Der.) (1985). From methodology to rhetoric, The Rhetoric of Economics,
University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, ss. 20–35.
Meeder, B., Tam, J., Gage Kelley, P. ve Faith Cranor, L. (2010). RT @IWantPrivacy: widespread
violation of privacy settings in the Twitter social network, paper presented at Web
2.0 Security and Privacy, W2SP 2011, Oakland, CA.
Meiss, M. R., Menczer, F. ve Vespignani, A. (2008). Structural analysis of behavioral
networks from the Internet, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, sayı. 41,
no. 22, ss. 220–224.
Moretti, F. (2007). Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History, Verso,
London.
Onnela, J. P., Sarama¨ki, J., Hyvo¨nen, J., Szabo´, G., Lazer, D., Kaski, K., Kerte´sz, J.
ve Baraba´si, A. L. (2007). Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks,
Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences, sayı. 104, no. 18, ss. 7332–7336.
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You, Penguin
Press, New York.
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1940). On social structure, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological
Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, sayı. 70, no. 1, ss. 1–12.
Reverby, S. M. (2009). Examining Tuskegee: The Infamous Syphilis Study and Its Legacy,
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
Savage, M. ve Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology,
Sociology,sayı. 41, no. 5, ss. 885–899.
Schrag, Z. M. (2010). Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social
Sciences, 1965 –2009, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Shamma, D. A., Kennedy, L., veChurchill, E. F. (2010). Tweetgeist: Can the Twitter Timeline
Reveal the Structure of Broadcast Events?. Paper presented at the Computer-Supported
Cooperative Work-2010, Association for Computing Machinery, February 6 –10, Savannah,
Georgia USA. Erişim: http://research.yahoo.com/pub/3041.
Suchman, L. (2011). Consuming anthropology, içinde (Der.) A. Barry ve G. Born Interdisciplinarity:
Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences, eds, Routledge,
folklor / edebiyat
215
London,[Online] Erişim: http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/doc_library/sociology/Suchman_consuming_
anthroploogy.pdf.
Troshynski, E., Lee, C. ve Dourish, P. (2008). Accountabilities of presence: reframing location-
based systems, Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human
factors in computing systems, Nisan 5–10, Florence, Italy.
Twitter (2011). One hundred million voices, Twitter Blog, [Online] Erişim:http://blog.
Twitter.com/2011/09/one-hundred-million-voices.html (12 Eylül 2011).
Veinot, T. (2007). The eyes of the power company: workplace information practices of a
vault inspector, The Library Quarterly, sayı. 77, no. 2, ss. 157–180.
Wang, X. (2011). Twitter posts show workers worldwide are stressed out on the job’,
Bloomberg Businessweek, [Online] Erişim: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-09-
29/Twitter-posts-show-workers-worldwide-arestressed-out-on-the-job.html (12 Mart 2012).
Wu, S., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A. ve Watts, D. J. (2011). Who says what to whom on
Twitter’, Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2011), Mart
28-Nisan 1, Hyderabad, India, ss. 705 –714.
Zimmer, M. (2008). More on the “Anonymity” of the Facebook dataset – it’s Harvard College,
MichaelZimmer.org Blog, [Online] Erişim: http://www.michaelzimmer.org/2008/01/03/
more-on-the-anonymity-of-the-facebook-dataset-its-harvard-college/ (20 Haziran 2011).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com