You are here

Home » Content

AİLENİN SOSYO- DEMOGRAFİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN ÇOCUĞUN OKULDAKİ SOSYAL ETKİNLİKLERE KATILIMI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ: TÜRKİYE VE HOLLANDA ARASINDA KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR ÇALIŞMA

EFFECTS OF FAMILY SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS ON CHILD PARTICIPATION IN SOCIAL ACTIVITIES AT SCHOOL: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN TURKEY AND THE NETHERLANDS

Journal Name:

  • Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The study focuses on investigating whether family socio-demographic characteristics affect a child’s participation in leisure and social activities at school from a cross-cultural perspective. The findings indicate that being members of an individualistic society, Dutch parents’ and teachers’ attitudes significantly explained the priority in valuing leisure in a child’s socialization and education. In contrast, a child in Turkish society is socialized within a collectivist culture where individual needs, interests, autonomy and self–sufficiency are ignored. Therefore, the data on Turkish parents’ and teachers’ attitudes revealed that academic success had priority in a child’s socialization and education.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalısma, ailenin sosyo-demografik özelliklerinin çocugun okuldaki sosyal etkinliklere katılımı üzerinde etkisinin olup olmadıgını belirlemeye odaklanmıstır. Bulgular, bireyci toplum özelligi tasıyan Hollanda’da ebeveynlerin ve ögretmenlerin çocugun toplumsallasmasında ve egitiminde bos zaman degerlendirmenin öncelikli bir deger tasıdıgını göstermistir. Buna karsın, Türk toplumunda kolektivist degerlerle toplumsallasan çocuk, bireysel gereksinimlerin, ilgilerin, özerkligin ve öz yeterligin fazla önemsenmedigi sosyal çevrede yetismektedir. Bu baglamda veriler; Türk ebeveynler ve ögretmenlerin, çocugun toplumsallasması ve egitiminde akademik basarıyı bos zaman degerlendirmeden çok daha fazla önemsediklerini göstermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 24-471-1-pb.pdf
  • 2
210-226
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Arslantas, Ö. (1989). 7lkokullarda egitici kol çalısmalarında karsılasılan
sorunlar. Yayımlanmamıs Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi,
Adana.
Aslan, K. (1996). Ailenin sosyoekonomik durumunun çocugun okul basarısına
etkisi. E.Ü. Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları, 85, &zmir.
Aslan, N. (2000). Üniversite ögrencilerinin bos zaman degerlendirme egilimi
(ögretmen yetistiren kurumlarda karsılastırmalı bir arastırma). Ege
Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Yayınları, 3, &zmir.
Aslan, N. (2009). An examination of family leisure and family satisfaction among
traditional Turkish families. Journal of Leisure Research, 41.
Bianchi, S. M. & Robinson J. (1997). What did you do today? Children’s use of
time, family composition, and the acquisition of social capital. Journal of
Marriage and Family, 59.
Burch, W. R. Jr. (1969). The social circles of leisure: Competing explanations.
Journal of Leisure Research, 1.
Burt, C. E., Cohen, L. H., & Bjorck, J. P. (1998). Perceived family environment
as moderator of young adolescents’ life stress adjustment. American Journal
of Community Psychology, 16.
Büchel, F., & Duncan, G. J. (1998). Do parents’ social activities promote
children’s school attainments? Evidence from the German socioeconomic
panel. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60.
Collins, W. A., Maccoby, E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E. M., & M. H.
Bornstein, (2000). Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature
and nurture. American Psychologist, 55.
Cooper, J. E., Holman, J. & Braitwaite, V. A. (1983). Self-esteem and family
cohesion: The child’s perspective and adjustment. Journal of Marriage and
the Family, 45.
DuBois, D. L., Elitel, S. K., & Felner, F. D. (1994). Effects of family
environment and parent-child relationships on school adjustment during
transition to early adolescence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 56.
Giddens, A. (2000). Sosyoloji. (Yayına Hazırlayanlar: H.Özel, C.Güzel, Ayraç
Yayınları, 1. Basım).
Gündüz, H. (1997). Egitici kol çalısmalarının etkililigi ile ilgili ögretmen ve
yönetici görüsleri. Yayımlanmamıs Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
Hoff, A. E. & Ellis, G. D. (1992). Influence of agents of leisure socialization on
leisure self-efficacy of university students. Journal of Leisure Research, 24.
Howard, D. R. & Madrigal, R. (1990). Who makes the decision: the parent or the
child? The perceived influence of parents and children on the purchase of
recreation services. Journal of Leisure Research, 22.
Hutchinson, S. L. (2003). Differentiating parent practices related to adolescent
behavior in the free time context. Journal of Leisure Research, 4th Quarter.
Kagıtçıbası, Ç. (1990). Family and socialization in cross-cultural perspective: A
model of change. In J. Berman (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives: Nebraska
symposium on motivation. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press, 135-
200.
Kagıçıbası, Ç. (1996a). Family and human development across cultures: A view
from the other side. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kagıtçıbası, Ç. (2002). A model of family change in cultural context. In W. J.
Lonner, D. L: Dinnel, S. A. Hayes and D. N. Sattler (Eds.), Online Readings
in Psychology and Culture (Unit 13, Chapter 1)
(http://www.www.edu/culture) , Center for Cross-Cultural Research,
Western Washington Un., Bellingham, Washington, USA.
Karaköy, U. F. (1995). 7lkögretim okullarında egitsel kol çalısmaları (Ankara 7li
Çankaya 7lçesi Örnegi). Yayımlanmamıs Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
Kawash, G. & Kozeluk L. (1990). Self-esteem in children as a function of
position within Olson’s circumplex Model of maritial and family systems.
Social Behavior and Personality, 18.
Kelly, R. J. (1974). Socialization toward leisure: A developmental approach.
Journal of Leisure Research, 6.
Ketsetzis, M., Ryan, B.A. & Adams, G. R. (1998). Family processes, parent-child
interactions, and child characteristics influencing school-based social
adjustment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60.
Kurdek, L. A. & Sinclair, R. J. (1998a). Adjustment of young adolescents in twoparent
nuclear, stepfather, and mother-custody families. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56.
Kurdek, L. A. & Sinclair, R. J. (1998b) Relation to eighth graders’ family
structure, gender and family environment with academic performance and
school behavior. Journal of Educational Pyschology, 80.
Lin, C. Y. C. & Fu, V. R. (1990). A comparison of child-rearing practices among
Chinese, immigrant Chinese, and Caucasian-American parents. Child
Development, 61.
Morgan, D. & Alwin, D (1980). When less is more: School size and student
participation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43.
Moos, R. H. & Moos, B. S. (1986). Family environment scale manual (2nd ed).
Palo Alto, C.A: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Phalet, K. & Schonpflug, U. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of
collectivism and achievement values in two acculturation contexts: The case
of Turkish families in Germany and Turkish and Moroccan families in the
Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32.
Rapaport, R. & Rapaport, R. N (1976). Leisure and the family life-cycle.
(Routledge Kegan Paul, Boston).
Steinberg, L. (2000). The family at adolescence: Transition and transformation.
Journal of Adolescent Health, 27.
Yoesting, D. R., & Burkhead, D. L (1973). Significance of childhood recreation
experience on adult leisure behavior. Journal of Leisure Research, 5.
Zabriskie, R. B. & McCormick, B. (2003). Parent and child perspectives of
family leisure involvement and satisfaction with family life. Journal of
Leisure Research, 35.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com