You are here

A physics laboratory course designed using problem-based learning for prospective physics teachers

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
In general, laboratories are exercises with a primary focus on the verification of established laws and principles, or on the discovery of objectively knowable facts. In laboratories, students gather data without comprehending the meaning of their actions. The cognitive demand of laboratory tasks is reduced to a minimal level. To prevent these deficiencies, activities in a physics laboratory course were redesigned using problem‐based learning. Problem‐based learning is an inquiry based instructional design in which experiential learning organized around the investigation, explanation, and resolution of meaningful problems. In activities, instructional strategy is studentcentered and learning has to occur in small student groups under the guidance of a tutor. Authentic real world problems are primarily encountered in the learning sequence. To solve the problems, students propose hypothesis, and test their hypothesis with suitable experiment designs. Laboratory design and instruction strategies are very suitable for performing science process skills.
29-33

REFERENCES

References: 

Barrows, H. S. (2000). Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Southern Illinois University Press, Springerfield.
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond. In L. Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), New
directions for teaching and learning: Vol. 68. Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice
(pp. 3–13). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, A. L. & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided cooperative learning and individual knowledge
acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Eylon, B., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education.
Review of Educational Research, 58(3), 251–301.
Gunstone, R. F., & Champagne, A. B. (1990). Promoting conceptual change in the laboratory. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The
student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 159–182). London: Routledge.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of
Educational Research, 52(2), 201–217.
Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., Scott, L. E. and Ramolae, B. A. (1985). Effects of single-sex and mixed-sex cooperative interaction
on science achievement and attitudes and cross-handicap and cross-sex relationships. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 22 (3), 207-220.
Lazarowitz, R., & Tamir, P. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science, In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research
on science teaching and learning (pp. 94–130). New York: Macmillan.
Lunetta, V. N. (2003). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In B.J.
Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), Handbook of Science Education (pp. 249-262). Great Britain: Kluwer Academics Publishers.
Martin, D. J. (2000). Elementary science methods: A constructivist approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning.
Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Okebukola, P. A. (1985). The relative effectiveness of cooperative and competitive interaction techniques in strengthening
students' performance in science classes. Science Education, 69(4), 501-509.
Roth, W. M. (1994). Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31,
197–223.
Tobin, K. G. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: in pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning.
School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403-418.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com